{"title":"固体重力储能混合可再生能源系统的几何感知生命周期优化","authors":"Muhammed A. Hassan , Mohamad T. Araji","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 126879"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed A. Hassan , Mohamad T. Araji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"402 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925016095\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925016095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage
Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.