以创伤为重点的治疗对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为的长期效果:对创伤后症状和再次受害的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
María Crespo,M José Hernández-Lloreda,Carlos Hornillos
{"title":"以创伤为重点的治疗对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为的长期效果:对创伤后症状和再次受害的影响。","authors":"María Crespo,M José Hernández-Lloreda,Carlos Hornillos","doi":"10.1177/08862605251372567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed to test the clinical effectiveness in the mid- and long-term of two versions of a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and with a focus on trauma: (a) with the incorporation of positive memories evocation (CBT-M+); and (b) without such evocation (CBT). Ninety-one female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing CBT (n = 41) and CBT-M+ (n = 50). Pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up measures were obtained for: posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, impairment, and exposure to violence (psychological, physical, sexual, and injury). A total of 45.05% of women who entered treatment dropped out, without significant differences between treatments. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements along the follow-ups, with good effect sizes, for posttraumatic stress (ηp2 = 0.42), anxiety (ηp2 = 0.25), depression (ηp2 = 0.21), self-esteem (ηp2 = 0.33) and impairment (ηp2 = 0.28); group effect and time-group interactions were not significant. Both treatments significantly reduced the percentage of women diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder, while they also led to reductions in depression, low self-esteem, and impairment. In addition, CBT-M+ significantly reduced the percentage of women with anxiety problems. The presence of psychological (90%-52.5%), physical (82.5%-30%), and sexual (62.5%-15%) violence significantly decreased at 12 months for both treatments, while the decrease in injury was significant only for the CBT group. These results show that both versions of the treatment accomplished long-term effects, improving clinically and significantly women's emotional state and reducing revictimization, with no differences between them. Moreover, these improvements were consolidated and even increased over time. The study therefore provides valuable information about the potential of this CBT for women's overall recovery and healing.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry (ref. ISRCTN73702156) (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN73702156).","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"19 1","pages":"8862605251372567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Therapy for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Effects on Posttraumatic Symptoms and Revictimization.\",\"authors\":\"María Crespo,M José Hernández-Lloreda,Carlos Hornillos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251372567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study aimed to test the clinical effectiveness in the mid- and long-term of two versions of a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and with a focus on trauma: (a) with the incorporation of positive memories evocation (CBT-M+); and (b) without such evocation (CBT). Ninety-one female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing CBT (n = 41) and CBT-M+ (n = 50). Pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up measures were obtained for: posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, impairment, and exposure to violence (psychological, physical, sexual, and injury). A total of 45.05% of women who entered treatment dropped out, without significant differences between treatments. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements along the follow-ups, with good effect sizes, for posttraumatic stress (ηp2 = 0.42), anxiety (ηp2 = 0.25), depression (ηp2 = 0.21), self-esteem (ηp2 = 0.33) and impairment (ηp2 = 0.28); group effect and time-group interactions were not significant. Both treatments significantly reduced the percentage of women diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder, while they also led to reductions in depression, low self-esteem, and impairment. In addition, CBT-M+ significantly reduced the percentage of women with anxiety problems. The presence of psychological (90%-52.5%), physical (82.5%-30%), and sexual (62.5%-15%) violence significantly decreased at 12 months for both treatments, while the decrease in injury was significant only for the CBT group. These results show that both versions of the treatment accomplished long-term effects, improving clinically and significantly women's emotional state and reducing revictimization, with no differences between them. Moreover, these improvements were consolidated and even increased over time. The study therefore provides valuable information about the potential of this CBT for women's overall recovery and healing.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry (ref. ISRCTN73702156) (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN73702156).\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"8862605251372567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251372567\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251372567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究旨在测试针对亲密伴侣对妇女的暴力行为(IPVAW)的两种版本的认知行为疗法(CBT)的中期和长期临床效果,并以创伤为重点:(a)结合积极记忆唤起(CBT- m +);以及(b)没有此类唤起(CBT)。91名女性IPVAW幸存者进入了一项比较CBT (n = 41)和CBT- m + (n = 50)的随机对照试验。对创伤后应激、焦虑、抑郁、自尊、损伤和暴力暴露(心理、身体、性和伤害)进行预处理、治疗后以及3、6和12个月的随访测量。共有45.05%的妇女进入治疗后退出,治疗间无显著差异。两种治疗方法在创伤后应激(ηp2 = 0.42)、焦虑(ηp2 = 0.25)、抑郁(ηp2 = 0.21)、自尊(ηp2 = 0.33)和损伤(ηp2 = 0.28)方面均有显著改善,效果良好;组效应和时间-组交互作用不显著。这两种治疗方法都显著降低了被诊断为创伤后应激障碍的女性比例,同时也减少了抑郁、自卑和损伤的发生率。此外,CBT-M+显著降低了有焦虑问题的女性比例。心理暴力(90%-52.5%)、身体暴力(82.5%-30%)和性暴力(62.5%-15%)的出现在两种治疗中均在12个月时显著减少,而伤害的减少仅在CBT组中显著减少。这些结果表明,两种治疗方法都取得了长期效果,在临床上显著改善了女性的情绪状态,减少了再受害,两者之间没有差异。此外,随着时间的推移,这些改进得到了巩固,甚至有所增加。因此,该研究提供了有关CBT对女性整体恢复和愈合的潜力的有价值的信息。试验注册:ISRCTN Registry(参考号:ISRCTN73702156) (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN73702156)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Therapy for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Effects on Posttraumatic Symptoms and Revictimization.
The current study aimed to test the clinical effectiveness in the mid- and long-term of two versions of a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) tailored for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and with a focus on trauma: (a) with the incorporation of positive memories evocation (CBT-M+); and (b) without such evocation (CBT). Ninety-one female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing CBT (n = 41) and CBT-M+ (n = 50). Pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up measures were obtained for: posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, impairment, and exposure to violence (psychological, physical, sexual, and injury). A total of 45.05% of women who entered treatment dropped out, without significant differences between treatments. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements along the follow-ups, with good effect sizes, for posttraumatic stress (ηp2 = 0.42), anxiety (ηp2 = 0.25), depression (ηp2 = 0.21), self-esteem (ηp2 = 0.33) and impairment (ηp2 = 0.28); group effect and time-group interactions were not significant. Both treatments significantly reduced the percentage of women diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder, while they also led to reductions in depression, low self-esteem, and impairment. In addition, CBT-M+ significantly reduced the percentage of women with anxiety problems. The presence of psychological (90%-52.5%), physical (82.5%-30%), and sexual (62.5%-15%) violence significantly decreased at 12 months for both treatments, while the decrease in injury was significant only for the CBT group. These results show that both versions of the treatment accomplished long-term effects, improving clinically and significantly women's emotional state and reducing revictimization, with no differences between them. Moreover, these improvements were consolidated and even increased over time. The study therefore provides valuable information about the potential of this CBT for women's overall recovery and healing.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry (ref. ISRCTN73702156) (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN73702156).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信