Mousa Khalafi, Saeid Fatolahi, Michael E Symonds, Farnaz Dinizadeh, Sara K Rosenkranz, Alexios Batrakoulis
{"title":"运动类型对前驱糖尿病和2型糖尿病患者内脏脂肪组织的比较疗效:一项系统综述,两两和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Mousa Khalafi, Saeid Fatolahi, Michael E Symonds, Farnaz Dinizadeh, Sara K Rosenkranz, Alexios Batrakoulis","doi":"10.1111/obr.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses was to examine the effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using four main keywords including \"exercise training,\" \"visceral fat,\" \"diabetes,\" and \"randomization\" from inception to April 2025. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials or clinical trials with parallel groups were included (1740 patients), in which exercise training was compared with either nonexercise or other types of exercise training. Combined training (n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.30], p = 0.001), high-intensity interval training (n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.19], p = 0.001), and aerobic training (n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.18], p = 0.001), but not resistance training (n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03], p = 0.08) were more effective for reducing VAT as compared with controls. Subgroup analyses based on age, health status, body mass index, or intervention duration confirmed that combined training, high-intensity interval training, aerobic training, but not resistance training, induced advantageous alterations in VAT compared to the control group. The main findings show that the P-score-based ranking of interventions reported the highest probability ranking for CT (0.89), followed by HIIT (0.76), AT (0.52), and RT (0.32). These findings provide compelling evidence to support the use of exercise training as a noninvasive and cost-effective nonpharmacological intervention for the reduction of VAT in patients with prediabetes and T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024598045.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Type on Visceral Adipose Tissue in Patients With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Mousa Khalafi, Saeid Fatolahi, Michael E Symonds, Farnaz Dinizadeh, Sara K Rosenkranz, Alexios Batrakoulis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses was to examine the effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using four main keywords including \\\"exercise training,\\\" \\\"visceral fat,\\\" \\\"diabetes,\\\" and \\\"randomization\\\" from inception to April 2025. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials or clinical trials with parallel groups were included (1740 patients), in which exercise training was compared with either nonexercise or other types of exercise training. Combined training (n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.30], p = 0.001), high-intensity interval training (n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.19], p = 0.001), and aerobic training (n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.18], p = 0.001), but not resistance training (n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03], p = 0.08) were more effective for reducing VAT as compared with controls. Subgroup analyses based on age, health status, body mass index, or intervention duration confirmed that combined training, high-intensity interval training, aerobic training, but not resistance training, induced advantageous alterations in VAT compared to the control group. The main findings show that the P-score-based ranking of interventions reported the highest probability ranking for CT (0.89), followed by HIIT (0.76), AT (0.52), and RT (0.32). These findings provide compelling evidence to support the use of exercise training as a noninvasive and cost-effective nonpharmacological intervention for the reduction of VAT in patients with prediabetes and T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024598045.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述采用两两和网络荟萃分析,目的是研究不同运动类型对糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者内脏脂肪组织(VAT)的影响。在PubMed, Web of Science和Scopus中使用“运动训练”,“内脏脂肪”,“糖尿病”和“随机化”四个主要关键词进行了全面搜索,从成立到2025年4月。包括33个随机对照试验或临床试验与平行组(1740例患者),其中运动训练与非运动或其他类型的运动训练进行比较。与对照组相比,联合训练(n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95至-0.30],p = 0.001)、高强度间歇训练(n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86至-0.19],p = 0.001)和有氧训练(n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59至-0.18],p = 0.001),但阻力训练(n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54至0.03],p = 0.08)在降低VAT方面更有效。基于年龄、健康状况、体重指数或干预持续时间的亚组分析证实,与对照组相比,联合训练、高强度间歇训练、有氧训练(而非阻力训练)诱导了有利的VAT改变。主要研究结果显示,基于p评分的干预措施排名中,CT(0.89)的概率排名最高,其次是HIIT(0.76)、AT(0.52)和RT(0.32)。这些发现提供了令人信服的证据,支持将运动训练作为一种无创的、具有成本效益的非药物干预手段,用于降低糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病患者的VAT。普洛斯彼罗注册号:crd42024598045。
Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Type on Visceral Adipose Tissue in Patients With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.
The aim of this systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses was to examine the effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using four main keywords including "exercise training," "visceral fat," "diabetes," and "randomization" from inception to April 2025. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials or clinical trials with parallel groups were included (1740 patients), in which exercise training was compared with either nonexercise or other types of exercise training. Combined training (n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.30], p = 0.001), high-intensity interval training (n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.19], p = 0.001), and aerobic training (n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.18], p = 0.001), but not resistance training (n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03], p = 0.08) were more effective for reducing VAT as compared with controls. Subgroup analyses based on age, health status, body mass index, or intervention duration confirmed that combined training, high-intensity interval training, aerobic training, but not resistance training, induced advantageous alterations in VAT compared to the control group. The main findings show that the P-score-based ranking of interventions reported the highest probability ranking for CT (0.89), followed by HIIT (0.76), AT (0.52), and RT (0.32). These findings provide compelling evidence to support the use of exercise training as a noninvasive and cost-effective nonpharmacological intervention for the reduction of VAT in patients with prediabetes and T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024598045.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.