18年间(2004-2022年)同一机构50只长颈鹿(giraffa camelopardalis)牧场固定的发病率和死亡率

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Julie Swenson, Molly Shea, Adam Eyres, Holly J Haefele
{"title":"18年间(2004-2022年)同一机构50只长颈鹿(giraffa camelopardalis)牧场固定的发病率和死亡率","authors":"Julie Swenson, Molly Shea, Adam Eyres, Holly J Haefele","doi":"10.1638/2024-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giraffe (<i>Giraffa camelopardalis)</i> are considered high risk for anesthetic complications. Interestingly, few recent peer-reviewed studies have evaluated morbidity and mortality in immobilized giraffe under managed care. Given that giraffe may require anesthesia due to their large size and potential to cause harm, a more scientific evaluation of the risks associated with the various types of immobilization procedures is warranted. Pasture immobilizations are often considered particularly high risk due to lack of control over the animal's environment. Other perceived risks include interference by conspecifics and a delay in being able to obtain head control of the anesthetized animal. Fossil Rim Wildlife Center has a long history of pasture immobilizations in giraffe, allowing for a standardized procedure that has varied little over its 35-yr history. This allows for the unique opportunity to evaluate morbidity and mortality associated with pasture immobilizations, while minimizing other variables. A retrospective evaluation of pasture immobilizations in giraffe over 18-yr was performed (starting with the onset of consistent electronic medical records). During this period, 50 pasture immobilizations were reported. No life-threatening complications occurred in any cases. Ages ranged from 3 mon to 33 yr, with 24% of animals being over the age of 25. Duration of anesthesia from darting to reversal averaged 68 min (minimum = 24 min; maximum = 157 min). Five procedures were for the expressed intent of euthanasia. In the remaining 45 procedures, no mortalities were reported. This study shows a minimal risk associated with pasture immobilizations when performed with experienced staff under consistent circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"56 3","pages":"525-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY ASSOCIATED WITH 50 INDIVIDUAL PASTURE IMMOBILIZATIONS OF GIRAFFE (<i>GIRAFFA CAMELOPARDALIS</i>) OVER 18 YEARS (2004-2022) AT A SINGLE INSTITUTION.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Swenson, Molly Shea, Adam Eyres, Holly J Haefele\",\"doi\":\"10.1638/2024-0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Giraffe (<i>Giraffa camelopardalis)</i> are considered high risk for anesthetic complications. Interestingly, few recent peer-reviewed studies have evaluated morbidity and mortality in immobilized giraffe under managed care. Given that giraffe may require anesthesia due to their large size and potential to cause harm, a more scientific evaluation of the risks associated with the various types of immobilization procedures is warranted. Pasture immobilizations are often considered particularly high risk due to lack of control over the animal's environment. Other perceived risks include interference by conspecifics and a delay in being able to obtain head control of the anesthetized animal. Fossil Rim Wildlife Center has a long history of pasture immobilizations in giraffe, allowing for a standardized procedure that has varied little over its 35-yr history. This allows for the unique opportunity to evaluate morbidity and mortality associated with pasture immobilizations, while minimizing other variables. A retrospective evaluation of pasture immobilizations in giraffe over 18-yr was performed (starting with the onset of consistent electronic medical records). During this period, 50 pasture immobilizations were reported. No life-threatening complications occurred in any cases. Ages ranged from 3 mon to 33 yr, with 24% of animals being over the age of 25. Duration of anesthesia from darting to reversal averaged 68 min (minimum = 24 min; maximum = 157 min). Five procedures were for the expressed intent of euthanasia. In the remaining 45 procedures, no mortalities were reported. This study shows a minimal risk associated with pasture immobilizations when performed with experienced staff under consistent circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"525-532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长颈鹿(Giraffa camelopardalis)被认为是麻醉并发症的高风险。有趣的是,最近很少有同行评议的研究评估了管理护理下固定长颈鹿的发病率和死亡率。由于长颈鹿体型较大,可能造成伤害,因此可能需要麻醉,因此有必要对各种固定手术的风险进行更科学的评估。由于缺乏对动物环境的控制,牧场固定通常被认为是特别高风险的。其他可感知的风险包括同种麻醉药的干扰和被麻醉动物头部控制的延迟。化石边缘野生动物中心在长颈鹿的牧场固定方面有着悠久的历史,允许一个标准化的程序,在其35年的历史中几乎没有变化。这为评估与牧场固定相关的发病率和死亡率提供了独特的机会,同时最大限度地减少了其他变量。回顾性评估了18岁以上长颈鹿的牧场固定(从一致的电子医疗记录开始)。在此期间,据报道发生了50起牧场固定事件。所有病例均未发生危及生命的并发症。年龄从3个月到33岁不等,其中24%的动物年龄超过25岁。从起跳到逆转的麻醉时间平均为68分钟(最短24分钟,最长157分钟)。五个程序是为了表达安乐死的意图。在其余45例手术中,无死亡报告。这项研究表明,在一致的情况下,由经验丰富的工作人员进行牧场固定的风险最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY ASSOCIATED WITH 50 INDIVIDUAL PASTURE IMMOBILIZATIONS OF GIRAFFE (GIRAFFA CAMELOPARDALIS) OVER 18 YEARS (2004-2022) AT A SINGLE INSTITUTION.

Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) are considered high risk for anesthetic complications. Interestingly, few recent peer-reviewed studies have evaluated morbidity and mortality in immobilized giraffe under managed care. Given that giraffe may require anesthesia due to their large size and potential to cause harm, a more scientific evaluation of the risks associated with the various types of immobilization procedures is warranted. Pasture immobilizations are often considered particularly high risk due to lack of control over the animal's environment. Other perceived risks include interference by conspecifics and a delay in being able to obtain head control of the anesthetized animal. Fossil Rim Wildlife Center has a long history of pasture immobilizations in giraffe, allowing for a standardized procedure that has varied little over its 35-yr history. This allows for the unique opportunity to evaluate morbidity and mortality associated with pasture immobilizations, while minimizing other variables. A retrospective evaluation of pasture immobilizations in giraffe over 18-yr was performed (starting with the onset of consistent electronic medical records). During this period, 50 pasture immobilizations were reported. No life-threatening complications occurred in any cases. Ages ranged from 3 mon to 33 yr, with 24% of animals being over the age of 25. Duration of anesthesia from darting to reversal averaged 68 min (minimum = 24 min; maximum = 157 min). Five procedures were for the expressed intent of euthanasia. In the remaining 45 procedures, no mortalities were reported. This study shows a minimal risk associated with pasture immobilizations when performed with experienced staff under consistent circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信