Gabriel Souza Mares, Raquel Pinto Coelho Souza Dias, Felipe Costa Neiva, Cidia Vasconcellos
{"title":"内窥镜下与镜下鼓膜成形术的比较分析。","authors":"Gabriel Souza Mares, Raquel Pinto Coelho Souza Dias, Felipe Costa Neiva, Cidia Vasconcellos","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myringoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at reconstructing the tympanic membrane, restoring acoustic protection to the round window, and improving sound conduction to enhance hearing, and prevent recurrent infections or otorrhea. This procedure can be performed either through microscopy or endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of endoscopic myringoplasty and microscopic myringoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records of patients who underwent myringoplasty either through microscopy or videoendoscopy at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE) between December 2015 and December 2020. We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, defined as tympanic membrane closure, the variation in the pre- and postoperative speech recognition threshold (SRT), and the incidence of immediate and late complications in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 118 patients: 64 underwent microscopic myringoplasty (group 1) and 54, videoendoscopic myringoplasty (group 2). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The surgical success rates were similar between the 2 groups: group 1: 70.3%; and group 2: 75.9% ( <i>p</i> = 0.494). Group 1 presented a significant improvement in the mean postoperative hearing thresholds (30.0 ± 14.9) compared to the mean preoperative levels (41.0 ± 16.3) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), while group 2 did not present a statistically significant improvement (from 37.8 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 32.0 ± 20.7 postoperatively; <i>p</i> = 0.284).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscopic and endoscopic myringoplasty yielded similar tympanic membrane closure rates. However, the videoendoscopic procedures resulted in lower SRT reduction, while the microscopic procedures resulted in a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 3","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic and Microscopic Myringoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Souza Mares, Raquel Pinto Coelho Souza Dias, Felipe Costa Neiva, Cidia Vasconcellos\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1809929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myringoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at reconstructing the tympanic membrane, restoring acoustic protection to the round window, and improving sound conduction to enhance hearing, and prevent recurrent infections or otorrhea. This procedure can be performed either through microscopy or endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of endoscopic myringoplasty and microscopic myringoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records of patients who underwent myringoplasty either through microscopy or videoendoscopy at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE) between December 2015 and December 2020. We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, defined as tympanic membrane closure, the variation in the pre- and postoperative speech recognition threshold (SRT), and the incidence of immediate and late complications in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 118 patients: 64 underwent microscopic myringoplasty (group 1) and 54, videoendoscopic myringoplasty (group 2). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The surgical success rates were similar between the 2 groups: group 1: 70.3%; and group 2: 75.9% ( <i>p</i> = 0.494). Group 1 presented a significant improvement in the mean postoperative hearing thresholds (30.0 ± 14.9) compared to the mean preoperative levels (41.0 ± 16.3) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), while group 2 did not present a statistically significant improvement (from 37.8 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 32.0 ± 20.7 postoperatively; <i>p</i> = 0.284).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscopic and endoscopic myringoplasty yielded similar tympanic membrane closure rates. However, the videoendoscopic procedures resulted in lower SRT reduction, while the microscopic procedures resulted in a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
耳膜成形术是一种旨在重建鼓膜,恢复圆形窗口的声学保护,改善声音传导以增强听力,防止复发性感染或耳漏的外科手术。这个过程可以通过显微镜或内窥镜进行。目的:比较内镜下鼓膜成形术与显微镜下鼓膜成形术的效果。方法:回顾性收集2015年12月至2020年12月期间在巴西Servidor医院Público Estadual de s o Paulo (HSPE)通过显微镜或视频内窥镜进行鼓膜成形术的患者的电子病历数据。我们评估了每组的治疗成功率,定义为鼓膜闭合,术前和术后语音识别阈值(SRT)的变化,以及即时和晚期并发症的发生率。结果:我们纳入118例患者,其中64例行镜下鼓膜成形术(1组),54例行内镜下鼓膜成形术(2组)。两组在平均年龄、性别和身体质量指数(BMI)方面具有可比性。两组手术成功率相似:1组:70.3%;第2组:75.9% (p = 0.494)。组1术后平均听力阈值(30.0±14.9)较术前平均水平(41.0±16.3)有显著改善(p p = 0.284)。结论:镜下鼓膜成形术与内镜下鼓膜成形术的鼓膜闭合率相似。然而,视频内窥镜手术导致较低的SRT降低,而显微镜手术导致较高的即时术后并发症发生率。证据等级:3。
Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic and Microscopic Myringoplasty.
Introduction: Myringoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at reconstructing the tympanic membrane, restoring acoustic protection to the round window, and improving sound conduction to enhance hearing, and prevent recurrent infections or otorrhea. This procedure can be performed either through microscopy or endoscopy.
Objective: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic myringoplasty and microscopic myringoplasty.
Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records of patients who underwent myringoplasty either through microscopy or videoendoscopy at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE) between December 2015 and December 2020. We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, defined as tympanic membrane closure, the variation in the pre- and postoperative speech recognition threshold (SRT), and the incidence of immediate and late complications in each group.
Results: We included 118 patients: 64 underwent microscopic myringoplasty (group 1) and 54, videoendoscopic myringoplasty (group 2). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The surgical success rates were similar between the 2 groups: group 1: 70.3%; and group 2: 75.9% ( p = 0.494). Group 1 presented a significant improvement in the mean postoperative hearing thresholds (30.0 ± 14.9) compared to the mean preoperative levels (41.0 ± 16.3) ( p < 0.001), while group 2 did not present a statistically significant improvement (from 37.8 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 32.0 ± 20.7 postoperatively; p = 0.284).
Conclusion: Microscopic and endoscopic myringoplasty yielded similar tympanic membrane closure rates. However, the videoendoscopic procedures resulted in lower SRT reduction, while the microscopic procedures resulted in a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications.