Parisa Javadnia, Afshan Davari, Nadia Zameni, Amir Reza Bahadori, Sara Ahmadi, Sara Mohammadian, Abbas Tafakhori, Sajad Shafiee, Sara Ranji
{"title":"人工智能在预测与不同治疗方法相关的前庭神经鞘瘤临床结果中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Parisa Javadnia, Afshan Davari, Nadia Zameni, Amir Reza Bahadori, Sara Ahmadi, Sara Mohammadian, Abbas Tafakhori, Sajad Shafiee, Sara Ranji","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03841-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vestibular schwannoma is the most common neoplasm located at the skull base. The therapeutic strategy for managing vestibular schwannoma is formulated based on individual patient characteristics and specific imaging findings. Recently, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to predict treatment outcomes in the field of neurosurgical oncology.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of AI algorithms in predicting outcomes associated with various therapeutic strategies for vestibular schwannoma.</p><p><strong>Method and material: </strong>The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines, involving comprehensive data extraction from multiple databases, specifically PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, until January 31, 2025. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software version 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 21 studies. AI algorithms achieved an area under the curve of 0.80 in predicting microsurgery outcomes, with an accuracy (positive predictions regardless of whether they are positive or negative) of 81.5% and sensitivity (true positive rate) of 83%. In subgroup analysis, AI showed better accuracy for forecasting facial function than for hearing preservation following microsurgery. For tumor control after radiosurgery, the AUC was 0.722 with an accuracy of 58.5%, while predicting tumor progression after conservative management yielded an AUC of 0.912 and 87.5% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI algorithms can be valuable prognostic tools for evaluating outcomes across therapeutic interventions. Nonetheless, further prospective studies are essential to establish the optimal model for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of artificial intelligence in predicting the clinical outcomes associated with different therapeutic approaches for vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Javadnia, Afshan Davari, Nadia Zameni, Amir Reza Bahadori, Sara Ahmadi, Sara Mohammadian, Abbas Tafakhori, Sajad Shafiee, Sara Ranji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03841-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vestibular schwannoma is the most common neoplasm located at the skull base. The therapeutic strategy for managing vestibular schwannoma is formulated based on individual patient characteristics and specific imaging findings. Recently, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to predict treatment outcomes in the field of neurosurgical oncology.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of AI algorithms in predicting outcomes associated with various therapeutic strategies for vestibular schwannoma.</p><p><strong>Method and material: </strong>The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines, involving comprehensive data extraction from multiple databases, specifically PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, until January 31, 2025. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software version 3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 21 studies. AI algorithms achieved an area under the curve of 0.80 in predicting microsurgery outcomes, with an accuracy (positive predictions regardless of whether they are positive or negative) of 81.5% and sensitivity (true positive rate) of 83%. In subgroup analysis, AI showed better accuracy for forecasting facial function than for hearing preservation following microsurgery. For tumor control after radiosurgery, the AUC was 0.722 with an accuracy of 58.5%, while predicting tumor progression after conservative management yielded an AUC of 0.912 and 87.5% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI algorithms can be valuable prognostic tools for evaluating outcomes across therapeutic interventions. Nonetheless, further prospective studies are essential to establish the optimal model for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03841-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03841-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前庭神经鞘瘤是位于颅底最常见的肿瘤。管理前庭神经鞘瘤的治疗策略是根据个体患者的特点和特定的影像学结果制定的。近年来,人们对应用人工智能(AI)预测神经外科肿瘤治疗结果的兴趣日益浓厚。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估人工智能算法在预测前庭神经鞘瘤各种治疗策略相关结果方面的功效。方法和材料:该研究在PRISMA指导下进行,涉及从多个数据库中提取综合数据,特别是PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science和Cochrane Library,截止到2025年1月31日。采用综合meta分析(Comprehensive Meta-analysis, CMA)软件3.0进行统计分析。结果:本系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了21项研究的数据。人工智能算法预测显微手术结果的曲线下面积为0.80,准确率(无论阳性还是阴性的阳性预测)为81.5%,灵敏度(真阳性率)为83%。在亚组分析中,人工智能在预测显微手术后面部功能方面的准确性优于听力保护。对于放疗后的肿瘤控制,AUC为0.722,准确率为58.5%,而预测保守治疗后肿瘤进展的AUC为0.912,准确率为87.5%。结论:人工智能算法可以作为评估治疗干预结果的有价值的预后工具。然而,为了建立临床应用的最佳模型,进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的。
The role of artificial intelligence in predicting the clinical outcomes associated with different therapeutic approaches for vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Vestibular schwannoma is the most common neoplasm located at the skull base. The therapeutic strategy for managing vestibular schwannoma is formulated based on individual patient characteristics and specific imaging findings. Recently, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to predict treatment outcomes in the field of neurosurgical oncology.
Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of AI algorithms in predicting outcomes associated with various therapeutic strategies for vestibular schwannoma.
Method and material: The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines, involving comprehensive data extraction from multiple databases, specifically PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, until January 31, 2025. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software version 3.0.
Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 21 studies. AI algorithms achieved an area under the curve of 0.80 in predicting microsurgery outcomes, with an accuracy (positive predictions regardless of whether they are positive or negative) of 81.5% and sensitivity (true positive rate) of 83%. In subgroup analysis, AI showed better accuracy for forecasting facial function than for hearing preservation following microsurgery. For tumor control after radiosurgery, the AUC was 0.722 with an accuracy of 58.5%, while predicting tumor progression after conservative management yielded an AUC of 0.912 and 87.5% accuracy.
Conclusion: AI algorithms can be valuable prognostic tools for evaluating outcomes across therapeutic interventions. Nonetheless, further prospective studies are essential to establish the optimal model for clinical application.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.