社区居住老年人抗胆碱能药物使用的患病率和相关因素:一项系统综述。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Keren Pelen, Willy-Brad Hagenimana, Marie-Laure Baroud, Yohann Moanahere Chiu, Hassiba Chebbihi, Karina Lebel, Patrick Boissy, Benoit Cossette
{"title":"社区居住老年人抗胆碱能药物使用的患病率和相关因素:一项系统综述。","authors":"Keren Pelen, Willy-Brad Hagenimana, Marie-Laure Baroud, Yohann Moanahere Chiu, Hassiba Chebbihi, Karina Lebel, Patrick Boissy, Benoit Cossette","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-02012-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medications with anticholinergic effects are widely used despite the mounting evidence of physical and cognitive impairment associated with their use among older adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to describe the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults, document the factors associated with their use and describe the most frequently used medication classes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2024. All study designs except case reports and case studies were eligible if they included community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and older and assessed the factors associated with anticholinergic medication use. An open-source artificial intelligence screening tool was used to optimise title and abstract screening. The subsequent review of the full texts of potentially eligible studies and data extraction were conducted in the Covidence systematic review tool using standardised data collection forms. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 4139 records of interest, the seven selected studies included five cross-sectional and two retrospective studies, published between 2014 and 2021. The risk of bias was assessed to be low in five studies and high in two studies. Greater anticholinergic burden was associated with female sex, lower socioeconomic status, higher co-morbidity score, higher frailty probability, specific diseases, polypharmacy and greater use of healthcare, while increasing age was associated with both increased and decreased anticholinergic burden. Anticholinergic exposure, varied from a low of 6.2% of medical visits in the United States between 2006 and 2015, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, to a high of 72.8% of medication claims (dispensed medications) in South Korea, over the year 2012, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Burden Scale. The use of six different anticholinergic scales and different evaluation periods did not allow a meaningful comparison of the prevalence of anticholinergic exposure across studies. Antidepressants, antihistamines and antimuscarinics were the most common medication classes in the two studies using this classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review documented key socioeconomic and health status factors to be targeted by interventions aimed at limiting the use of anticholinergic medications in community-dwelling older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and factors associated with anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Keren Pelen, Willy-Brad Hagenimana, Marie-Laure Baroud, Yohann Moanahere Chiu, Hassiba Chebbihi, Karina Lebel, Patrick Boissy, Benoit Cossette\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-02012-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medications with anticholinergic effects are widely used despite the mounting evidence of physical and cognitive impairment associated with their use among older adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to describe the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults, document the factors associated with their use and describe the most frequently used medication classes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2024. All study designs except case reports and case studies were eligible if they included community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and older and assessed the factors associated with anticholinergic medication use. An open-source artificial intelligence screening tool was used to optimise title and abstract screening. The subsequent review of the full texts of potentially eligible studies and data extraction were conducted in the Covidence systematic review tool using standardised data collection forms. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 4139 records of interest, the seven selected studies included five cross-sectional and two retrospective studies, published between 2014 and 2021. The risk of bias was assessed to be low in five studies and high in two studies. Greater anticholinergic burden was associated with female sex, lower socioeconomic status, higher co-morbidity score, higher frailty probability, specific diseases, polypharmacy and greater use of healthcare, while increasing age was associated with both increased and decreased anticholinergic burden. Anticholinergic exposure, varied from a low of 6.2% of medical visits in the United States between 2006 and 2015, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, to a high of 72.8% of medication claims (dispensed medications) in South Korea, over the year 2012, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Burden Scale. The use of six different anticholinergic scales and different evaluation periods did not allow a meaningful comparison of the prevalence of anticholinergic exposure across studies. Antidepressants, antihistamines and antimuscarinics were the most common medication classes in the two studies using this classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review documented key socioeconomic and health status factors to be targeted by interventions aimed at limiting the use of anticholinergic medications in community-dwelling older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02012-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02012-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有抗胆碱能作用的药物被广泛使用,尽管越来越多的证据表明在老年人中使用这些药物会导致身体和认知损伤。目的:本研究对社区老年人抗胆碱能药物的使用情况进行了系统回顾,记录了与使用相关的因素,并描述了最常用的药物类别。方法:检索自建校至2024年5月的MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL数据库。除病例报告和案例研究外,如果纳入社区居住的65岁及以上老年人,并评估与抗胆碱能药物使用相关的因素,则所有研究设计均符合条件。采用开源人工智能筛选工具对标题和摘要筛选进行优化。随后,使用标准化数据收集表格,在冠状病毒系统审查工具中对可能符合条件的研究全文进行了审查并提取了数据。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人独立进行。结果:从4139份相关记录中,7项选定的研究包括2014年至2021年间发表的5项横断面研究和2项回顾性研究。5项研究评估偏倚风险为低,2项研究评估偏倚风险为高。较大的抗胆碱能负担与女性、较低的社会经济地位、较高的合病评分、较高的衰弱概率、特殊疾病、多种药物和更多的医疗保健使用有关,而年龄的增加与抗胆碱能负担的增加和减少有关。根据2015年比尔斯标准和抗胆碱能风险量表评估,2006年至2015年期间,美国的抗胆碱能暴露率低至6.2%,而2012年韩国的抗胆碱能暴露率高至72.8%,根据2015年比尔斯标准和抗胆碱能负担量表评估。使用六种不同的抗胆碱能量表和不同的评估期不能对研究中抗胆碱能暴露的流行程度进行有意义的比较。在使用这种分类的两项研究中,抗抑郁药、抗组胺药和抗毒蕈素是最常见的药物类别。结论:本系统综述记录了关键的社会经济和健康状况因素,旨在限制社区居住老年人使用抗胆碱能药物的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and factors associated with anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.

Introduction: Medications with anticholinergic effects are widely used despite the mounting evidence of physical and cognitive impairment associated with their use among older adults.

Aim: A systematic review was conducted to describe the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults, document the factors associated with their use and describe the most frequently used medication classes.

Method: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2024. All study designs except case reports and case studies were eligible if they included community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and older and assessed the factors associated with anticholinergic medication use. An open-source artificial intelligence screening tool was used to optimise title and abstract screening. The subsequent review of the full texts of potentially eligible studies and data extraction were conducted in the Covidence systematic review tool using standardised data collection forms. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.

Results: From 4139 records of interest, the seven selected studies included five cross-sectional and two retrospective studies, published between 2014 and 2021. The risk of bias was assessed to be low in five studies and high in two studies. Greater anticholinergic burden was associated with female sex, lower socioeconomic status, higher co-morbidity score, higher frailty probability, specific diseases, polypharmacy and greater use of healthcare, while increasing age was associated with both increased and decreased anticholinergic burden. Anticholinergic exposure, varied from a low of 6.2% of medical visits in the United States between 2006 and 2015, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, to a high of 72.8% of medication claims (dispensed medications) in South Korea, over the year 2012, assessed with the 2015 Beers Criteria and the Anticholinergic Burden Scale. The use of six different anticholinergic scales and different evaluation periods did not allow a meaningful comparison of the prevalence of anticholinergic exposure across studies. Antidepressants, antihistamines and antimuscarinics were the most common medication classes in the two studies using this classification.

Conclusion: This systematic review documented key socioeconomic and health status factors to be targeted by interventions aimed at limiting the use of anticholinergic medications in community-dwelling older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信