Vanessa Clifford, Leonie Walter, Laura D. Klein, Tong Wu, Yiting Wang, Nidhi Bansal
{"title":"母乳库新加工技术评价框架。","authors":"Vanessa Clifford, Leonie Walter, Laura D. Klein, Tong Wu, Yiting Wang, Nidhi Bansal","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this review was to devise a framework for validation studies to test new processing technologies in human milk banking. Human milk banks are an expanding service globally. They provide donor human milk to predominantly preterm and low-birth-weight infants, who represent a vulnerable population. The most common method used by milk banks to ensure the safety of human milk is Holder pasteurization. There has been significant interest in recent years in alternative pathogen inactivation techniques for human milk banking, which may better preserve nutritional content while maintaining an appropriate safety profile. At present, there is no global standard for evaluating and validating new processing technologies for human milk. A major difficulty in developing a standard to evaluate novel processing methods for human milk is that it is not fully established which components of human milk, beyond macronutrient content, contribute to better clinical outcomes in preterm infants. A validation study should ideally address both the safety and nutritional impact of a new technology for human milk. For food safety, the main goal remains to achieve complete inactivation of relevant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The secondary goal is to ensure adequate nutritional quality of the final product, so that infants receive nutrition that is as close as possible to mother's own milk. We have done a comprehensive narrative review of the key safety parameters, and nutritional and immune components of human milk, to suggest a novel framework for process validation studies in human milk banking, including suggestions for sample size where appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Evaluation of New Processing Technologies in Human Milk Banking\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Clifford, Leonie Walter, Laura D. Klein, Tong Wu, Yiting Wang, Nidhi Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4337.70288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this review was to devise a framework for validation studies to test new processing technologies in human milk banking. Human milk banks are an expanding service globally. They provide donor human milk to predominantly preterm and low-birth-weight infants, who represent a vulnerable population. The most common method used by milk banks to ensure the safety of human milk is Holder pasteurization. There has been significant interest in recent years in alternative pathogen inactivation techniques for human milk banking, which may better preserve nutritional content while maintaining an appropriate safety profile. At present, there is no global standard for evaluating and validating new processing technologies for human milk. A major difficulty in developing a standard to evaluate novel processing methods for human milk is that it is not fully established which components of human milk, beyond macronutrient content, contribute to better clinical outcomes in preterm infants. A validation study should ideally address both the safety and nutritional impact of a new technology for human milk. For food safety, the main goal remains to achieve complete inactivation of relevant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The secondary goal is to ensure adequate nutritional quality of the final product, so that infants receive nutrition that is as close as possible to mother's own milk. We have done a comprehensive narrative review of the key safety parameters, and nutritional and immune components of human milk, to suggest a novel framework for process validation studies in human milk banking, including suggestions for sample size where appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70288\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70288\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Framework for Evaluation of New Processing Technologies in Human Milk Banking
The purpose of this review was to devise a framework for validation studies to test new processing technologies in human milk banking. Human milk banks are an expanding service globally. They provide donor human milk to predominantly preterm and low-birth-weight infants, who represent a vulnerable population. The most common method used by milk banks to ensure the safety of human milk is Holder pasteurization. There has been significant interest in recent years in alternative pathogen inactivation techniques for human milk banking, which may better preserve nutritional content while maintaining an appropriate safety profile. At present, there is no global standard for evaluating and validating new processing technologies for human milk. A major difficulty in developing a standard to evaluate novel processing methods for human milk is that it is not fully established which components of human milk, beyond macronutrient content, contribute to better clinical outcomes in preterm infants. A validation study should ideally address both the safety and nutritional impact of a new technology for human milk. For food safety, the main goal remains to achieve complete inactivation of relevant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The secondary goal is to ensure adequate nutritional quality of the final product, so that infants receive nutrition that is as close as possible to mother's own milk. We have done a comprehensive narrative review of the key safety parameters, and nutritional and immune components of human milk, to suggest a novel framework for process validation studies in human milk banking, including suggestions for sample size where appropriate.
期刊介绍:
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology.
CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results.
Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity.
The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.