{"title":"心力衰竭患者使用血管紧张素受体Neprilysin抑制剂、可溶性鸟苷酸环化酶刺激剂和心肌球蛋白激活剂的疗效、安全性和生活质量是否受性别影响?系统评价。","authors":"Amanda Veiga Barbosa, Lucas Caetano Araújo Silva, Inajara Rotta, Patricia Melo Aguiar","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a condition with significant differences between men and women, due to pathophysiology disparities attributed to hormonal factors and different comorbidities rates. There are no guidelines specifically tailored for women. The objective of the study is to summarise the current evidence of efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life associated with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, guanylate cyclase stimulators, and cardiac myosin activators drugs across different sexes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction or HF with preserved ejection fraction. The outcomes were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, functional capacity, ventricular remodelling, safety results, and quality of life. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included data from eight RCTs (10 studies), involving a total of 15,021 patients, of whom 48% were women. HF with preserved ejection fraction was studied in five RCTs, and HF with reduced ejection fraction in three RCTs. Regarding clinical outcomes, six RCTs evaluated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, all comparing sacubitril-valsartan with standard therapy, while two others compared functional capacity between the sexes, two analysed safety outcomes by sex subgroups, and only one RCT compared men and women for the ventricular remodelling outcome. Two RCTs assessed differences in quality of life between men and women. None of the studies showed any statistical difference between the subgroups and most outcomes demonstrated a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review shows consistent efficacy, safety and quality of life across both sexes for HF treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Sex Affect the Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients Using Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulators, and Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Veiga Barbosa, Lucas Caetano Araújo Silva, Inajara Rotta, Patricia Melo Aguiar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a condition with significant differences between men and women, due to pathophysiology disparities attributed to hormonal factors and different comorbidities rates. There are no guidelines specifically tailored for women. The objective of the study is to summarise the current evidence of efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life associated with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, guanylate cyclase stimulators, and cardiac myosin activators drugs across different sexes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction or HF with preserved ejection fraction. The outcomes were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, functional capacity, ventricular remodelling, safety results, and quality of life. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included data from eight RCTs (10 studies), involving a total of 15,021 patients, of whom 48% were women. HF with preserved ejection fraction was studied in five RCTs, and HF with reduced ejection fraction in three RCTs. Regarding clinical outcomes, six RCTs evaluated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, all comparing sacubitril-valsartan with standard therapy, while two others compared functional capacity between the sexes, two analysed safety outcomes by sex subgroups, and only one RCT compared men and women for the ventricular remodelling outcome. Two RCTs assessed differences in quality of life between men and women. None of the studies showed any statistical difference between the subgroups and most outcomes demonstrated a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review shows consistent efficacy, safety and quality of life across both sexes for HF treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于激素因素导致的病理生理差异和合并症发生率不同,心力衰竭(HF)在男性和女性之间存在显著差异。没有专门为女性量身定制的指南。本研究的目的是总结不同性别的血管紧张素受体neprilysin抑制剂、鸟苷酸环化酶刺激剂和心肌球蛋白激活剂药物的有效性、安全性和对生活质量的影响。方法:我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Central和谷歌Scholar数据库中进行了系统搜索,以获取随机对照试验(rct),包括射血分数降低的HF患者或保留射血分数的HF患者。结果是n端前b型利钠肽激素水平、功能容量、心室重构、安全性结果和生活质量。使用risk of bias 2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:本综述纳入了8项随机对照试验(10项研究)的数据,共涉及15021例患者,其中48%为女性。5项随机对照试验研究了保留射血分数的HF, 3项随机对照试验研究了降低射血分数的HF。关于临床结果,六项随机对照试验评估了n端前b型利钠肽激素水平,所有试验都比较了苏比替-缬沙坦与标准治疗,另外两项比较了两性之间的功能容量,两项分析了性别亚组的安全性结果,只有一项随机对照试验比较了男性和女性的心室重构结果。两项随机对照试验评估了男性和女性生活质量的差异。没有一项研究显示亚组之间有统计学差异,大多数结果显示偏倚风险较低。结论:本综述显示HF治疗的有效性、安全性和生活质量在两性中是一致的。
Does Sex Affect the Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients Using Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulators, and Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure? A Systematic Review.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a condition with significant differences between men and women, due to pathophysiology disparities attributed to hormonal factors and different comorbidities rates. There are no guidelines specifically tailored for women. The objective of the study is to summarise the current evidence of efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life associated with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, guanylate cyclase stimulators, and cardiac myosin activators drugs across different sexes.
Methods: We performed a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction or HF with preserved ejection fraction. The outcomes were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, functional capacity, ventricular remodelling, safety results, and quality of life. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.
Results: This review included data from eight RCTs (10 studies), involving a total of 15,021 patients, of whom 48% were women. HF with preserved ejection fraction was studied in five RCTs, and HF with reduced ejection fraction in three RCTs. Regarding clinical outcomes, six RCTs evaluated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide hormone levels, all comparing sacubitril-valsartan with standard therapy, while two others compared functional capacity between the sexes, two analysed safety outcomes by sex subgroups, and only one RCT compared men and women for the ventricular remodelling outcome. Two RCTs assessed differences in quality of life between men and women. None of the studies showed any statistical difference between the subgroups and most outcomes demonstrated a low risk of bias.
Conclusions: This review shows consistent efficacy, safety and quality of life across both sexes for HF treatments.
期刊介绍:
Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.