基于SERVQUAL模型的患者与牙医沟通满意度及牙科护理服务满意度测评工具的设计与心理测量学评估。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kimia Shariatzadeh, Ahmad Reza Shamshiri, Arefeh Riyahi, Mahdia Gholami
{"title":"基于SERVQUAL模型的患者与牙医沟通满意度及牙科护理服务满意度测评工具的设计与心理测量学评估。","authors":"Kimia Shariatzadeh, Ahmad Reza Shamshiri, Arefeh Riyahi, Mahdia Gholami","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06864-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good communication between the patient and the dentist is one of the factors affecting patient satisfaction with the dental care received. The aim of this study was to design a Farsi instrument to determine patients' satisfaction with dental services and communication with the dentist based on the SERVQUAL model. The psychometric properties of the instrument were investigated on adult patients referred to the School of Dentistry at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires related to the topic were searched in 2021, and the appropriate items based on the domains of the SERVQUAL model were extracted. The items were revised and completed to develop the initial version of the instrument. Face validity and content validity of the instrument were assessed. The content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated subsequently. Convergent validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the instrument's domains and the Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ) using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percentage of agreement were employed to check the tool's reliability in terms of internal consistency and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire had good content validity. (CVR ≥ 0.6, CVI ≥ 0.86), convergent validity (PCC of 0.68 between overall satisfaction based on the SERVQUAL instrument and DSQ, and construct validity (Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.83, Comparative Fit (CFI) = 0.92 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.006). The percentage of agreement of the items was in the range of %50-%76. The ICC for different domains of the instrument was estimated from 81 to 84%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric evaluation of the designed instrument showed that it was a valid and reliable tool in Farsi for determining the level of patients' satisfaction with the quality of dental services received and communication with the dentist.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and psychometric evaluation of an Instrument to assess patient's satisfaction from communication with dentist and dental care services based on SERVQUAL model.\",\"authors\":\"Kimia Shariatzadeh, Ahmad Reza Shamshiri, Arefeh Riyahi, Mahdia Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06864-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good communication between the patient and the dentist is one of the factors affecting patient satisfaction with the dental care received. The aim of this study was to design a Farsi instrument to determine patients' satisfaction with dental services and communication with the dentist based on the SERVQUAL model. The psychometric properties of the instrument were investigated on adult patients referred to the School of Dentistry at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires related to the topic were searched in 2021, and the appropriate items based on the domains of the SERVQUAL model were extracted. The items were revised and completed to develop the initial version of the instrument. Face validity and content validity of the instrument were assessed. The content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated subsequently. Convergent validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the instrument's domains and the Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ) using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percentage of agreement were employed to check the tool's reliability in terms of internal consistency and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire had good content validity. (CVR ≥ 0.6, CVI ≥ 0.86), convergent validity (PCC of 0.68 between overall satisfaction based on the SERVQUAL instrument and DSQ, and construct validity (Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.83, Comparative Fit (CFI) = 0.92 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.006). The percentage of agreement of the items was in the range of %50-%76. The ICC for different domains of the instrument was estimated from 81 to 84%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric evaluation of the designed instrument showed that it was a valid and reliable tool in Farsi for determining the level of patients' satisfaction with the quality of dental services received and communication with the dentist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06864-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06864-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者与牙医之间良好的沟通是影响患者对所接受的牙科护理满意度的因素之一。本研究的目的是设计一种基于SERVQUAL模型的波斯语仪器来测定患者对牙科服务的满意度和与牙医的沟通。该仪器的心理测量特性在德黑兰医学大学牙科学院的成年患者中进行了调查。方法:检索2021年与该主题相关的问卷,根据SERVQUAL模型的域提取合适的条目。修订和完成了这些项目,以制定文书的初始版本。评估了量表的表面效度和内容效度。随后计算内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)。通过使用Pearson相关系数(PCC)计算器械域与牙科满意度问卷(DSQ)之间的相关性来评估收敛效度。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)检验结构效度。采用Cronbach’s alpha、类内相关系数(ICC)和一致性百分比来检查工具在内部一致性和可重复性方面的可靠性。结果:问卷具有较好的内容效度。(CVR≥0.6,CVI≥0.86),收敛效度(基于SERVQUAL工具的总体满意度与DSQ的PCC为0.68),结构效度(拟合优度指数(GFI) = 0.83,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.92,均方根误差(RMSE) = 0.006)。项目的一致百分比在%50-%76之间。该仪器不同领域的ICC估计为81%至84%。Cronbach’s alpha为0.96。结论:对所设计的仪器进行心理测量,结果表明该仪器是一种有效、可靠的波斯语患者对所接受的牙科服务质量和与牙医沟通的满意度的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and psychometric evaluation of an Instrument to assess patient's satisfaction from communication with dentist and dental care services based on SERVQUAL model.

Background: Good communication between the patient and the dentist is one of the factors affecting patient satisfaction with the dental care received. The aim of this study was to design a Farsi instrument to determine patients' satisfaction with dental services and communication with the dentist based on the SERVQUAL model. The psychometric properties of the instrument were investigated on adult patients referred to the School of Dentistry at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Methods: Questionnaires related to the topic were searched in 2021, and the appropriate items based on the domains of the SERVQUAL model were extracted. The items were revised and completed to develop the initial version of the instrument. Face validity and content validity of the instrument were assessed. The content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated subsequently. Convergent validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the instrument's domains and the Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ) using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percentage of agreement were employed to check the tool's reliability in terms of internal consistency and reproducibility.

Results: The questionnaire had good content validity. (CVR ≥ 0.6, CVI ≥ 0.86), convergent validity (PCC of 0.68 between overall satisfaction based on the SERVQUAL instrument and DSQ, and construct validity (Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.83, Comparative Fit (CFI) = 0.92 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.006). The percentage of agreement of the items was in the range of %50-%76. The ICC for different domains of the instrument was estimated from 81 to 84%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.96.

Conclusion: The psychometric evaluation of the designed instrument showed that it was a valid and reliable tool in Farsi for determining the level of patients' satisfaction with the quality of dental services received and communication with the dentist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信