调查药物检测中假阳性结果的发生率。

Q3 Medicine
Kamil Możdżeń, Konrad Kaleta, Agnieszka Murawska, Edward Pędziwiatr, Julia Hypnar, Ilie Lastovetskyi, Mateusz Kęska, Barbara Lorkowska-Zawicka, Beata Bujak-Giżycka
{"title":"调查药物检测中假阳性结果的发生率。","authors":"Kamil Możdżeń, Konrad Kaleta, Agnieszka Murawska, Edward Pędziwiatr, Julia Hypnar, Ilie Lastovetskyi, Mateusz Kęska, Barbara Lorkowska-Zawicka, Beata Bujak-Giżycka","doi":"10.24425/fmc.2024.153287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunoassays are widely utilized in urine drug screens due to their simplicity, ease of automation, and rapid results, making them the standard for clinical and workplace drug testing, as well as in rehabilitation programs and legal systems. However, the potential for cross-reactivity with both structurally related and unrelated compounds increases the risk of false-positive results. This poses significant challenges for healthcare professionals, especially in populations undergoing routine drug testing, such as those in recovery or court-ordered monitoring programs. The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, which has resulted in countless deaths from both prescription and illicit opioids, underscores the critical importance of accurate drug detection methods. This review evaluates specialized drug assays, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. While immunoassays are highly sensitive, they often lack specificity, increasing the risk of false positives, which can affect clinical and legal decisions. This research also details substances prone to causing false positives, aiding clinicians in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12106,"journal":{"name":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","volume":"65 1","pages":"69-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the incidence of false positive outcomes in drug detection assays.\",\"authors\":\"Kamil Możdżeń, Konrad Kaleta, Agnieszka Murawska, Edward Pędziwiatr, Julia Hypnar, Ilie Lastovetskyi, Mateusz Kęska, Barbara Lorkowska-Zawicka, Beata Bujak-Giżycka\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/fmc.2024.153287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunoassays are widely utilized in urine drug screens due to their simplicity, ease of automation, and rapid results, making them the standard for clinical and workplace drug testing, as well as in rehabilitation programs and legal systems. However, the potential for cross-reactivity with both structurally related and unrelated compounds increases the risk of false-positive results. This poses significant challenges for healthcare professionals, especially in populations undergoing routine drug testing, such as those in recovery or court-ordered monitoring programs. The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, which has resulted in countless deaths from both prescription and illicit opioids, underscores the critical importance of accurate drug detection methods. This review evaluates specialized drug assays, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. While immunoassays are highly sensitive, they often lack specificity, increasing the risk of false positives, which can affect clinical and legal decisions. This research also details substances prone to causing false positives, aiding clinicians in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia medica Cracoviensia\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"69-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia medica Cracoviensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2024.153287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2024.153287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫测定法因其简单、易于自动化和快速结果而广泛应用于尿液药物筛查,使其成为临床和工作场所药物检测以及康复计划和法律系统的标准。然而,潜在的交叉反应与结构相关和不相关的化合物增加了假阳性结果的风险。这对医疗保健专业人员提出了重大挑战,特别是在接受常规药物测试的人群中,例如那些正在康复或法院下令监测项目的人群。在美国,阿片类药物持续流行,导致无数人死于处方和非法阿片类药物,这凸显了准确的药物检测方法的至关重要性。这篇综述评价了专门的药物分析方法,强调了它们的有效性和局限性。虽然免疫测定法高度敏感,但它们往往缺乏特异性,增加了假阳性的风险,这可能影响临床和法律决策。这项研究还详细说明了容易导致假阳性的物质,帮助临床医生做出明智的诊断和治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the incidence of false positive outcomes in drug detection assays.

Immunoassays are widely utilized in urine drug screens due to their simplicity, ease of automation, and rapid results, making them the standard for clinical and workplace drug testing, as well as in rehabilitation programs and legal systems. However, the potential for cross-reactivity with both structurally related and unrelated compounds increases the risk of false-positive results. This poses significant challenges for healthcare professionals, especially in populations undergoing routine drug testing, such as those in recovery or court-ordered monitoring programs. The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, which has resulted in countless deaths from both prescription and illicit opioids, underscores the critical importance of accurate drug detection methods. This review evaluates specialized drug assays, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. While immunoassays are highly sensitive, they often lack specificity, increasing the risk of false positives, which can affect clinical and legal decisions. This research also details substances prone to causing false positives, aiding clinicians in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia medica Cracoviensia
Folia medica Cracoviensia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信