别赫捷列夫案例:双海马损伤导致健忘症,比HM早50年。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sergio Della Sala , Marco Catani , Luciano Mecacci
{"title":"别赫捷列夫案例:双海马损伤导致健忘症,比HM早50年。","authors":"Sergio Della Sala ,&nbsp;Marco Catani ,&nbsp;Luciano Mecacci","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The association between the hippocampus and memory has been largely shaped by the landmark case of patient HM in the mid-20th century. However, this manuscript revisits an overlooked and historically significant case reported by Russian neurologist Vladimir M. Bekhterev in 1899, predating HM by five decades. Bekhterev documented a patient with profound amnesia and bilateral hippocampal damage, which he presented in Russian and German abstracts and later summarized in his 1907 work. Despite the anatomical specificity and clinical relevance of the case, highlighting the involvement of the hippocampus in memory and possibly the amygdala in apathy, its theoretical implications remained underappreciated due to contextual, theoretical, and political factors. Bekhterev's reluctance to endorse strict localization of cognitive functions, the dominance of associationist theories in Russian neuroscience, and his politically motivated erasure during Stalin's regime contributed to the case's historical neglect. This paper reconstructs Bekhterev's original reports, revaluates their relevance, and situates them in the broader context of early hippocampal research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 165-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bekhterev’s case: Amnesia due to bi-hippocampal damage 50 years before HM\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Della Sala ,&nbsp;Marco Catani ,&nbsp;Luciano Mecacci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The association between the hippocampus and memory has been largely shaped by the landmark case of patient HM in the mid-20th century. However, this manuscript revisits an overlooked and historically significant case reported by Russian neurologist Vladimir M. Bekhterev in 1899, predating HM by five decades. Bekhterev documented a patient with profound amnesia and bilateral hippocampal damage, which he presented in Russian and German abstracts and later summarized in his 1907 work. Despite the anatomical specificity and clinical relevance of the case, highlighting the involvement of the hippocampus in memory and possibly the amygdala in apathy, its theoretical implications remained underappreciated due to contextual, theoretical, and political factors. Bekhterev's reluctance to endorse strict localization of cognitive functions, the dominance of associationist theories in Russian neuroscience, and his politically motivated erasure during Stalin's regime contributed to the case's historical neglect. This paper reconstructs Bekhterev's original reports, revaluates their relevance, and situates them in the broader context of early hippocampal research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cortex\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001094522500245X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001094522500245X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海马体和记忆之间的联系在很大程度上是由20世纪中期具有里程碑意义的HM患者病例形成的。然而,这份手稿回顾了1899年俄罗斯神经学家Vladimir M. Bekhterev报告的一个被忽视的历史上重要的病例,比HM早了50年。别赫捷列夫记录了一位患有严重健忘症和双侧海马体损伤的病人,他在俄语和德语中提出了这一情况,后来在他1907年的著作中进行了总结。尽管该病例具有解剖学特异性和临床相关性,强调海马参与记忆,杏仁核可能参与冷漠,但由于环境、理论和政治因素,其理论意义仍未得到充分重视。别赫捷列夫不愿支持认知功能的严格定位,联想主义理论在俄罗斯神经科学中的主导地位,以及他在斯大林政权期间出于政治动机的抹去,这些都导致了这个案例的历史忽视。本文重构了Bekhterev的原始报告,重新评估了它们的相关性,并将它们置于早期海马研究的更广泛背景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bekhterev’s case: Amnesia due to bi-hippocampal damage 50 years before HM
The association between the hippocampus and memory has been largely shaped by the landmark case of patient HM in the mid-20th century. However, this manuscript revisits an overlooked and historically significant case reported by Russian neurologist Vladimir M. Bekhterev in 1899, predating HM by five decades. Bekhterev documented a patient with profound amnesia and bilateral hippocampal damage, which he presented in Russian and German abstracts and later summarized in his 1907 work. Despite the anatomical specificity and clinical relevance of the case, highlighting the involvement of the hippocampus in memory and possibly the amygdala in apathy, its theoretical implications remained underappreciated due to contextual, theoretical, and political factors. Bekhterev's reluctance to endorse strict localization of cognitive functions, the dominance of associationist theories in Russian neuroscience, and his politically motivated erasure during Stalin's regime contributed to the case's historical neglect. This paper reconstructs Bekhterev's original reports, revaluates their relevance, and situates them in the broader context of early hippocampal research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信