Sharon Tirosh-Levy , Elena Blinder , Jacob Joost Doekes , Monica L. Mazuz
{"title":"时机决定一切——选择合适的时间对牛群进行新孢子病筛查。","authors":"Sharon Tirosh-Levy , Elena Blinder , Jacob Joost Doekes , Monica L. Mazuz","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neosporosis is a major cause of abortions in cattle, leading to economic losses. As no effective treatment or vaccine is currently available, the only strategy to reduce the impact of neosporosis in endemic herds is implementation of control programs, based on serological surveillance. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for serological testing. Sera were collected from 132 heifers at three farms at three months intervals, between the ages 5 and 28 months. <em>Neospora</em> serological status and antibody titers were evaluated by IFAT, and by ELISA on the first sampling. The agreement between ELISA and IFAT results was 89.9 % (Kappa=0.798). Overall <em>Neospora</em> seroprevalence ranged between 36 % and 66 % on different dates. The antibody titers of almost all heifers fluctuated over time. Of 91 heifers that were sampled on 5 occasions, 67 % maintained their serological status throughout the study. Most cases of negative heifers that become positive in one or more tests (19 of 21 heifers) were transient, while only three remained persistently infected in all further tests. Seropositivity was significantly lower in lactating cows than in pregnant cows or heifers. The results of the first sampling date were representative of the overall status on all dates, with an agreement of 94.5 % (Kappa=0.889). The results demonstrate how fluctuations in antibody titers may affect the sensitivity of serological surveillance. Sampling young heifers, prior to their first insemination may be advisable, allowing future discrimination between what appear to be new infection, which is mostly transient, and congenital or chronic infections, which are usually life-long. This information may assist in the implementation of effective control measures in the herd.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 110622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing is everything – Choosing the right time to screen the herd for neosporosis\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Tirosh-Levy , Elena Blinder , Jacob Joost Doekes , Monica L. Mazuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Neosporosis is a major cause of abortions in cattle, leading to economic losses. As no effective treatment or vaccine is currently available, the only strategy to reduce the impact of neosporosis in endemic herds is implementation of control programs, based on serological surveillance. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for serological testing. Sera were collected from 132 heifers at three farms at three months intervals, between the ages 5 and 28 months. <em>Neospora</em> serological status and antibody titers were evaluated by IFAT, and by ELISA on the first sampling. The agreement between ELISA and IFAT results was 89.9 % (Kappa=0.798). Overall <em>Neospora</em> seroprevalence ranged between 36 % and 66 % on different dates. The antibody titers of almost all heifers fluctuated over time. Of 91 heifers that were sampled on 5 occasions, 67 % maintained their serological status throughout the study. Most cases of negative heifers that become positive in one or more tests (19 of 21 heifers) were transient, while only three remained persistently infected in all further tests. Seropositivity was significantly lower in lactating cows than in pregnant cows or heifers. The results of the first sampling date were representative of the overall status on all dates, with an agreement of 94.5 % (Kappa=0.889). The results demonstrate how fluctuations in antibody titers may affect the sensitivity of serological surveillance. Sampling young heifers, prior to their first insemination may be advisable, allowing future discrimination between what appear to be new infection, which is mostly transient, and congenital or chronic infections, which are usually life-long. This information may assist in the implementation of effective control measures in the herd.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"volume\":\"340 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440172500233X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440172500233X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Timing is everything – Choosing the right time to screen the herd for neosporosis
Neosporosis is a major cause of abortions in cattle, leading to economic losses. As no effective treatment or vaccine is currently available, the only strategy to reduce the impact of neosporosis in endemic herds is implementation of control programs, based on serological surveillance. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for serological testing. Sera were collected from 132 heifers at three farms at three months intervals, between the ages 5 and 28 months. Neospora serological status and antibody titers were evaluated by IFAT, and by ELISA on the first sampling. The agreement between ELISA and IFAT results was 89.9 % (Kappa=0.798). Overall Neospora seroprevalence ranged between 36 % and 66 % on different dates. The antibody titers of almost all heifers fluctuated over time. Of 91 heifers that were sampled on 5 occasions, 67 % maintained their serological status throughout the study. Most cases of negative heifers that become positive in one or more tests (19 of 21 heifers) were transient, while only three remained persistently infected in all further tests. Seropositivity was significantly lower in lactating cows than in pregnant cows or heifers. The results of the first sampling date were representative of the overall status on all dates, with an agreement of 94.5 % (Kappa=0.889). The results demonstrate how fluctuations in antibody titers may affect the sensitivity of serological surveillance. Sampling young heifers, prior to their first insemination may be advisable, allowing future discrimination between what appear to be new infection, which is mostly transient, and congenital or chronic infections, which are usually life-long. This information may assist in the implementation of effective control measures in the herd.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.