利用基因组选择提高玉米对枯萎病茎秆腐病抗性的潜力评估。

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Plant Science Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpls.2025.1631408
Hirenallur Chandappa Lohithaswa, B M Showkath Babu, Muntagodu Shreekanth Sowmya, Santhosh Kumari Banakar, Nanjundappa Mallikarjuna, Ganiga Jadesha, Mallana Gowdra Mallikarjuna, D C Balasundara, Pandravada Anand
{"title":"利用基因组选择提高玉米对枯萎病茎秆腐病抗性的潜力评估。","authors":"Hirenallur Chandappa Lohithaswa, B M Showkath Babu, Muntagodu Shreekanth Sowmya, Santhosh Kumari Banakar, Nanjundappa Mallikarjuna, Ganiga Jadesha, Mallana Gowdra Mallikarjuna, D C Balasundara, Pandravada Anand","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2025.1631408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fusarium stalk rot (FSR), caused by <i>Fusarium verticilliodes</i>, is a serious disease in maize. Resistance to FSR is complexly inherited. Thus, an investigation was carried out to predict and validate the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for FSR resistance. Three doubled haploid (DH) populations induced from F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> of the cross VL1043 × CM212 and F<sub>2</sub> of the cross VL121096 × CM202 were used in the current study. Six different parametric models (Genomic-Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (GBLUP), BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (BLASSO), and Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR)) were employed to estimate the prediction accuracy. Further, the accuracy of predicted genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for FSR resistance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and independent validation. The training population (TP) size and marker density were optimized by considering different proportions of training set (TS) and validation set (VS) and varying marker density from 40 to 100%. The estimates of descriptive statistics and genetic variability parameters, which include mean, standardized range, genetic variance, phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations, broad sense heritability, and genetic advance as per cent mean (GAM), were relatively higher in DH F<sub>2</sub>s than those in DH F<sub>1</sub>s. Prediction accuracies displayed an increasing trend with an increase in the proportion of training set size and marker density in all three DH populations. The TS:VS proportion of 75:25 in DH F<sub>1</sub> (VL1043 × CM212) and DH F<sub>2</sub> (VL121096 × CM202), and 80:20 in DH F<sub>2</sub> of VL1043 × CM212 resulted in greater prediction accuracy than other TS:VS proportions. Study of linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay pattern across all the populations indicated that the number of markers employed were sufficient to conduct a genomic prediction (GP) study in two DH F<sub>2</sub> populations of crosses VL1043 × CM212 and VL121096 × CM202. Prediction accuracies of 0.24 and 0.17 were recorded for FSR resistance in independent validation when DH F<sub>2</sub> of cross VL121096 × CM202 was used for validation and DH F<sub>1</sub> and DH F<sub>2</sub>s from the cross VL1043 × CM212 as training sets. A significant positive correlation of FSR resistance between the DHs selected based on their GEBVs and those selected based on test cross performance indicated the efficiency of genomic prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12632,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Plant Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"1631408"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the potential for genomic selection to improve resistance to fusarium stalk rot in maize.\",\"authors\":\"Hirenallur Chandappa Lohithaswa, B M Showkath Babu, Muntagodu Shreekanth Sowmya, Santhosh Kumari Banakar, Nanjundappa Mallikarjuna, Ganiga Jadesha, Mallana Gowdra Mallikarjuna, D C Balasundara, Pandravada Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpls.2025.1631408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fusarium stalk rot (FSR), caused by <i>Fusarium verticilliodes</i>, is a serious disease in maize. Resistance to FSR is complexly inherited. Thus, an investigation was carried out to predict and validate the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for FSR resistance. Three doubled haploid (DH) populations induced from F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> of the cross VL1043 × CM212 and F<sub>2</sub> of the cross VL121096 × CM202 were used in the current study. Six different parametric models (Genomic-Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (GBLUP), BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (BLASSO), and Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR)) were employed to estimate the prediction accuracy. Further, the accuracy of predicted genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for FSR resistance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and independent validation. The training population (TP) size and marker density were optimized by considering different proportions of training set (TS) and validation set (VS) and varying marker density from 40 to 100%. The estimates of descriptive statistics and genetic variability parameters, which include mean, standardized range, genetic variance, phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations, broad sense heritability, and genetic advance as per cent mean (GAM), were relatively higher in DH F<sub>2</sub>s than those in DH F<sub>1</sub>s. Prediction accuracies displayed an increasing trend with an increase in the proportion of training set size and marker density in all three DH populations. The TS:VS proportion of 75:25 in DH F<sub>1</sub> (VL1043 × CM212) and DH F<sub>2</sub> (VL121096 × CM202), and 80:20 in DH F<sub>2</sub> of VL1043 × CM212 resulted in greater prediction accuracy than other TS:VS proportions. Study of linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay pattern across all the populations indicated that the number of markers employed were sufficient to conduct a genomic prediction (GP) study in two DH F<sub>2</sub> populations of crosses VL1043 × CM212 and VL121096 × CM202. Prediction accuracies of 0.24 and 0.17 were recorded for FSR resistance in independent validation when DH F<sub>2</sub> of cross VL121096 × CM202 was used for validation and DH F<sub>1</sub> and DH F<sub>2</sub>s from the cross VL1043 × CM212 as training sets. A significant positive correlation of FSR resistance between the DHs selected based on their GEBVs and those selected based on test cross performance indicated the efficiency of genomic prediction models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Plant Science\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1631408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Plant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1631408\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1631408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玉米枯萎病(Fusarium stalk rot, FSR)是由玉米枯萎病引起的一种严重病害。对FSR的抵抗是复杂的遗传。因此,进行了一项调查,以预测和验证FSR抗性的基因组估计育种值(GEBVs)。本研究利用杂交VL1043 × CM212的F1和F2和杂交VL121096 × CM202的F2诱导的3个双单倍体(DH)群体。采用6种不同的参数模型(基因组-最佳线性无偏预测器(GBLUP)、BayesA、BayesB、BayesC、贝叶斯最小绝对收缩和选择算子(BLASSO)和贝叶斯脊回归(BRR))来估计预测精度。此外,通过5倍交叉验证和独立验证,评估了预测FSR抗性的基因组估计育种值(GEBV)的准确性。通过考虑训练集(TS)和验证集(VS)的不同比例以及标记密度从40%到100%的变化,对训练总体(TP)大小和标记密度进行优化。描述性统计和遗传变异参数的估计值,包括平均值、标准化范围、遗传方差、变异的表型和基因型系数、广义遗传力和遗传进步平均百分比(GAM),在DH F2s中相对高于DH F1s。随着训练集大小和标记密度的增加,三个DH群体的预测精度均呈上升趋势。VL1043 × CM212和VL121096 × CM202的TS:VS比例为75:25,VL1043 × CM212的DH: F2的TS:VS比例为80:20,预测精度高于其他TS:VS比例。对所有群体的连锁不平衡(LD)衰减模式的研究表明,所使用的标记数量足以对杂交VL1043 × CM212和VL121096 × CM202两个DH F2群体进行基因组预测(GP)研究。以杂交VL121096 × CM202的DH F2进行验证,杂交VL1043 × CM212的DH F1和DH F2s作为训练集进行独立验证,FSR抗性预测准确率分别为0.24和0.17。基于gebv选择的水稻抗性与基于试验杂交性能选择的水稻抗性呈显著正相关,表明基因组预测模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the potential for genomic selection to improve resistance to fusarium stalk rot in maize.

Fusarium stalk rot (FSR), caused by Fusarium verticilliodes, is a serious disease in maize. Resistance to FSR is complexly inherited. Thus, an investigation was carried out to predict and validate the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for FSR resistance. Three doubled haploid (DH) populations induced from F1 and F2 of the cross VL1043 × CM212 and F2 of the cross VL121096 × CM202 were used in the current study. Six different parametric models (Genomic-Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (GBLUP), BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (BLASSO), and Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR)) were employed to estimate the prediction accuracy. Further, the accuracy of predicted genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for FSR resistance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and independent validation. The training population (TP) size and marker density were optimized by considering different proportions of training set (TS) and validation set (VS) and varying marker density from 40 to 100%. The estimates of descriptive statistics and genetic variability parameters, which include mean, standardized range, genetic variance, phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations, broad sense heritability, and genetic advance as per cent mean (GAM), were relatively higher in DH F2s than those in DH F1s. Prediction accuracies displayed an increasing trend with an increase in the proportion of training set size and marker density in all three DH populations. The TS:VS proportion of 75:25 in DH F1 (VL1043 × CM212) and DH F2 (VL121096 × CM202), and 80:20 in DH F2 of VL1043 × CM212 resulted in greater prediction accuracy than other TS:VS proportions. Study of linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay pattern across all the populations indicated that the number of markers employed were sufficient to conduct a genomic prediction (GP) study in two DH F2 populations of crosses VL1043 × CM212 and VL121096 × CM202. Prediction accuracies of 0.24 and 0.17 were recorded for FSR resistance in independent validation when DH F2 of cross VL121096 × CM202 was used for validation and DH F1 and DH F2s from the cross VL1043 × CM212 as training sets. A significant positive correlation of FSR resistance between the DHs selected based on their GEBVs and those selected based on test cross performance indicated the efficiency of genomic prediction models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Plant Science
Frontiers in Plant Science PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
4844
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: In an ever changing world, plant science is of the utmost importance for securing the future well-being of humankind. Plants provide oxygen, food, feed, fibers, and building materials. In addition, they are a diverse source of industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals. Plants are centrally important to the health of ecosystems, and their understanding is critical for learning how to manage and maintain a sustainable biosphere. Plant science is extremely interdisciplinary, reaching from agricultural science to paleobotany, and molecular physiology to ecology. It uses the latest developments in computer science, optics, molecular biology and genomics to address challenges in model systems, agricultural crops, and ecosystems. Plant science research inquires into the form, function, development, diversity, reproduction, evolution and uses of both higher and lower plants and their interactions with other organisms throughout the biosphere. Frontiers in Plant Science welcomes outstanding contributions in any field of plant science from basic to applied research, from organismal to molecular studies, from single plant analysis to studies of populations and whole ecosystems, and from molecular to biophysical to computational approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Plant Science. The mission of Frontiers in Plant Science is to bring all relevant Plant Science areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信