基于深度学习的非门控胸部CT冠状动脉钙评分与2型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yidan Xu, Yarong Yu, Xiaoying Ding, Jiajun Yuan, Lihua Yu, Xu Dai, Runjianya Ling, Yufan Wang, Jiayin Zhang
{"title":"基于深度学习的非门控胸部CT冠状动脉钙评分与2型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件","authors":"Yidan Xu, Yarong Yu, Xiaoying Ding, Jiajun Yuan, Lihua Yu, Xu Dai, Runjianya Ling, Yufan Wang, Jiayin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02934-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning (DL) models can quantify coronary artery calcification using non-gated chest CT scans. However, the prognostic value of a DL-based coronary artery calcium score (DL-CACS) for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT scans in patients with T2DM and to develop a risk stratification model for predicting MACEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with T2DM who underwent non-gated chest CT scans were retrospectively included and followed up for at least 2 years. Patients from Hospital A were randomly assigned to a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 3:2 ratio. Two predictive models were developed in the training cohort: Model 1 used the Framingham risk score (FRS), and Model 2 incorporated FRS and DL-CACS. The external validation cohort from Hospital B and the internal validation cohort were used to validate the proposed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,241 patients with T2DM (median age, 61 years; range, 54-68 years; 1,257 males) were included in this study. MACEs occurred in 10.71% (240/2241) of patients during follow-up. Patients who experienced MACEs exhibited significantly higher DL-CACS values than those without MACEs (p < 0.001). In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified DL-CACS as an independent predictor of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p < 0.001). Moreover, Model 2 demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to Model 1 across the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. In the external validation cohort, the C-index of Model 2 was larger than that of Model 1 (C-Index, 0.70 [0.63-0.77] vs. 0.67 [0.61-0.74]; p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT is an independent predictor of MACEs and provides incremental value in risk stratification for patients with T2DM compared with the FRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"389"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based coronary calcium score derived from non-gated chest CT and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Yidan Xu, Yarong Yu, Xiaoying Ding, Jiajun Yuan, Lihua Yu, Xu Dai, Runjianya Ling, Yufan Wang, Jiayin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12933-025-02934-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning (DL) models can quantify coronary artery calcification using non-gated chest CT scans. However, the prognostic value of a DL-based coronary artery calcium score (DL-CACS) for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT scans in patients with T2DM and to develop a risk stratification model for predicting MACEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with T2DM who underwent non-gated chest CT scans were retrospectively included and followed up for at least 2 years. Patients from Hospital A were randomly assigned to a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 3:2 ratio. Two predictive models were developed in the training cohort: Model 1 used the Framingham risk score (FRS), and Model 2 incorporated FRS and DL-CACS. The external validation cohort from Hospital B and the internal validation cohort were used to validate the proposed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,241 patients with T2DM (median age, 61 years; range, 54-68 years; 1,257 males) were included in this study. MACEs occurred in 10.71% (240/2241) of patients during follow-up. Patients who experienced MACEs exhibited significantly higher DL-CACS values than those without MACEs (p < 0.001). In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified DL-CACS as an independent predictor of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p < 0.001). Moreover, Model 2 demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to Model 1 across the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. In the external validation cohort, the C-index of Model 2 was larger than that of Model 1 (C-Index, 0.70 [0.63-0.77] vs. 0.67 [0.61-0.74]; p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT is an independent predictor of MACEs and provides incremental value in risk stratification for patients with T2DM compared with the FRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02934-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02934-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深度学习(DL)模型可以通过非门控胸部CT扫描量化冠状动脉钙化。然而,基于dl的冠状动脉钙评分(DL-CACS)预测2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者主要不良心血管事件(mace)的预后价值尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估T2DM患者非门控胸部CT扫描所得DL-CACS的预后价值,并建立预测mace的风险分层模型。方法:回顾性纳入接受非门控胸部CT扫描的T2DM患者,并随访至少2年。A医院的患者被随机分配到训练队列和内部验证队列,比例为3:2。在培训队列中建立了两个预测模型:模型1采用Framingham风险评分(FRS),模型2采用FRS和DL-CACS。来自B医院的外部验证队列和内部验证队列被用来验证所提出的模型。结果:本研究共纳入2241例T2DM患者(中位年龄61岁,范围54-68岁,男性1257例)。随访期间,10.71%(240/2241)的患者出现mace。经历过mace的患者DL-CACS值明显高于没有mace的患者(p结论:非门控胸部CT得出的DL-CACS是mace的独立预测因子,与FRS相比,对T2DM患者的风险分层提供了增加的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning-based coronary calcium score derived from non-gated chest CT and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: Deep learning (DL) models can quantify coronary artery calcification using non-gated chest CT scans. However, the prognostic value of a DL-based coronary artery calcium score (DL-CACS) for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT scans in patients with T2DM and to develop a risk stratification model for predicting MACEs.

Methods: Patients with T2DM who underwent non-gated chest CT scans were retrospectively included and followed up for at least 2 years. Patients from Hospital A were randomly assigned to a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 3:2 ratio. Two predictive models were developed in the training cohort: Model 1 used the Framingham risk score (FRS), and Model 2 incorporated FRS and DL-CACS. The external validation cohort from Hospital B and the internal validation cohort were used to validate the proposed model.

Results: A total of 2,241 patients with T2DM (median age, 61 years; range, 54-68 years; 1,257 males) were included in this study. MACEs occurred in 10.71% (240/2241) of patients during follow-up. Patients who experienced MACEs exhibited significantly higher DL-CACS values than those without MACEs (p < 0.001). In the training cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified DL-CACS as an independent predictor of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p < 0.001). Moreover, Model 2 demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to Model 1 across the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. In the external validation cohort, the C-index of Model 2 was larger than that of Model 1 (C-Index, 0.70 [0.63-0.77] vs. 0.67 [0.61-0.74]; p = 0.007).

Conclusion: DL-CACS derived from non-gated chest CT is an independent predictor of MACEs and provides incremental value in risk stratification for patients with T2DM compared with the FRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信