散发性肿瘤性食道机械吞咽困难患者的特定生物心理社会因素的纵向EAT-10评分模式:1例报告。

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Case Reports in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000547735
Amos Mapesa Washika, Javan Lukandu, Walter Abila Akello, Denis Gachigi Kinuthia
{"title":"散发性肿瘤性食道机械吞咽困难患者的特定生物心理社会因素的纵向EAT-10评分模式:1例报告。","authors":"Amos Mapesa Washika, Javan Lukandu, Walter Abila Akello, Denis Gachigi Kinuthia","doi":"10.1159/000547735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical dysphagia is due to oesophageal structural alteration and presents a major nutritional concern among neoplastic oesophageal patients. The biopsychosocial factors still do influence residual physiological swallowing mechanisms in the setting of oesophageal neoplasms. Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) has traditionally been used cross-sectionally by clinicians to screen for dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥3) and identify aspiration at-risk dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥15). In this case report, EAT-10 has been longitudinally used as a patient-reported outcome of various biopsychosocial settings on a sporadically occurring dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report is on the patterns of longitudinally taken post-prandial EAT-10 score in a patient in his 70s presenting with sporadic neoplastic dysphagia of the oesophagus. The scores were taken after meals of the same amount and consistency, but in different settings, i.e., meals taken post-fasting, in isolation, at social gatherings, before and after the first as well as the last induction chemotherapy. The observations for each setting were taken serially for 20 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EAT-10 scores in social gathering, before initiation, and at the end of induction chemotherapy were high while meals served in isolation, post-fasting, and soon after initiation of induction chemotherapy had low EAT-10 scores, indicating the likelihood of biopsychosocial modulation on residual swallowing mechanisms. EAT-10 score influenced by modifiable biopsychosocial factors aided in delivering instructions tailored on how to improve oral food intake, body nutrition, and response to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9625,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Oncology","volume":"18 1","pages":"1228-1238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal EAT-10 Score Pattern in Specific Biopsychosocial Factors in a Patient with Sporadic Neoplastic Mechanical Dysphagia of the Oesophagus: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Amos Mapesa Washika, Javan Lukandu, Walter Abila Akello, Denis Gachigi Kinuthia\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical dysphagia is due to oesophageal structural alteration and presents a major nutritional concern among neoplastic oesophageal patients. The biopsychosocial factors still do influence residual physiological swallowing mechanisms in the setting of oesophageal neoplasms. Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) has traditionally been used cross-sectionally by clinicians to screen for dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥3) and identify aspiration at-risk dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥15). In this case report, EAT-10 has been longitudinally used as a patient-reported outcome of various biopsychosocial settings on a sporadically occurring dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report is on the patterns of longitudinally taken post-prandial EAT-10 score in a patient in his 70s presenting with sporadic neoplastic dysphagia of the oesophagus. The scores were taken after meals of the same amount and consistency, but in different settings, i.e., meals taken post-fasting, in isolation, at social gatherings, before and after the first as well as the last induction chemotherapy. The observations for each setting were taken serially for 20 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EAT-10 scores in social gathering, before initiation, and at the end of induction chemotherapy were high while meals served in isolation, post-fasting, and soon after initiation of induction chemotherapy had low EAT-10 scores, indicating the likelihood of biopsychosocial modulation on residual swallowing mechanisms. EAT-10 score influenced by modifiable biopsychosocial factors aided in delivering instructions tailored on how to improve oral food intake, body nutrition, and response to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Reports in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1228-1238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Reports in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:机械性吞咽困难是由于食道结构改变,是食道肿瘤患者的主要营养问题。在食管癌的情况下,生物心理社会因素仍然影响残留的生理性吞咽机制。进食评估工具(EAT-10)传统上被临床医生用于筛查吞咽困难患者(EAT-10≥3)和识别吸入风险吞咽困难患者(EAT-10≥15)。在本病例报告中,EAT-10已被长期用作患者报告的各种生物心理社会环境对偶发性吞咽困难的结果。病例报告:本病例报告的是一位70多岁的患者,以散发性食道肿瘤性吞咽困难为表现,在餐后进行纵向进食-10评分。得分是在相同数量和一致性的用餐后,但在不同的环境下进行的,即禁食后,隔离,社交聚会,第一次和最后一次诱导化疗前后的用餐。每组连续观察20天。结论:社交聚会、诱导化疗开始前和诱导化疗结束时的EAT-10评分较高,而隔离用餐、禁食后和诱导化疗开始后不久的EAT-10评分较低,表明可能存在生物心理社会调节对残余吞咽机制的影响。EAT-10评分受可改变的生物心理社会因素的影响,有助于提供量身定制的指导,以改善口服食物摄入、身体营养和对治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal EAT-10 Score Pattern in Specific Biopsychosocial Factors in a Patient with Sporadic Neoplastic Mechanical Dysphagia of the Oesophagus: A Case Report.

Introduction: Mechanical dysphagia is due to oesophageal structural alteration and presents a major nutritional concern among neoplastic oesophageal patients. The biopsychosocial factors still do influence residual physiological swallowing mechanisms in the setting of oesophageal neoplasms. Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) has traditionally been used cross-sectionally by clinicians to screen for dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥3) and identify aspiration at-risk dysphagic patients (EAT-10 ≥15). In this case report, EAT-10 has been longitudinally used as a patient-reported outcome of various biopsychosocial settings on a sporadically occurring dysphagia.

Case presentation: This case report is on the patterns of longitudinally taken post-prandial EAT-10 score in a patient in his 70s presenting with sporadic neoplastic dysphagia of the oesophagus. The scores were taken after meals of the same amount and consistency, but in different settings, i.e., meals taken post-fasting, in isolation, at social gatherings, before and after the first as well as the last induction chemotherapy. The observations for each setting were taken serially for 20 days.

Conclusion: EAT-10 scores in social gathering, before initiation, and at the end of induction chemotherapy were high while meals served in isolation, post-fasting, and soon after initiation of induction chemotherapy had low EAT-10 scores, indicating the likelihood of biopsychosocial modulation on residual swallowing mechanisms. EAT-10 score influenced by modifiable biopsychosocial factors aided in delivering instructions tailored on how to improve oral food intake, body nutrition, and response to treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信