用加速度计评价自由生活条件下的中强边界。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Pablo Rozier-Delgado, Hervé Di Domenico, Baptiste Morel
{"title":"用加速度计评价自由生活条件下的中强边界。","authors":"Pablo Rozier-Delgado, Hervé Di Domenico, Baptiste Morel","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2568284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) evaluations based on absolute cutoffs from accelerometer data are inappropriate for characterising physical capacities, given inter-individual variability. We developed a new method that evaluates an individual's MVPA boundary without difficult exhaustion tests by estimating the critical intensity in daily activities using accelerometers. Thirty-five participants with varying fitness levels wore a 3-axis accelerometer for 3-6 weeks. They performed a sub-maximal incremental walking test on a 15%-inclined treadmill, where the speed at 4 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> (S<sub>4 mM</sub>) was computed. A two-parameter critical intensity model was fitted to Dynamic Body Acceleration (DBA) records using quantile regression. The critical DBA (DBA<sub>C</sub>) was computed from this model and compared with the traditional absolute cutoff for MVPA. DBA<sub>C</sub> was a strong predictor of S<sub>4 mM</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.788) and, compared with individual characterisation, the traditional MVPA analysis resulted in a mean absolute error of 10:37 min/day (118%) and 12:07 min/day (26%) for time spent in vigorous and moderate activity, respectively. In conclusion, the individual DBA<sub>C</sub> computed from daily life activities without controlled laboratory tests accurately represents the severe intensity domain boundary. This method enhances the current absolute cutoff MVPA classification, which fails to accurately represent the time spent in intensity domains with individual physiological meanings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of moderate to vigorous boundary under free-living conditions with accelerometry.\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Rozier-Delgado, Hervé Di Domenico, Baptiste Morel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2568284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) evaluations based on absolute cutoffs from accelerometer data are inappropriate for characterising physical capacities, given inter-individual variability. We developed a new method that evaluates an individual's MVPA boundary without difficult exhaustion tests by estimating the critical intensity in daily activities using accelerometers. Thirty-five participants with varying fitness levels wore a 3-axis accelerometer for 3-6 weeks. They performed a sub-maximal incremental walking test on a 15%-inclined treadmill, where the speed at 4 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> (S<sub>4 mM</sub>) was computed. A two-parameter critical intensity model was fitted to Dynamic Body Acceleration (DBA) records using quantile regression. The critical DBA (DBA<sub>C</sub>) was computed from this model and compared with the traditional absolute cutoff for MVPA. DBA<sub>C</sub> was a strong predictor of S<sub>4 mM</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.788) and, compared with individual characterisation, the traditional MVPA analysis resulted in a mean absolute error of 10:37 min/day (118%) and 12:07 min/day (26%) for time spent in vigorous and moderate activity, respectively. In conclusion, the individual DBA<sub>C</sub> computed from daily life activities without controlled laboratory tests accurately represents the severe intensity domain boundary. This method enhances the current absolute cutoff MVPA classification, which fails to accurately represent the time spent in intensity domains with individual physiological meanings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2568284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2568284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到个体间的差异,基于加速度计数据的绝对截止值的每日中等至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)评估不适合表征身体能力。我们开发了一种新的方法,通过使用加速度计估计日常活动的临界强度来评估个人的MVPA边界,而无需进行困难的疲劳测试。35名健康水平各异的参与者在3-6周的时间里佩戴了3轴加速度计。他们在15%倾斜的跑步机上进行了次最大增量步行测试,计算了4 mmol·L-1 (S4 mM)的速度。采用分位数回归方法拟合了动态体加速度(DBA)记录的双参数临界强度模型。根据该模型计算了临界DBA (DBAC),并与传统的MVPA绝对截止值进行了比较。DBAC是S4 mM的强预测因子(r2 = 0.788),与个体特征相比,传统的MVPA分析在剧烈活动和中度活动时间上的平均绝对误差分别为10:37分钟/天(118%)和12:07分钟/天(26%)。总之,在没有受控实验室测试的情况下,从日常生活活动中计算的个体DBAC准确地代表了严重强度域边界。该方法改进了目前的绝对截断MVPA分类方法,该方法不能准确地表示在具有个体生理意义的强度域上花费的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of moderate to vigorous boundary under free-living conditions with accelerometry.

Daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) evaluations based on absolute cutoffs from accelerometer data are inappropriate for characterising physical capacities, given inter-individual variability. We developed a new method that evaluates an individual's MVPA boundary without difficult exhaustion tests by estimating the critical intensity in daily activities using accelerometers. Thirty-five participants with varying fitness levels wore a 3-axis accelerometer for 3-6 weeks. They performed a sub-maximal incremental walking test on a 15%-inclined treadmill, where the speed at 4 mmol·L-1 (S4 mM) was computed. A two-parameter critical intensity model was fitted to Dynamic Body Acceleration (DBA) records using quantile regression. The critical DBA (DBAC) was computed from this model and compared with the traditional absolute cutoff for MVPA. DBAC was a strong predictor of S4 mM (r2 = 0.788) and, compared with individual characterisation, the traditional MVPA analysis resulted in a mean absolute error of 10:37 min/day (118%) and 12:07 min/day (26%) for time spent in vigorous and moderate activity, respectively. In conclusion, the individual DBAC computed from daily life activities without controlled laboratory tests accurately represents the severe intensity domain boundary. This method enhances the current absolute cutoff MVPA classification, which fails to accurately represent the time spent in intensity domains with individual physiological meanings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信