澳大利亚妇女中年期间植物性食物消费的比例和晚年认知健康:来自妇女健康老龄化项目(WHAP)的数据。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Phuong Le, Cassandra Szoeke, Kaitlin Day, Russell Conduit, Sharayah Carter, Catherine Itsiopoulos
{"title":"澳大利亚妇女中年期间植物性食物消费的比例和晚年认知健康:来自妇女健康老龄化项目(WHAP)的数据。","authors":"Phuong Le, Cassandra Szoeke, Kaitlin Day, Russell Conduit, Sharayah Carter, Catherine Itsiopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s00394-025-03786-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Plant-based food (PBF) is well-known for its benefits for physical health; however, its impacts on brain health are less well understood, especially in ageing women. This study aimed to examine the association between different proportions of midlife daily PBF intake and late-life cognitive health among ageing Australian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data of 186 women who had dietary assessment at baseline (1998, aged 52-63) and cognitive assessments at follow-up (2012, aged 66-77) from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project (WHAP). The cohort was divided into quartiles according to the proportions of PBF in their daily diet at baseline. Late-life cognitive function was assessed by Global cognitive composite score (GCCS)-a summary of z-scores of 13 cognitive tests of the Cogstate battery. Three regression models were conducted: unadjusted (N = 186), partially adjusted (age, education, energy intake; N = 186), and fully adjusted (age, education, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, smoking, APOE 4 allele status, N = 165).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted and partially adjusted models (N = 186), women in the third quartile (Q3) (second highest consumption of PBF during midlife) had significantly higher GCCS in later life compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (B = 0.39, 95% CI [0.13; 0.66]; p = 0.004 for the unadjusted model; B = 0.34; 95% CI [0.08; 0.61]; p = 0.012, for the partially adjusted model). However, this association was no longer significant in the fully adjusted model (N = 165) (B = 0.25; 95% CI [- 0.02; 0.51]; p = 0.07), where APOE 4 allele status emerged as a significant predictor (B = - 0.25, 95% CI [ - 0.45; - 0.04]; p = 0.02). This change may reflect the reduced statistical power due to smaller sample size and the confounding effect of the genetic risk factors. Among APOE 4 carriers, higher PBF quartiles (Q2-Q4) each predicted greater GCCS in unadjusted analyses; in the adjusted model, Q3 versus Q1 remained significant, but the overall model did not reach significance. Investigation into the change in PBF consumption from midlife to late-life revealed no association with late-life cognitive health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midlife PBF consumption did not show a significant independent association with late-life cognitive health after fully adjustment for confounders in this cohort of older Australian women. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution as the small sample size and confounding factors might have affected the ability to detect a subtle effect of PBF on cognition. Future research is needed to explore this relationship in larger, more diverse samples and its complex interaction with genetic risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 7","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The proportion of plant-based food consumption during midlife and cognitive health in later life in Australian women: data from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project (WHAP).\",\"authors\":\"Phuong Le, Cassandra Szoeke, Kaitlin Day, Russell Conduit, Sharayah Carter, Catherine Itsiopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00394-025-03786-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Plant-based food (PBF) is well-known for its benefits for physical health; however, its impacts on brain health are less well understood, especially in ageing women. This study aimed to examine the association between different proportions of midlife daily PBF intake and late-life cognitive health among ageing Australian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data of 186 women who had dietary assessment at baseline (1998, aged 52-63) and cognitive assessments at follow-up (2012, aged 66-77) from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project (WHAP). The cohort was divided into quartiles according to the proportions of PBF in their daily diet at baseline. Late-life cognitive function was assessed by Global cognitive composite score (GCCS)-a summary of z-scores of 13 cognitive tests of the Cogstate battery. Three regression models were conducted: unadjusted (N = 186), partially adjusted (age, education, energy intake; N = 186), and fully adjusted (age, education, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, smoking, APOE 4 allele status, N = 165).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted and partially adjusted models (N = 186), women in the third quartile (Q3) (second highest consumption of PBF during midlife) had significantly higher GCCS in later life compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (B = 0.39, 95% CI [0.13; 0.66]; p = 0.004 for the unadjusted model; B = 0.34; 95% CI [0.08; 0.61]; p = 0.012, for the partially adjusted model). However, this association was no longer significant in the fully adjusted model (N = 165) (B = 0.25; 95% CI [- 0.02; 0.51]; p = 0.07), where APOE 4 allele status emerged as a significant predictor (B = - 0.25, 95% CI [ - 0.45; - 0.04]; p = 0.02). This change may reflect the reduced statistical power due to smaller sample size and the confounding effect of the genetic risk factors. Among APOE 4 carriers, higher PBF quartiles (Q2-Q4) each predicted greater GCCS in unadjusted analyses; in the adjusted model, Q3 versus Q1 remained significant, but the overall model did not reach significance. Investigation into the change in PBF consumption from midlife to late-life revealed no association with late-life cognitive health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midlife PBF consumption did not show a significant independent association with late-life cognitive health after fully adjustment for confounders in this cohort of older Australian women. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution as the small sample size and confounding factors might have affected the ability to detect a subtle effect of PBF on cognition. Future research is needed to explore this relationship in larger, more diverse samples and its complex interaction with genetic risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"64 7\",\"pages\":\"292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03786-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03786-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:植物性食品(PBF)因其对身体健康的益处而闻名;然而,它对大脑健康的影响还不太清楚,尤其是对老年妇女的影响。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚老年妇女中年每日摄入PBF的不同比例与晚年认知健康之间的关系。方法:本研究使用来自妇女健康老龄化项目(WHAP)的186名妇女的数据,这些妇女在基线(1998年,年龄52-63岁)和随访(2012年,年龄66-77岁)时进行了饮食评估。根据基线时PBF在日常饮食中的比例,将该队列分为四分位数。采用全球认知综合评分(GCCS)评估晚年认知功能,GCCS是Cogstate电池13项认知测试z得分的汇总。建立了3种回归模型:未调整(N = 186)、部分调整(年龄、受教育程度、能量摄入,N = 186)和完全调整(年龄、受教育程度、能量摄入、BMI、体力活动、吸烟、apoe4等位基因状态,N = 165)。结果:在未调整和部分调整的模型(N = 186)中,第三四分位数(Q3)的女性(中年PBF摄入量第二高)晚年的GCCS明显高于最低四分位数(Q1)的女性(B = 0.39, 95% CI[0.13; 0.66];未调整模型p = 0.004; B = 0.34; 95% CI[0.08; 0.61];部分调整模型p = 0.012)。然而,在完全调整模型(N = 165)中,这种关联不再显著(B = 0.25; 95% CI [- 0.02; 0.51]; p = 0.07), APOE 4等位基因状态成为一个显著的预测因子(B = - 0.25, 95% CI [- 0.45; - 0.04]; p = 0.02)。这种变化可能反映了由于样本量较小和遗传风险因素的混杂效应而降低的统计效力。在apoe4携带者中,在未经调整的分析中,更高的PBF四分位数(Q2-Q4)分别预测更高的GCCS;在调整后的模型中,Q3相对Q1仍然显著,但整体模型没有达到显著性。调查发现,从中年到晚年PBF摄入量的变化与晚年认知健康没有关联。结论:在这个澳大利亚老年妇女队列中,在完全调整混杂因素后,中年PBF消费与晚年认知健康没有显着的独立关联。然而,这些发现应该谨慎解释,因为小样本量和混杂因素可能影响了检测PBF对认知的微妙影响的能力。未来的研究需要在更大、更多样化的样本中探索这种关系,以及它与遗传风险因素的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The proportion of plant-based food consumption during midlife and cognitive health in later life in Australian women: data from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project (WHAP).

Purpose: Plant-based food (PBF) is well-known for its benefits for physical health; however, its impacts on brain health are less well understood, especially in ageing women. This study aimed to examine the association between different proportions of midlife daily PBF intake and late-life cognitive health among ageing Australian women.

Methods: This study used data of 186 women who had dietary assessment at baseline (1998, aged 52-63) and cognitive assessments at follow-up (2012, aged 66-77) from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project (WHAP). The cohort was divided into quartiles according to the proportions of PBF in their daily diet at baseline. Late-life cognitive function was assessed by Global cognitive composite score (GCCS)-a summary of z-scores of 13 cognitive tests of the Cogstate battery. Three regression models were conducted: unadjusted (N = 186), partially adjusted (age, education, energy intake; N = 186), and fully adjusted (age, education, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, smoking, APOE 4 allele status, N = 165).

Results: In unadjusted and partially adjusted models (N = 186), women in the third quartile (Q3) (second highest consumption of PBF during midlife) had significantly higher GCCS in later life compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (B = 0.39, 95% CI [0.13; 0.66]; p = 0.004 for the unadjusted model; B = 0.34; 95% CI [0.08; 0.61]; p = 0.012, for the partially adjusted model). However, this association was no longer significant in the fully adjusted model (N = 165) (B = 0.25; 95% CI [- 0.02; 0.51]; p = 0.07), where APOE 4 allele status emerged as a significant predictor (B = - 0.25, 95% CI [ - 0.45; - 0.04]; p = 0.02). This change may reflect the reduced statistical power due to smaller sample size and the confounding effect of the genetic risk factors. Among APOE 4 carriers, higher PBF quartiles (Q2-Q4) each predicted greater GCCS in unadjusted analyses; in the adjusted model, Q3 versus Q1 remained significant, but the overall model did not reach significance. Investigation into the change in PBF consumption from midlife to late-life revealed no association with late-life cognitive health.

Conclusion: Midlife PBF consumption did not show a significant independent association with late-life cognitive health after fully adjustment for confounders in this cohort of older Australian women. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution as the small sample size and confounding factors might have affected the ability to detect a subtle effect of PBF on cognition. Future research is needed to explore this relationship in larger, more diverse samples and its complex interaction with genetic risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信