双侧三焦人工晶状体配对两种互补光分布后的视力结果。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Pilar Yébana, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David Teren, Antonio Martínez-Abad, Mario Cantó-Cerdán
{"title":"双侧三焦人工晶状体配对两种互补光分布后的视力结果。","authors":"Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Pilar Yébana, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David Teren, Antonio Martínez-Abad, Mario Cantó-Cerdán","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess visual, refractive, and optical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction following bilateral implantation of two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) sharing the same optical architecture but differing in their photopic light distribution: Vivinex Gemetric and Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients underwent bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. Each patient received the Gemetric IOL in the dominant eye and the Gemetric Plus in the non-dominant eye. Examinations included full refractive and visual assessment, defocus curves, mesopic contrast sensitivity, pyramidal aberrometry, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (Quality of Vision Questionnaire and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire), with follow-up at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired IOL combination provided a visual acuity of 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better between defocus levels of +0.50 to -3.00 diopters (D). Maximum mean value of visual acuity was obtained at 0.00 D (-0.07 ± 0.05 logMAR) and a second peak was found at -3.00 D (0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR). It was 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR at a defocus level of -1.50 D. Monocular corrected near visual acuity was significantly better for the Gemetric Plus IOL (<i>P</i> = .03). Better monocular distance visual function was obtained with the Gemetric IOL (<i>P</i> = .05). Contrast sensitivity remained within or above age-matched normative values. Ocular aberrations remained low and stable, with no significant differences between lens types. Ninety-six percent of patients reported no or minor difficulties in conducting prolonged near work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pairing strategy of the Vivinex Gemetric and Gemetric Plus trifocal IOLs delivers excellent visual acuity across all distances, preserves contrast sensitivity, and maintains a high level of optical quality and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 10","pages":"e1106-e1114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens Pairing Two Complementary Optic Light Distributions.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Pilar Yébana, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David Teren, Antonio Martínez-Abad, Mario Cantó-Cerdán\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess visual, refractive, and optical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction following bilateral implantation of two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) sharing the same optical architecture but differing in their photopic light distribution: Vivinex Gemetric and Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients underwent bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. Each patient received the Gemetric IOL in the dominant eye and the Gemetric Plus in the non-dominant eye. Examinations included full refractive and visual assessment, defocus curves, mesopic contrast sensitivity, pyramidal aberrometry, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (Quality of Vision Questionnaire and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire), with follow-up at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired IOL combination provided a visual acuity of 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better between defocus levels of +0.50 to -3.00 diopters (D). Maximum mean value of visual acuity was obtained at 0.00 D (-0.07 ± 0.05 logMAR) and a second peak was found at -3.00 D (0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR). It was 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR at a defocus level of -1.50 D. Monocular corrected near visual acuity was significantly better for the Gemetric Plus IOL (<i>P</i> = .03). Better monocular distance visual function was obtained with the Gemetric IOL (<i>P</i> = .05). Contrast sensitivity remained within or above age-matched normative values. Ocular aberrations remained low and stable, with no significant differences between lens types. Ninety-six percent of patients reported no or minor difficulties in conducting prolonged near work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pairing strategy of the Vivinex Gemetric and Gemetric Plus trifocal IOLs delivers excellent visual acuity across all distances, preserves contrast sensitivity, and maintains a high level of optical quality and patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 10\",\"pages\":\"e1106-e1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估双侧植入两个具有相同光学结构但光分布不同的三焦人工晶状体(Vivinex Gemetric和Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics))后的视力、屈光和光学结果以及患者报告的满意度。方法:这是一个观察性的、前瞻性的、连续的、非比较的病例系列。27例患者54眼行双侧白内障手术或屈光晶体置换术。每位患者均接受优势眼的几何人工晶状体植入,非优势眼的几何人工晶状体植入。检查包括全屈光和视力评估、离焦曲线、中观对比敏感度、锥体像差测量和经过验证的患者报告的结果测量(视力质量问卷和近活动视力问卷),随访时间为1天、1、3和6个月。结果:配对的IOL组合提供了0.15的最小分辨角(logMAR)的对数或更好的离焦水平在+0.50至-3.00屈光度(D)之间。视力平均值在0.00 D时达到最大值(-0.07±0.05 logMAR),第二个峰值出现在-3.00 D时(0.07±0.09 logMAR)。离焦水平为-1.50 d时,单眼矫正近视力为0.13±0.10 logMAR (P = 0.03)。晶状体人工晶状体具有较好的单眼距离视觉功能(P = 0.05)。对比敏感度保持在或高于年龄匹配的正常值。眼像差保持较低且稳定,不同晶状体类型间无显著差异。96%的患者报告在长时间近距离工作时没有或只有轻微的困难。结论:Vivinex Gemetric和Gemetric Plus三焦人工晶体的配对策略在所有距离内提供了出色的视力,保持了对比灵敏度,并保持了高水平的光学质量和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens Pairing Two Complementary Optic Light Distributions.

Purpose: To assess visual, refractive, and optical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction following bilateral implantation of two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) sharing the same optical architecture but differing in their photopic light distribution: Vivinex Gemetric and Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics).

Methods: This was an observational, prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients underwent bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. Each patient received the Gemetric IOL in the dominant eye and the Gemetric Plus in the non-dominant eye. Examinations included full refractive and visual assessment, defocus curves, mesopic contrast sensitivity, pyramidal aberrometry, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (Quality of Vision Questionnaire and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire), with follow-up at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months.

Results: The paired IOL combination provided a visual acuity of 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better between defocus levels of +0.50 to -3.00 diopters (D). Maximum mean value of visual acuity was obtained at 0.00 D (-0.07 ± 0.05 logMAR) and a second peak was found at -3.00 D (0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR). It was 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR at a defocus level of -1.50 D. Monocular corrected near visual acuity was significantly better for the Gemetric Plus IOL (P = .03). Better monocular distance visual function was obtained with the Gemetric IOL (P = .05). Contrast sensitivity remained within or above age-matched normative values. Ocular aberrations remained low and stable, with no significant differences between lens types. Ninety-six percent of patients reported no or minor difficulties in conducting prolonged near work.

Conclusions: The pairing strategy of the Vivinex Gemetric and Gemetric Plus trifocal IOLs delivers excellent visual acuity across all distances, preserves contrast sensitivity, and maintains a high level of optical quality and patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信