年龄相关性白内障衍射扩展焦深与单焦点人工晶体植入术后动态视力的比较

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tingyi Wu, Yuexin Wang, Yuanhong Li, Yuanting Li, Xiaodan Jiang, Xuemin Li
{"title":"年龄相关性白内障衍射扩展焦深与单焦点人工晶体植入术后动态视力的比较","authors":"Tingyi Wu, Yuexin Wang, Yuanhong Li, Yuanting Li, Xiaodan Jiang, Xuemin Li","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250724-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) after implantation of diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Inc) or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age-related cataract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 patients with 218 eyes diagnosed as having age-related cataract were assessed for eligibility, and 80 patients with 160 eyes (40 patients each in EDOF and monofocal groups) were included in this study. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed according to grouping. The monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) static visual acuity, and corrected DVA of 20 and 80 degrees per second (dps) were examined 1 month postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The postoperative monocular (<i>P</i> = .003) and binocular (<i>P</i> = .004) UNVA were significantly better in the EDOF group than the monofocal group. The binocular 80 dps DVA was significantly better in EDOF group (<i>P</i> = .042), whereas no statistical differences were observed in monocular 20 dps DVA, monocular 80 dps DVA, or binocular 20 dps DVA between two groups (all <i>P</i> > .05). The multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that postoperative binocular mean sphere (<i>P</i> = .026), binocular mean axial length (<i>P</i> = .047), and age (<i>P</i> = .028) were significantly associated with binocular 80 dps DVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed that the diffractive EDOF IOL provided better distance DVA than the monofocal IOL for patients with age-related cataract when observing high-speed moving targets binocularly. The research provided the basis of dynamic vision-guided IOL selection for patients with cataract.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 10","pages":"e1060-e1068"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Dynamic Visual Acuity After Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation for Patients With Age-Related Cataract.\",\"authors\":\"Tingyi Wu, Yuexin Wang, Yuanhong Li, Yuanting Li, Xiaodan Jiang, Xuemin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250724-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) after implantation of diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Inc) or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age-related cataract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 patients with 218 eyes diagnosed as having age-related cataract were assessed for eligibility, and 80 patients with 160 eyes (40 patients each in EDOF and monofocal groups) were included in this study. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed according to grouping. The monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) static visual acuity, and corrected DVA of 20 and 80 degrees per second (dps) were examined 1 month postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The postoperative monocular (<i>P</i> = .003) and binocular (<i>P</i> = .004) UNVA were significantly better in the EDOF group than the monofocal group. The binocular 80 dps DVA was significantly better in EDOF group (<i>P</i> = .042), whereas no statistical differences were observed in monocular 20 dps DVA, monocular 80 dps DVA, or binocular 20 dps DVA between two groups (all <i>P</i> > .05). The multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that postoperative binocular mean sphere (<i>P</i> = .026), binocular mean axial length (<i>P</i> = .047), and age (<i>P</i> = .028) were significantly associated with binocular 80 dps DVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed that the diffractive EDOF IOL provided better distance DVA than the monofocal IOL for patients with age-related cataract when observing high-speed moving targets binocularly. The research provided the basis of dynamic vision-guided IOL selection for patients with cataract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 10\",\"pages\":\"e1060-e1068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250724-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250724-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较老年性白内障患者植入TECNIS Symfony ZXR00衍射扩展焦深(EDOF)或单焦人工晶体(IOL)后的动态视力(DVA)。方法:选取年龄相关性白内障患者109例,218眼,共80例,160眼(EDOF组和单焦点组各40例)。按分组行超声乳化术及人工晶状体植入术。术后1个月检查单眼和双眼未校正距离(UDVA)、中间(UIVA)和近静态视力(UNVA),校正后的DVA为20度/秒和80度/秒(dps)。结果:EDOF组术后单眼(P = 0.003)和双眼(P = 0.004) UNVA明显优于单眼组。EDOF组双眼80 dps DVA显著优于EDOF组(P = 0.042),而两组单眼20 dps DVA、单眼80 dps DVA、双眼20 dps DVA差异无统计学意义(P均为0.05)。多因素线性回归分析显示,术后双眼平均球(P = 0.026)、双眼平均轴长(P = 0.047)、年龄(P = 0.028)与双眼80 dps DVA有显著相关。结论:对于年龄相关性白内障患者,在双眼观察高速运动目标时,衍射EDOF人工晶状体比单焦人工晶状体提供更好的距离DVA。本研究为动态视觉引导下白内障人工晶状体的选择提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Dynamic Visual Acuity After Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation for Patients With Age-Related Cataract.

Purpose: To compare the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) after implantation of diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Inc) or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with age-related cataract.

Methods: A total of 109 patients with 218 eyes diagnosed as having age-related cataract were assessed for eligibility, and 80 patients with 160 eyes (40 patients each in EDOF and monofocal groups) were included in this study. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed according to grouping. The monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) static visual acuity, and corrected DVA of 20 and 80 degrees per second (dps) were examined 1 month postoperatively.

Results: The postoperative monocular (P = .003) and binocular (P = .004) UNVA were significantly better in the EDOF group than the monofocal group. The binocular 80 dps DVA was significantly better in EDOF group (P = .042), whereas no statistical differences were observed in monocular 20 dps DVA, monocular 80 dps DVA, or binocular 20 dps DVA between two groups (all P > .05). The multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that postoperative binocular mean sphere (P = .026), binocular mean axial length (P = .047), and age (P = .028) were significantly associated with binocular 80 dps DVA.

Conclusions: The study revealed that the diffractive EDOF IOL provided better distance DVA than the monofocal IOL for patients with age-related cataract when observing high-speed moving targets binocularly. The research provided the basis of dynamic vision-guided IOL selection for patients with cataract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信