{"title":"冠层藤本植物密度的增加是否会减少热带森林的碳汇?","authors":"Stefan A. Schnitzer, David M. DeFilippis","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ongoing decline in the American tropical forest carbon sink has serious ramifications for atmospheric carbon levels and global climate change. Increasing liana abundance may explain the decaying carbon sink because lianas reduce canopy tree growth and survival, which limits forest carbon storage. However, canopy lianas, not solely understory lianas, would have to be increasing for this hypothesis to be credible because canopy lianas compete especially intensely with canopy trees. We examined the change in canopy lianas over 10 years on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama to test two main hypotheses. (1) Canopy lianas are increasing on BCI. (2) Increasing canopy lianas decrease aboveground canopy tree and forest carbon storage. We found that canopy liana density increased 8.3% over the 10-year period, and canopy lianas outnumbered canopy trees 3.59–1. There was a clear negative relationship between increasing canopy liana density and decreasing canopy tree carbon storage. Where liana density increased, tree carbon decreased, and where canopy lianas decreased, canopy tree carbon increased. Our findings indicate that lianas are the numerically dominant and diverse woody plant group in the BCI canopy, and this dominance is increasing, reducing forest-level carbon storage and possibly explaining the decaying American tropical forest carbon sink.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does increasing canopy liana density decrease the tropical forest carbon sink?\",\"authors\":\"Stefan A. Schnitzer, David M. DeFilippis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.70196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ongoing decline in the American tropical forest carbon sink has serious ramifications for atmospheric carbon levels and global climate change. Increasing liana abundance may explain the decaying carbon sink because lianas reduce canopy tree growth and survival, which limits forest carbon storage. However, canopy lianas, not solely understory lianas, would have to be increasing for this hypothesis to be credible because canopy lianas compete especially intensely with canopy trees. We examined the change in canopy lianas over 10 years on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama to test two main hypotheses. (1) Canopy lianas are increasing on BCI. (2) Increasing canopy lianas decrease aboveground canopy tree and forest carbon storage. We found that canopy liana density increased 8.3% over the 10-year period, and canopy lianas outnumbered canopy trees 3.59–1. There was a clear negative relationship between increasing canopy liana density and decreasing canopy tree carbon storage. Where liana density increased, tree carbon decreased, and where canopy lianas decreased, canopy tree carbon increased. Our findings indicate that lianas are the numerically dominant and diverse woody plant group in the BCI canopy, and this dominance is increasing, reducing forest-level carbon storage and possibly explaining the decaying American tropical forest carbon sink.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"106 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70196\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does increasing canopy liana density decrease the tropical forest carbon sink?
The ongoing decline in the American tropical forest carbon sink has serious ramifications for atmospheric carbon levels and global climate change. Increasing liana abundance may explain the decaying carbon sink because lianas reduce canopy tree growth and survival, which limits forest carbon storage. However, canopy lianas, not solely understory lianas, would have to be increasing for this hypothesis to be credible because canopy lianas compete especially intensely with canopy trees. We examined the change in canopy lianas over 10 years on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama to test two main hypotheses. (1) Canopy lianas are increasing on BCI. (2) Increasing canopy lianas decrease aboveground canopy tree and forest carbon storage. We found that canopy liana density increased 8.3% over the 10-year period, and canopy lianas outnumbered canopy trees 3.59–1. There was a clear negative relationship between increasing canopy liana density and decreasing canopy tree carbon storage. Where liana density increased, tree carbon decreased, and where canopy lianas decreased, canopy tree carbon increased. Our findings indicate that lianas are the numerically dominant and diverse woody plant group in the BCI canopy, and this dominance is increasing, reducing forest-level carbon storage and possibly explaining the decaying American tropical forest carbon sink.
期刊介绍:
Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.