了解医疗保健服务的挑战:从医疗保健提供者和生活在社会经济脆弱环境中的人的定性见解。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emilie Op de Beeck, Hannah Ledegen, Gytha Slechten, Josefien Van Olmen, Hans De Loof, Hilde Bastiaens, Caroline Masquillier
{"title":"了解医疗保健服务的挑战:从医疗保健提供者和生活在社会经济脆弱环境中的人的定性见解。","authors":"Emilie Op de Beeck, Hannah Ledegen, Gytha Slechten, Josefien Van Olmen, Hans De Loof, Hilde Bastiaens, Caroline Masquillier","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02613-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Equitable access to healthcare is fundamental to improving population health outcomes, yet persistent disparities leave many underserved, particularly those in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances. In Belgium, unmet healthcare needs are disproportionately concentrated among low-income groups, migrants and individuals with low educational attainment. These structural inequities are reflected in poorer health outcomes, including reduced life expectancy and limited access to essential services such as dental, mental, and specialist care. Existing research has primarily taken cross-sectional approaches, failing to capture how barriers accumulate over time. To address this gap, this study adopts a longitudinal perspective to explore the cumulative nature of healthcare access barriers among socio-economically vulnerable populations in Belgium. It also incorporates the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative longitudinal approach using semi-structured interviews at three time-points with 16 people living in socio-economically circumstances was conducted. In the same period, 17 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs), such as general practitioners (GPs), dentists, pharmacists and psychologists were carried out. The sampling strategy included a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, then reflexive thematic analysis was carried out to ensure a transparent and rigorous analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that barriers to accessing care accumulate over time, particularly in the context of a fragmented healthcare system. Individuals living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances often deprioritise their healthcare and need to repeatedly navigate the healthcare access continuum to address different health concerns, often involving multiple healthcare providers. Each iteration can introduce new provider-specific barriers, compounding the challenges and increasing the complexity of accessing healthcare. Participants with an informal social network or support from HCPs and societal organisations could temporarily overcome the barriers to access care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals the complex and cumulative barriers to healthcare access for socio-economically vulnerable individuals, including competing priorities, system fragmentation, and cultural and language challenges. While informal social networks provide some support, they are insufficient to address systemic issues. Integrating these networks with formal community outreach initiatives could improve coordination and access to healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding challenges in healthcare access: qualitative insights from healthcare providers and people living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances.\",\"authors\":\"Emilie Op de Beeck, Hannah Ledegen, Gytha Slechten, Josefien Van Olmen, Hans De Loof, Hilde Bastiaens, Caroline Masquillier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02613-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Equitable access to healthcare is fundamental to improving population health outcomes, yet persistent disparities leave many underserved, particularly those in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances. In Belgium, unmet healthcare needs are disproportionately concentrated among low-income groups, migrants and individuals with low educational attainment. These structural inequities are reflected in poorer health outcomes, including reduced life expectancy and limited access to essential services such as dental, mental, and specialist care. Existing research has primarily taken cross-sectional approaches, failing to capture how barriers accumulate over time. To address this gap, this study adopts a longitudinal perspective to explore the cumulative nature of healthcare access barriers among socio-economically vulnerable populations in Belgium. It also incorporates the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative longitudinal approach using semi-structured interviews at three time-points with 16 people living in socio-economically circumstances was conducted. In the same period, 17 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs), such as general practitioners (GPs), dentists, pharmacists and psychologists were carried out. The sampling strategy included a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, then reflexive thematic analysis was carried out to ensure a transparent and rigorous analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that barriers to accessing care accumulate over time, particularly in the context of a fragmented healthcare system. Individuals living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances often deprioritise their healthcare and need to repeatedly navigate the healthcare access continuum to address different health concerns, often involving multiple healthcare providers. Each iteration can introduce new provider-specific barriers, compounding the challenges and increasing the complexity of accessing healthcare. Participants with an informal social network or support from HCPs and societal organisations could temporarily overcome the barriers to access care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals the complex and cumulative barriers to healthcare access for socio-economically vulnerable individuals, including competing priorities, system fragmentation, and cultural and language challenges. While informal social networks provide some support, they are insufficient to address systemic issues. Integrating these networks with formal community outreach initiatives could improve coordination and access to healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02613-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02613-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:公平获得医疗保健是改善人口健康结果的基础,但持续存在的差距使许多人得不到充分服务,特别是那些处于社会经济弱势环境中的人。在比利时,未得到满足的保健需求不成比例地集中在低收入群体、移民和受教育程度低的个人身上。这些结构性不平等反映在较差的健康结果上,包括预期寿命缩短和获得牙科、精神和专科护理等基本服务的机会有限。现有的研究主要采用横向方法,未能捕捉到障碍是如何随着时间的推移而积累的。为了解决这一差距,本研究采用纵向视角来探讨比利时社会经济弱势群体中医疗保健准入障碍的累积性质。它还结合了患者和医疗保健提供者的观点。方法:采用半结构化访谈的定性纵向方法,在三个时间点对生活在社会经济环境中的16人进行了访谈。在同一时期,对保健提供者(HCPs),如全科医生(gp)、牙医、药剂师和心理学家进行了17次半结构化访谈。抽样策略包括目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的结合。访谈录音并记录下来,然后进行反思性专题分析,以确保进行透明和严格的分析。结果:研究表明,障碍获得护理积累随着时间的推移,特别是在一个分散的医疗保健系统的背景下。生活在社会经济弱势环境中的个人往往不重视他们的医疗保健,并且需要反复浏览获得医疗保健的连续体,以解决不同的健康问题,往往涉及多个医疗保健提供者。每次迭代都可能引入新的特定于提供商的障碍,使挑战复杂化,并增加获得医疗保健的复杂性。拥有非正式社会网络或卫生保健提供者和社会组织支持的参与者可以暂时克服获得护理的障碍。结论:该研究揭示了社会经济弱势群体获得医疗保健的复杂和累积障碍,包括竞争优先级,系统碎片化以及文化和语言挑战。虽然非正式的社交网络提供了一些支持,但它们不足以解决系统性问题。将这些网络与正式的社区外展举措结合起来,可以改善协调和获得医疗保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding challenges in healthcare access: qualitative insights from healthcare providers and people living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances.

Introduction: Equitable access to healthcare is fundamental to improving population health outcomes, yet persistent disparities leave many underserved, particularly those in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances. In Belgium, unmet healthcare needs are disproportionately concentrated among low-income groups, migrants and individuals with low educational attainment. These structural inequities are reflected in poorer health outcomes, including reduced life expectancy and limited access to essential services such as dental, mental, and specialist care. Existing research has primarily taken cross-sectional approaches, failing to capture how barriers accumulate over time. To address this gap, this study adopts a longitudinal perspective to explore the cumulative nature of healthcare access barriers among socio-economically vulnerable populations in Belgium. It also incorporates the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers.

Method: A qualitative longitudinal approach using semi-structured interviews at three time-points with 16 people living in socio-economically circumstances was conducted. In the same period, 17 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs), such as general practitioners (GPs), dentists, pharmacists and psychologists were carried out. The sampling strategy included a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, then reflexive thematic analysis was carried out to ensure a transparent and rigorous analysis.

Results: The study revealed that barriers to accessing care accumulate over time, particularly in the context of a fragmented healthcare system. Individuals living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances often deprioritise their healthcare and need to repeatedly navigate the healthcare access continuum to address different health concerns, often involving multiple healthcare providers. Each iteration can introduce new provider-specific barriers, compounding the challenges and increasing the complexity of accessing healthcare. Participants with an informal social network or support from HCPs and societal organisations could temporarily overcome the barriers to access care.

Conclusion: The study reveals the complex and cumulative barriers to healthcare access for socio-economically vulnerable individuals, including competing priorities, system fragmentation, and cultural and language challenges. While informal social networks provide some support, they are insufficient to address systemic issues. Integrating these networks with formal community outreach initiatives could improve coordination and access to healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信