{"title":"农村居住对SLE临床结果的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Ryuichi Ohta, Ryu Yoshinori, Chiaki Sano, Kunihiro Ichinose","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2025-001725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations and variable outcomes. Geographic factors such as rural residence may influence disease severity, access to care and treatment adherence, yet evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of rurality on clinical outcomes in adults with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for observational studies published up to May 2025 that assessed the association between rural residence and clinical outcomes in SLE. Eligible studies included adult patients with SLE and reported at least one relevant outcome stratified by rurality. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, data were extracted on study characteristics, definitions of rurality, outcome domains and risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, including over 34 000 participants from the USA, Greece, China, Egypt, Puerto Rico and Latin America (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus cohort), met inclusion criteria. Definitions of rurality varied widely, encompassing administrative classifications, demographic thresholds and self-reported residence. Rural residence was often associated with delayed diagnosis, higher disease activity, lower physical quality of life, increased hospital readmissions and poorer medication adherence. Survival findings were mixed, and one study found no rural disadvantage where specialised care was available. Methodological quality was generally moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across diverse settings, rural SLE populations frequently experience worse outcomes, although this is not universal and appears to be strongly influenced by structural disadvantages rather than geography alone. Standardised definitions of rurality and multidimensional measurement approaches are needed to improve comparability and guide effective interventions. Targeted strategies-such as telemedicine, outreach programmes and policies addressing healthcare access-may help reduce inequities in SLE care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of rural residence on clinical outcomes in SLE: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichi Ohta, Ryu Yoshinori, Chiaki Sano, Kunihiro Ichinose\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2025-001725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations and variable outcomes. Geographic factors such as rural residence may influence disease severity, access to care and treatment adherence, yet evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of rurality on clinical outcomes in adults with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for observational studies published up to May 2025 that assessed the association between rural residence and clinical outcomes in SLE. Eligible studies included adult patients with SLE and reported at least one relevant outcome stratified by rurality. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, data were extracted on study characteristics, definitions of rurality, outcome domains and risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, including over 34 000 participants from the USA, Greece, China, Egypt, Puerto Rico and Latin America (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus cohort), met inclusion criteria. Definitions of rurality varied widely, encompassing administrative classifications, demographic thresholds and self-reported residence. Rural residence was often associated with delayed diagnosis, higher disease activity, lower physical quality of life, increased hospital readmissions and poorer medication adherence. Survival findings were mixed, and one study found no rural disadvantage where specialised care was available. Methodological quality was generally moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across diverse settings, rural SLE populations frequently experience worse outcomes, although this is not universal and appears to be strongly influenced by structural disadvantages rather than geography alone. Standardised definitions of rurality and multidimensional measurement approaches are needed to improve comparability and guide effective interventions. Targeted strategies-such as telemedicine, outreach programmes and policies addressing healthcare access-may help reduce inequities in SLE care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001725\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:SLE是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,具有不同的表现和不同的结局。农村居住等地理因素可能影响疾病严重程度、获得护理和治疗依从性,但证据仍然不完整。本系统综述旨在评估乡村性对成人SLE患者临床结果的影响。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,检索截至2025年5月发表的观察性研究,这些研究评估了农村居住与SLE临床结局之间的关系。符合条件的研究包括SLE的成年患者,并报告了至少一个按农村分层的相关结果。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,提取有关研究特征、乡村性定义、结果域和偏倚风险的数据。由于研究设计和结果的异质性,我们进行了叙事综合。结果:8项研究符合纳入标准,包括来自美国、希腊、中国、埃及、波多黎各和拉丁美洲(Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus队列)的34000多名参与者。乡村性的定义差异很大,包括行政分类、人口阈值和自我报告的居住地。农村居住往往与诊断延迟、疾病活动性较高、身体生活质量较低、再入院率增加和药物依从性较差有关。生存调查结果好坏参半,一项研究发现,在有专门护理的农村地区,没有任何劣势。方法质量一般为中等至高。结论:在不同的环境中,农村SLE人群经常经历更糟糕的结果,尽管这不是普遍的,而且似乎受到结构性劣势的强烈影响,而不仅仅是地理位置。为了提高可比性和指导有效的干预措施,需要对乡村性进行标准化定义和多维度测量方法。有针对性的策略,如远程医疗、外展规划和解决医疗保健可及性的政策,可能有助于减少SLE治疗中的不公平现象。
Impact of rural residence on clinical outcomes in SLE: a systematic review.
Background: SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations and variable outcomes. Geographic factors such as rural residence may influence disease severity, access to care and treatment adherence, yet evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of rurality on clinical outcomes in adults with SLE.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for observational studies published up to May 2025 that assessed the association between rural residence and clinical outcomes in SLE. Eligible studies included adult patients with SLE and reported at least one relevant outcome stratified by rurality. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, data were extracted on study characteristics, definitions of rurality, outcome domains and risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was conducted.
Results: Eight studies, including over 34 000 participants from the USA, Greece, China, Egypt, Puerto Rico and Latin America (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus cohort), met inclusion criteria. Definitions of rurality varied widely, encompassing administrative classifications, demographic thresholds and self-reported residence. Rural residence was often associated with delayed diagnosis, higher disease activity, lower physical quality of life, increased hospital readmissions and poorer medication adherence. Survival findings were mixed, and one study found no rural disadvantage where specialised care was available. Methodological quality was generally moderate to high.
Conclusion: Across diverse settings, rural SLE populations frequently experience worse outcomes, although this is not universal and appears to be strongly influenced by structural disadvantages rather than geography alone. Standardised definitions of rurality and multidimensional measurement approaches are needed to improve comparability and guide effective interventions. Targeted strategies-such as telemedicine, outreach programmes and policies addressing healthcare access-may help reduce inequities in SLE care.
期刊介绍:
Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.