cellavision®dc-1v检测非洲象白细胞差异的性能

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Irène Vonfeld, Milan Thorel, Gilles Maurer, Antoine Leclerc
{"title":"cellavision®dc-1v检测非洲象白细胞差异的性能","authors":"Irène Vonfeld, Milan Thorel, Gilles Maurer, Antoine Leclerc","doi":"10.1638/2024-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elephants have unique leukocyte morphology, making automated differentiation challenging and unreliable. Manual white blood cell (WBC) differentials are the gold standard in these species. Automated blood film reading systems are now available for blood smear evaluation. The CellaVision<sup>®</sup> DC-1V is a computer-controlled microscope that allows WBC preclassification by digital capture and cell recognition, and clinician verification and correction to ensure result accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of this analyzer in captive African elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) as compared to the gold standard. Sixty blood smears from 7 captive elephants were blindly analyzed twice by 3 observers (MAN: manual counts), and the analyzer (RAW: raw CellaVision DC-1V counts). Analyzer's counts were corrected by each operator (MOD: modified CellaVision DC-1V counts). Linear regressions and correlation coefficients were used to compare MAN, RAW, and MOD. Statistical differences were observed across cell types between all 3 methods (p < 0.01). Heterophil and band heterophil counts were more consistent across observers and methods than lymphocyte and monocyte counts. MOD were considered acceptable for monocytes, but not granulocytes and lymphocytes when compared to limits established for domestic species. The discrepancy between consistency and acceptability may stem from elephants being a monocyte-predominant species, suggesting that limits of acceptability could differ from those applied to domestic species. Time required for the differentials was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) and differentials were subjectively easier to perform when using the analyzer (MOD). The CellaVision<sup>®</sup> DC-1V may be a useful tool for WBC differentials in African elephants, improving both accuracy and time efficiency when corrected by a trained observer.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"56 3","pages":"586-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERFORMANCE OF THE CELLAVISION<sup>®</sup> DC-1V FOR WHITE BLOOD CELL DIFFERENTIALS IN AFRICAN ELEPHANT (<i>LOXODONTA AFRICANA</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Irène Vonfeld, Milan Thorel, Gilles Maurer, Antoine Leclerc\",\"doi\":\"10.1638/2024-0139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elephants have unique leukocyte morphology, making automated differentiation challenging and unreliable. Manual white blood cell (WBC) differentials are the gold standard in these species. Automated blood film reading systems are now available for blood smear evaluation. The CellaVision<sup>®</sup> DC-1V is a computer-controlled microscope that allows WBC preclassification by digital capture and cell recognition, and clinician verification and correction to ensure result accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of this analyzer in captive African elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) as compared to the gold standard. Sixty blood smears from 7 captive elephants were blindly analyzed twice by 3 observers (MAN: manual counts), and the analyzer (RAW: raw CellaVision DC-1V counts). Analyzer's counts were corrected by each operator (MOD: modified CellaVision DC-1V counts). Linear regressions and correlation coefficients were used to compare MAN, RAW, and MOD. Statistical differences were observed across cell types between all 3 methods (p < 0.01). Heterophil and band heterophil counts were more consistent across observers and methods than lymphocyte and monocyte counts. MOD were considered acceptable for monocytes, but not granulocytes and lymphocytes when compared to limits established for domestic species. The discrepancy between consistency and acceptability may stem from elephants being a monocyte-predominant species, suggesting that limits of acceptability could differ from those applied to domestic species. Time required for the differentials was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) and differentials were subjectively easier to perform when using the analyzer (MOD). The CellaVision<sup>®</sup> DC-1V may be a useful tool for WBC differentials in African elephants, improving both accuracy and time efficiency when corrected by a trained observer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"586-598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大象有独特的白细胞形态,使自动分化具有挑战性和不可靠。人工白细胞(WBC)鉴别是这些物种的金标准。自动血膜读取系统现在可用于血液涂片评估。CellaVision®DC-1V是一种计算机控制的显微镜,可通过数字捕获和细胞识别进行白细胞预分类,临床医生验证和校正以确保结果准确性。本研究的目的是评估该分析仪在圈养非洲象(Loxodonta africana)中的性能,并与金标准进行比较。7头圈养大象的60份血液涂片由3名观察员(MAN:人工计数)和分析仪(RAW:原始CellaVision DC-1V计数)进行两次盲法分析。分析仪的计数由每个操作员校正(MOD:改良CellaVision DC-1V计数)。使用线性回归和相关系数对MAN、RAW和MOD进行比较。三种方法在细胞类型上均有统计学差异(p < 0.01)。与淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数相比,嗜异性粒细胞和带状嗜异性粒细胞计数在观察者和方法上更为一致。与国内物种的限制相比,MOD被认为对单核细胞是可以接受的,但对粒细胞和淋巴细胞则不行。一致性和可接受性之间的差异可能源于大象是单核细胞占优势的物种,这表明可接受性的限制可能与适用于家养物种的限制不同。鉴别所需时间显著缩短(p < 0.01),使用分析仪(MOD)时,主观上更容易进行鉴别。CellaVision®DC-1V可能是非洲象白细胞鉴别的有用工具,在经过训练的观察者校正后,可以提高准确性和时间效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERFORMANCE OF THE CELLAVISION® DC-1V FOR WHITE BLOOD CELL DIFFERENTIALS IN AFRICAN ELEPHANT (LOXODONTA AFRICANA).

Elephants have unique leukocyte morphology, making automated differentiation challenging and unreliable. Manual white blood cell (WBC) differentials are the gold standard in these species. Automated blood film reading systems are now available for blood smear evaluation. The CellaVision® DC-1V is a computer-controlled microscope that allows WBC preclassification by digital capture and cell recognition, and clinician verification and correction to ensure result accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of this analyzer in captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana) as compared to the gold standard. Sixty blood smears from 7 captive elephants were blindly analyzed twice by 3 observers (MAN: manual counts), and the analyzer (RAW: raw CellaVision DC-1V counts). Analyzer's counts were corrected by each operator (MOD: modified CellaVision DC-1V counts). Linear regressions and correlation coefficients were used to compare MAN, RAW, and MOD. Statistical differences were observed across cell types between all 3 methods (p < 0.01). Heterophil and band heterophil counts were more consistent across observers and methods than lymphocyte and monocyte counts. MOD were considered acceptable for monocytes, but not granulocytes and lymphocytes when compared to limits established for domestic species. The discrepancy between consistency and acceptability may stem from elephants being a monocyte-predominant species, suggesting that limits of acceptability could differ from those applied to domestic species. Time required for the differentials was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) and differentials were subjectively easier to perform when using the analyzer (MOD). The CellaVision® DC-1V may be a useful tool for WBC differentials in African elephants, improving both accuracy and time efficiency when corrected by a trained observer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信