脓毒症的高渗透性脱水:对初始液体管理的影响。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kyung-Eui Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Dong-Gon Hyun, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Hong Yeul Lee
{"title":"脓毒症的高渗透性脱水:对初始液体管理的影响。","authors":"Kyung-Eui Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Dong-Gon Hyun, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Hong Yeul Lee","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with sepsis are prone to hypovolemia which can lead to hyperosmolar dehydration and result in intracellular volume depletion. This study aimed to assess the effect of hyperosmolar dehydration on the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis and its potential as an indicator of optimal initial fluid management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing data prospectively collected between September 2019 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty tertiary- or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Hyperosmolar dehydration was defined as serum osmolarity greater than or equal to 295 mOsm/L. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared using logistic regression adjusted for key prognostic factors in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Restricted cubic-spline models were used to analyze the clinical outcomes using the pre-ICU fluid volume as a continuous variable. Of the 4,487 patients, 2,605 (58.1%) had hyperosmolar dehydration. After matching, 1,537 pairs were analyzed. The 30-day mortality was higher in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (29.9%) than in the non-dehydration group (27.3%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.39). Liberal fluid management (greater than30 mL/kg) before ICU admission was associated with improved lactate levels in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (p = 0.009) without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score (p = 0.111). Among patients without dehydration, liberal fluid management was associated with an increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.034) and a higher risk for mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and without improving lactate levels (p = 0.388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyperosmolar dehydration at the diagnosis of sepsis was associated with increased 30-day mortality. A liberal fluid management benefits patients with hyperosmolar dehydration by improving lactate levels without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score. These findings highlight the importance of individualized fluid management based on the dehydration status in sepsis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyperosmolar Dehydration in Sepsis: Implications for Initial Fluid Management.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Eui Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Dong-Gon Hyun, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Hong Yeul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with sepsis are prone to hypovolemia which can lead to hyperosmolar dehydration and result in intracellular volume depletion. This study aimed to assess the effect of hyperosmolar dehydration on the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis and its potential as an indicator of optimal initial fluid management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing data prospectively collected between September 2019 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty tertiary- or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Hyperosmolar dehydration was defined as serum osmolarity greater than or equal to 295 mOsm/L. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared using logistic regression adjusted for key prognostic factors in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Restricted cubic-spline models were used to analyze the clinical outcomes using the pre-ICU fluid volume as a continuous variable. Of the 4,487 patients, 2,605 (58.1%) had hyperosmolar dehydration. After matching, 1,537 pairs were analyzed. The 30-day mortality was higher in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (29.9%) than in the non-dehydration group (27.3%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.39). Liberal fluid management (greater than30 mL/kg) before ICU admission was associated with improved lactate levels in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (p = 0.009) without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score (p = 0.111). Among patients without dehydration, liberal fluid management was associated with an increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.034) and a higher risk for mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and without improving lactate levels (p = 0.388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyperosmolar dehydration at the diagnosis of sepsis was associated with increased 30-day mortality. A liberal fluid management benefits patients with hyperosmolar dehydration by improving lactate levels without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score. These findings highlight the importance of individualized fluid management based on the dehydration status in sepsis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006891\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症患者易出现低血容量,低血容量可导致高渗性脱水,导致细胞内容量耗损。本研究旨在评估高渗透性脱水对脓毒症患者临床结果的影响及其作为最佳初始液体管理指标的潜力。设计:一项全国性的倾向评分匹配队列研究,分析2019年9月至2021年12月期间前瞻性收集的数据。地点:韩国20所三级医院或大学附属医院。患者:ICU收治的脓毒症或感染性休克的成年患者。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:高渗性脱水定义为血清渗透压大于或等于295 mOsm/L。在1:1倾向评分匹配的队列中,采用调整关键预后因素的逻辑回归对主要结局(30天死亡率)进行比较。使用限制性三次样条模型分析临床结果,将icu前的体液量作为连续变量。在4487例患者中,2605例(58.1%)患有高渗性脱水。匹配后,分析了1537对。高渗性脱水组的30天死亡率(29.9%)高于非脱水组(27.3%)(校正优势比1.18;95% CI, 1.00-1.39)。入院前自由输液(大于30 mL/kg)与高渗性脱水组乳酸水平改善相关(p = 0.009),但未增加序次器官衰竭评估评分(p = 0.111)。在没有脱水的患者中,自由液体管理与序序器官衰竭评估评分增加(p = 0.034)和机械通气风险增加(p < 0.001)相关,并且没有改善乳酸水平(p = 0.388)。结论:败血症诊断时的高渗性脱水与30天死亡率增加有关。自由液体管理通过改善乳酸水平而不增加序贯器官衰竭评估评分,使高渗性脱水患者受益。这些发现强调了在脓毒症管理中基于脱水状态的个体化液体管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hyperosmolar Dehydration in Sepsis: Implications for Initial Fluid Management.

Objective: Patients with sepsis are prone to hypovolemia which can lead to hyperosmolar dehydration and result in intracellular volume depletion. This study aimed to assess the effect of hyperosmolar dehydration on the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis and its potential as an indicator of optimal initial fluid management.

Design: A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing data prospectively collected between September 2019 and December 2021.

Setting: Twenty tertiary- or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea.

Patients: Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the ICU.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Hyperosmolar dehydration was defined as serum osmolarity greater than or equal to 295 mOsm/L. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared using logistic regression adjusted for key prognostic factors in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Restricted cubic-spline models were used to analyze the clinical outcomes using the pre-ICU fluid volume as a continuous variable. Of the 4,487 patients, 2,605 (58.1%) had hyperosmolar dehydration. After matching, 1,537 pairs were analyzed. The 30-day mortality was higher in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (29.9%) than in the non-dehydration group (27.3%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.39). Liberal fluid management (greater than30 mL/kg) before ICU admission was associated with improved lactate levels in the hyperosmolar dehydration group (p = 0.009) without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score (p = 0.111). Among patients without dehydration, liberal fluid management was associated with an increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.034) and a higher risk for mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and without improving lactate levels (p = 0.388).

Conclusions: Hyperosmolar dehydration at the diagnosis of sepsis was associated with increased 30-day mortality. A liberal fluid management benefits patients with hyperosmolar dehydration by improving lactate levels without increasing sequential organ failure assessment score. These findings highlight the importance of individualized fluid management based on the dehydration status in sepsis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信