腹腔镜肝切除术中症状性静脉气体栓塞的发生率及危险因素。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Walid Hadji, Nassiba Beghdadi, Chady Salloum, Claire Goumard, Safi Dokmak, Chetana Lim, Stéphanie Roullet, Rania Bounab, Djillali Annane, Mickaël Lesurtel, Olivier Scatton, Daniel Cherqui, Marc Antoine Allard
{"title":"腹腔镜肝切除术中症状性静脉气体栓塞的发生率及危险因素。","authors":"Walid Hadji, Nassiba Beghdadi, Chady Salloum, Claire Goumard, Safi Dokmak, Chetana Lim, Stéphanie Roullet, Rania Bounab, Djillali Annane, Mickaël Lesurtel, Olivier Scatton, Daniel Cherqui, Marc Antoine Allard","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors of symptomatic venous gas embolism (GE) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are poorly known. The objective of this study was to report the incidence, risk factors, and morbidity of symptomatic GE during LLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who underwent LLR in 3 French centers over 3 years were retrospectively studied. All intraoperative events, with a focus on symptomatic venous GE, were collected and reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 518 LLR (507 patients) studied, 26 (5%) cases of symptomatic GE occurred. There was no GE-related death nor neurological sequelae after GE. The group of patients with GE and without GE was similar in terms of baseline characteristics, type of resection, and pneumoperitoneum pressure (≤ 12 mmHg in 93% of LLR) or intraoperative bleeding. Overall morbidity and length of stay were longer after GE. The probability of GE was higher under the Airseal insufflation system at 12 mmHg (7.1% with Airseal versus 0.59% with conventional systems, odds ratio 12.73, 95% confidence interval [2.66-228.4], p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that AirSeal at 12 mmHg or more is a risk factor for symptomatic venous GE. Insufflation with lower pressure or alternative insufflation systems should be evaluated during LLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Risk Factors of Symptomatic Venous Gas Embolism During Laparoscopic Liver Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Walid Hadji, Nassiba Beghdadi, Chady Salloum, Claire Goumard, Safi Dokmak, Chetana Lim, Stéphanie Roullet, Rania Bounab, Djillali Annane, Mickaël Lesurtel, Olivier Scatton, Daniel Cherqui, Marc Antoine Allard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors of symptomatic venous gas embolism (GE) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are poorly known. The objective of this study was to report the incidence, risk factors, and morbidity of symptomatic GE during LLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who underwent LLR in 3 French centers over 3 years were retrospectively studied. All intraoperative events, with a focus on symptomatic venous GE, were collected and reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 518 LLR (507 patients) studied, 26 (5%) cases of symptomatic GE occurred. There was no GE-related death nor neurological sequelae after GE. The group of patients with GE and without GE was similar in terms of baseline characteristics, type of resection, and pneumoperitoneum pressure (≤ 12 mmHg in 93% of LLR) or intraoperative bleeding. Overall morbidity and length of stay were longer after GE. The probability of GE was higher under the Airseal insufflation system at 12 mmHg (7.1% with Airseal versus 0.59% with conventional systems, odds ratio 12.73, 95% confidence interval [2.66-228.4], p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that AirSeal at 12 mmHg or more is a risk factor for symptomatic venous GE. Insufflation with lower pressure or alternative insufflation systems should be evaluated during LLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)中症状性静脉气体栓塞(GE)的危险因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是报告LLR期间症状性GE的发生率、危险因素和发病率。方法:回顾性研究所有在法国3个中心连续3年接受LLR的患者。收集并回顾所有术中事件,重点是症状性静脉GE。结果:在518例LLR(507例)患者中,26例(5%)出现了症状性GE。GE后无GE相关死亡或神经系统后遗症。GE组和非GE组在基线特征、切除类型、气腹压力(93%的LLR≤12 mmHg)或术中出血方面相似。GE后的总体发病率和住院时间更长。在12 mmHg的Airseal充气系统下,GE的概率更高(Airseal为7.1%,常规系统为0.59%,优势比为12.73,95%可信区间[2.66-228.4],p = 0.013)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,12mmhg或更高的AirSeal是症状性静脉GE的危险因素。在LLR期间,应评估低压充气或替代充气系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and Risk Factors of Symptomatic Venous Gas Embolism During Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Background: Risk factors of symptomatic venous gas embolism (GE) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are poorly known. The objective of this study was to report the incidence, risk factors, and morbidity of symptomatic GE during LLR.

Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent LLR in 3 French centers over 3 years were retrospectively studied. All intraoperative events, with a focus on symptomatic venous GE, were collected and reviewed.

Results: Among the 518 LLR (507 patients) studied, 26 (5%) cases of symptomatic GE occurred. There was no GE-related death nor neurological sequelae after GE. The group of patients with GE and without GE was similar in terms of baseline characteristics, type of resection, and pneumoperitoneum pressure (≤ 12 mmHg in 93% of LLR) or intraoperative bleeding. Overall morbidity and length of stay were longer after GE. The probability of GE was higher under the Airseal insufflation system at 12 mmHg (7.1% with Airseal versus 0.59% with conventional systems, odds ratio 12.73, 95% confidence interval [2.66-228.4], p = 0.013).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that AirSeal at 12 mmHg or more is a risk factor for symptomatic venous GE. Insufflation with lower pressure or alternative insufflation systems should be evaluated during LLR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信