SADS、SIDS和SUDEP之间的相似之处:同一金字塔的三面?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Rosario Barranco, Isabella Caristo, Andrea Molinelli, Gabriele Rocca, Nicolò Vernazza, Francesco Ventura
{"title":"SADS、SIDS和SUDEP之间的相似之处:同一金字塔的三面?","authors":"Rosario Barranco, Isabella Caristo, Andrea Molinelli, Gabriele Rocca, Nicolò Vernazza, Francesco Ventura","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03612-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS), Sudden Unexpected Death In Epilepsy (SUDEP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) present some overlaps and similarities in terms of molecular autopsy and pathophysiological mechanism. Genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias represent promising biomarkers, in light of the growing evidence of neurocardiac interconnections and phenotypic similarities between SUDEP, SADS and also SIDS. The interactions between these different forms of sudden death are reciprocal and could help to understand the mechanism of death that in some cases remains unexplained. In this review of the literature we analyse the overlaps and the common aspects between these different conditions of sudden death, we discuss the clinical, social and medico-legal implications. SIDS, SADS and SUDEP still represent a huge challenge for the Forensic Pathologist and their diagnostic interpretation contains some ambiguities and evaluation difficulties. All cases of sudden death require a thorough cardio-pathological and neuropathological evaluation. A thorough anamnesis and molecular analysis of the major channel protein genes (such as SCN5A, RYR2, KCHN2, and KCNQ1) should be performed in these cases, in addition to histological and toxicological analyses. Only a thorough and multidisciplinary evaluation can help to better define the cases of sudden death, avoid improper classifications and clarify the pathological mechanism more precisely.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update on the similarities between SADS, SIDS, and SUDEP: Three sides of the same pyramid?\",\"authors\":\"Rosario Barranco, Isabella Caristo, Andrea Molinelli, Gabriele Rocca, Nicolò Vernazza, Francesco Ventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00414-025-03612-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS), Sudden Unexpected Death In Epilepsy (SUDEP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) present some overlaps and similarities in terms of molecular autopsy and pathophysiological mechanism. Genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias represent promising biomarkers, in light of the growing evidence of neurocardiac interconnections and phenotypic similarities between SUDEP, SADS and also SIDS. The interactions between these different forms of sudden death are reciprocal and could help to understand the mechanism of death that in some cases remains unexplained. In this review of the literature we analyse the overlaps and the common aspects between these different conditions of sudden death, we discuss the clinical, social and medico-legal implications. SIDS, SADS and SUDEP still represent a huge challenge for the Forensic Pathologist and their diagnostic interpretation contains some ambiguities and evaluation difficulties. All cases of sudden death require a thorough cardio-pathological and neuropathological evaluation. A thorough anamnesis and molecular analysis of the major channel protein genes (such as SCN5A, RYR2, KCHN2, and KCNQ1) should be performed in these cases, in addition to histological and toxicological analyses. Only a thorough and multidisciplinary evaluation can help to better define the cases of sudden death, avoid improper classifications and clarify the pathological mechanism more precisely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03612-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03612-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猝死综合征(SADS)、癫痫猝死(SUDEP)和婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)在分子解剖和病理生理机制上存在一些重叠和相似之处。鉴于越来越多的证据表明,SUDEP、SADS和SIDS之间存在神经心脏相互联系和表型相似性,与心律失常相关的基因是有希望的生物标志物。这些不同形式的猝死之间的相互作用是相互的,可以帮助理解在某些情况下仍然无法解释的死亡机制。在这篇文献综述中,我们分析了这些不同情况下猝死的重叠和共同方面,我们讨论了临床、社会和医学法律意义。SIDS, SADS和SUDEP仍然是法医病理学家面临的巨大挑战,其诊断解释存在一些含糊不清和评估困难。所有猝死病例都需要进行彻底的心脏病理学和神经病理学评估。在这些病例中,除了进行组织学和毒理学分析外,还应对主要通道蛋白基因(如SCN5A、RYR2、KCHN2和KCNQ1)进行彻底的记忆和分子分析。只有进行全面的多学科评估,才能更好地界定猝死病例,避免分类不当,更准确地阐明病理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Update on the similarities between SADS, SIDS, and SUDEP: Three sides of the same pyramid?

Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS), Sudden Unexpected Death In Epilepsy (SUDEP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) present some overlaps and similarities in terms of molecular autopsy and pathophysiological mechanism. Genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias represent promising biomarkers, in light of the growing evidence of neurocardiac interconnections and phenotypic similarities between SUDEP, SADS and also SIDS. The interactions between these different forms of sudden death are reciprocal and could help to understand the mechanism of death that in some cases remains unexplained. In this review of the literature we analyse the overlaps and the common aspects between these different conditions of sudden death, we discuss the clinical, social and medico-legal implications. SIDS, SADS and SUDEP still represent a huge challenge for the Forensic Pathologist and their diagnostic interpretation contains some ambiguities and evaluation difficulties. All cases of sudden death require a thorough cardio-pathological and neuropathological evaluation. A thorough anamnesis and molecular analysis of the major channel protein genes (such as SCN5A, RYR2, KCHN2, and KCNQ1) should be performed in these cases, in addition to histological and toxicological analyses. Only a thorough and multidisciplinary evaluation can help to better define the cases of sudden death, avoid improper classifications and clarify the pathological mechanism more precisely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信