欧洲统一方法评定建筑外墙防火性能的外墙热暴露数值研究

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Guoxiang Zhao, Johan Anderson, Anders Dragsted, Simo Hostikka, Karlis Livkiss
{"title":"欧洲统一方法评定建筑外墙防火性能的外墙热暴露数值研究","authors":"Guoxiang Zhao,&nbsp;Johan Anderson,&nbsp;Anders Dragsted,&nbsp;Simo Hostikka,&nbsp;Karlis Livkiss","doi":"10.1002/fam.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The European project “European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Facades” led by RISE, has been working toward the development of a harmonized European testing and assessment method for façade. In this study, we present numerical predictions of the thermal exposure on a noncombustible façade in the European test. Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), version 6.7.9, was employed as numerical model. The temperature inside the combustion chamber was underestimated by approximately 8.9%. The heat flux from the wood crib aligns well with the test results up to around 800 s, after which a deviation was observed, likely due to the way the wood crib was modeled. The heat flux at 1 m above the chamber opening was underestimated by 22.2%, while the plate thermometer temperature at the center of the fictitious window was underestimated by 17.6%. The overall trends along the vertical centerline were captured correctly, though overestimations were observed at most locations, except at 1 and 1.5 m above the chamber, with a maximum overestimation of 17.5% at 4.5 m above the chamber. The flame height was determined based on the predicted temperature, with an overestimation of 29.8%. However, this comparison has inherent limitations, primarily due to differences in the methods used to define the flame tip in experimental tests and numerical simulations. An analysis was conducted to assess the influence of the wood crib model on the fire dynamics in this large-scale test.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"49 7","pages":"1026-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Investigation of Thermal Exposure on External Walls in the Harmonized European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Façades\",\"authors\":\"Guoxiang Zhao,&nbsp;Johan Anderson,&nbsp;Anders Dragsted,&nbsp;Simo Hostikka,&nbsp;Karlis Livkiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fam.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The European project “European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Facades” led by RISE, has been working toward the development of a harmonized European testing and assessment method for façade. In this study, we present numerical predictions of the thermal exposure on a noncombustible façade in the European test. Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), version 6.7.9, was employed as numerical model. The temperature inside the combustion chamber was underestimated by approximately 8.9%. The heat flux from the wood crib aligns well with the test results up to around 800 s, after which a deviation was observed, likely due to the way the wood crib was modeled. The heat flux at 1 m above the chamber opening was underestimated by 22.2%, while the plate thermometer temperature at the center of the fictitious window was underestimated by 17.6%. The overall trends along the vertical centerline were captured correctly, though overestimations were observed at most locations, except at 1 and 1.5 m above the chamber, with a maximum overestimation of 17.5% at 4.5 m above the chamber. The flame height was determined based on the predicted temperature, with an overestimation of 29.8%. However, this comparison has inherent limitations, primarily due to differences in the methods used to define the flame tip in experimental tests and numerical simulations. An analysis was conducted to assess the influence of the wood crib model on the fire dynamics in this large-scale test.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"volume\":\"49 7\",\"pages\":\"1026-1044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由RISE领导的欧洲项目“评估外墙防火性能的欧洲方法”一直致力于开发统一的欧洲外墙测试和评估方法。在这项研究中,我们提出了数值预测的热暴露在一个不燃表面的欧洲测试。采用Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) 6.7.9版本作为数值模型。燃烧室内的温度被低估了约8.9%。木槽的热通量与测试结果在800s左右一致,之后观察到偏差,可能是由于木槽的建模方式。在腔室开口上方1 m处的热流密度被低估了22.2%,而在虚拟窗口中心的平板温度计温度被低估了17.6%。沿着垂直中心线的总体趋势被正确捕获,尽管在大多数位置观察到高估,除了在室上方1和1.5 m处,在室上方4.5 m处最大高估17.5%。火焰高度根据预测温度确定,高估了29.8%。然而,这种比较有固有的局限性,主要是由于在实验测试和数值模拟中用于定义火焰尖端的方法不同。在此大型试验中,分析了木槽模型对火灾动力学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Numerical Investigation of Thermal Exposure on External Walls in the Harmonized European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Façades

Numerical Investigation of Thermal Exposure on External Walls in the Harmonized European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Façades

The European project “European Approach to Assess the Fire Performance of Facades” led by RISE, has been working toward the development of a harmonized European testing and assessment method for façade. In this study, we present numerical predictions of the thermal exposure on a noncombustible façade in the European test. Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), version 6.7.9, was employed as numerical model. The temperature inside the combustion chamber was underestimated by approximately 8.9%. The heat flux from the wood crib aligns well with the test results up to around 800 s, after which a deviation was observed, likely due to the way the wood crib was modeled. The heat flux at 1 m above the chamber opening was underestimated by 22.2%, while the plate thermometer temperature at the center of the fictitious window was underestimated by 17.6%. The overall trends along the vertical centerline were captured correctly, though overestimations were observed at most locations, except at 1 and 1.5 m above the chamber, with a maximum overestimation of 17.5% at 4.5 m above the chamber. The flame height was determined based on the predicted temperature, with an overestimation of 29.8%. However, this comparison has inherent limitations, primarily due to differences in the methods used to define the flame tip in experimental tests and numerical simulations. An analysis was conducted to assess the influence of the wood crib model on the fire dynamics in this large-scale test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire and Materials
Fire and Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals. Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信