固体重力储能混合可再生能源系统的几何感知生命周期优化

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammed A. Hassan , Mohamad T. Araji
{"title":"固体重力储能混合可再生能源系统的几何感知生命周期优化","authors":"Muhammed A. Hassan ,&nbsp;Mohamad T. Araji","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 126879"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed A. Hassan ,&nbsp;Mohamad T. Araji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"402 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925016095\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925016095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市建筑面临着整合间歇性供应的可再生能源,同时符合空间和经济限制的挑战。固体重力储能(GS)虽然机械简单,寿命长,但尚未在建筑应用中进行探索。目前的文献缺乏将GS的最佳能力与建筑几何和能源强度联系起来的研究。本研究介绍了一种新型的建筑混合能源系统,该系统结合了安装在面板上的光伏板、小型屋顶风力涡轮机、锂离子电池和基于绳吊的GS。考虑实际调度逻辑和年运行情况,提出了一种多目标优化框架,以最小化平准化电力成本(LCOE)和电网依赖(GD)。该系统针对625个参数化建筑设计进行了优化,涵盖了不同的能源使用强度(EUI)和几何配置,由立面面积与体积、长度与宽度和高度与占地面积的比例定义。权衡方案的LCOE值在0.051至0.111美元/千瓦时之间,GD值在0.195至0.888之间。GS是对系统自主性影响最大的组成部分,其容量与建筑物日均需求的比值在0.0 ~ 1.0之间,且与GD有很强的相关性。大多数优化设计广泛使用光伏,适度使用风力涡轮机,最小限度地使用电池。投资回收期从9年到17年不等,碳强度值大多低于加拿大平均水平。总体而言,这项研究强调了建筑设计与GS系统以及太阳能和风能系统的规模之间的协同作用,从而为低碳和弹性建筑提供了一个实用的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage

Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage
Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信