非标准就业、带薪病假和COVID-19自我隔离期间的收入损失:来自韩国的横断面调查结果

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sunoong Hwang
{"title":"非标准就业、带薪病假和COVID-19自我隔离期间的收入损失:来自韩国的横断面调查结果","authors":"Sunoong Hwang","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02636-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing and isolation are crucial measures to control infectious diseases, yet limited research has examined inequalities in the impact of these measures on individual earnings. This study aimed to assess whether income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation varied by workers' employment type in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data were collected via online surveys from March to September 2022. The analysis included 1,064 employees who tested positive for COVID-19, aged 20-65. Employment types were categorized as standard or non-standard, with the latter encompassing temporary, part-time, and atypical arrangements (multi-party employment arrangements or dependent self-employment). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between employment type and income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation. The mediating roles of access to paid sick leave and the level of compensation provided were assessed through a counterfactual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30.5% of participants experienced decreased earnings while self-isolating due to COVID-19 infection. After adjusting for covariates, non-standard workers were three times more likely (adjusted odds ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 2.10-4.15]) to experience this income loss compared to standard employees. Among non-standard worker subgroups, atypical workers faced the highest risk (4.06 [2.52-6.55]), followed by part-time (3.02 [1.78-5.13]) and temporary workers (2.25 [1.44-3.51]). This disparity in income loss was attributed to two distinct pathways: non-standard workers having less access to paid sick leave (coverage gap) and, when such leave was available, being more likely than standard workers to receive compensation that was insufficient to maintain pre-isolation earnings (adequacy gap). Our mediation analysis indicated that these two pathways contributed almost equally (51% and 49%, respectively) to the observed income disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both expanding access to paid sick leave and ensuring adequate compensation rates are needed to enable non-standard workers to comply with pandemic control measures without fear of income loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-standard employment, paid sick leave, and income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation: cross-sectional findings from South Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Sunoong Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02636-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing and isolation are crucial measures to control infectious diseases, yet limited research has examined inequalities in the impact of these measures on individual earnings. This study aimed to assess whether income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation varied by workers' employment type in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data were collected via online surveys from March to September 2022. The analysis included 1,064 employees who tested positive for COVID-19, aged 20-65. Employment types were categorized as standard or non-standard, with the latter encompassing temporary, part-time, and atypical arrangements (multi-party employment arrangements or dependent self-employment). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between employment type and income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation. The mediating roles of access to paid sick leave and the level of compensation provided were assessed through a counterfactual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30.5% of participants experienced decreased earnings while self-isolating due to COVID-19 infection. After adjusting for covariates, non-standard workers were three times more likely (adjusted odds ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 2.10-4.15]) to experience this income loss compared to standard employees. Among non-standard worker subgroups, atypical workers faced the highest risk (4.06 [2.52-6.55]), followed by part-time (3.02 [1.78-5.13]) and temporary workers (2.25 [1.44-3.51]). This disparity in income loss was attributed to two distinct pathways: non-standard workers having less access to paid sick leave (coverage gap) and, when such leave was available, being more likely than standard workers to receive compensation that was insufficient to maintain pre-isolation earnings (adequacy gap). Our mediation analysis indicated that these two pathways contributed almost equally (51% and 49%, respectively) to the observed income disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both expanding access to paid sick leave and ensuring adequate compensation rates are needed to enable non-standard workers to comply with pandemic control measures without fear of income loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02636-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02636-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:检测和隔离是控制传染病的关键措施,但有限的研究审查了这些措施对个人收入影响的不平等。该研究旨在评估在韩国,新冠肺炎自我隔离期间的收入损失是否因工人的就业类型而异。方法:于2022年3月至9月通过在线调查收集横断面数据。该分析包括1064名COVID-19检测呈阳性的员工,年龄在20-65岁之间。就业类型分为标准或非标准,后者包括临时、兼职和非典型安排(多方就业安排或依赖自营职业)。采用多因素logistic回归检验COVID-19自我隔离期间就业类型与收入损失之间的关系。通过反事实框架评估了获得带薪病假和提供补偿水平的中介作用。结果:总体而言,30.5%的参与者在因COVID-19感染而自我隔离时收入下降。在调整协变量后,与标准员工相比,非标准员工经历这种收入损失的可能性(调整优势比2.96[95%置信区间2.10-4.15])高出三倍。在非标准工人亚组中,非标准工人面临的风险最高(4.06[2.52-6.55]),其次是兼职工人(3.02[1.78-5.13])和临时工(2.25[1.44-3.51])。收入损失方面的这种差异可归因于两种不同的途径:非标准工人获得带薪病假的机会较少(覆盖差距),如果有带薪病假,则比标准工人更有可能获得不足以维持隔离前收入的补偿(充足差距)。我们的中介分析表明,这两种途径对观察到的收入差距的贡献几乎相等(分别为51%和49%)。结论:扩大带薪病假和确保适当的赔偿率都是必要的,以使非标准工人能够遵守大流行控制措施,而不必担心收入损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-standard employment, paid sick leave, and income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation: cross-sectional findings from South Korea.

Background: Testing and isolation are crucial measures to control infectious diseases, yet limited research has examined inequalities in the impact of these measures on individual earnings. This study aimed to assess whether income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation varied by workers' employment type in South Korea.

Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected via online surveys from March to September 2022. The analysis included 1,064 employees who tested positive for COVID-19, aged 20-65. Employment types were categorized as standard or non-standard, with the latter encompassing temporary, part-time, and atypical arrangements (multi-party employment arrangements or dependent self-employment). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between employment type and income loss during COVID-19 self-isolation. The mediating roles of access to paid sick leave and the level of compensation provided were assessed through a counterfactual framework.

Results: Overall, 30.5% of participants experienced decreased earnings while self-isolating due to COVID-19 infection. After adjusting for covariates, non-standard workers were three times more likely (adjusted odds ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 2.10-4.15]) to experience this income loss compared to standard employees. Among non-standard worker subgroups, atypical workers faced the highest risk (4.06 [2.52-6.55]), followed by part-time (3.02 [1.78-5.13]) and temporary workers (2.25 [1.44-3.51]). This disparity in income loss was attributed to two distinct pathways: non-standard workers having less access to paid sick leave (coverage gap) and, when such leave was available, being more likely than standard workers to receive compensation that was insufficient to maintain pre-isolation earnings (adequacy gap). Our mediation analysis indicated that these two pathways contributed almost equally (51% and 49%, respectively) to the observed income disparities.

Conclusion: Both expanding access to paid sick leave and ensuring adequate compensation rates are needed to enable non-standard workers to comply with pandemic control measures without fear of income loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信