Joheen Chakraborty, Lisa V. Drummond, Matteo Bonetti, Alessia Franchini, Shubham Kejriwal, Giovanni Miniutti, Riccardo Arcodia, Scott A. Hughes, Francisco Duque, Erin Kara, Alberto Sesana, Margherita Giustini, Amedeo Motta and Kevin Burdge
{"title":"利用准周期喷发时间估计EMRI/MBH参数的前景:短时间尺度分析","authors":"Joheen Chakraborty, Lisa V. Drummond, Matteo Bonetti, Alessia Franchini, Shubham Kejriwal, Giovanni Miniutti, Riccardo Arcodia, Scott A. Hughes, Francisco Duque, Erin Kara, Alberto Sesana, Margherita Giustini, Amedeo Motta and Kevin Burdge","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ae003b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quasiperiodic eruptions (QPEs) are luminous, recurring X-ray outbursts from galactic nuclei, with timescales of hours to days. While their origin remains uncertain, leading models invoke accretion disk instabilities or the interaction of a massive black hole (MBH) with a lower-mass secondary in an extreme mass ratio inspiral (EMRI). EMRI scenarios offer a robust framework for interpreting QPEs by characterizing observational signatures associated with the secondary’s orbital dynamics. This, in turn, enables extraction of the MBH/EMRI physical properties and provides a means to test the EMRI scenario, distinguishing models and addressing the question: what can QPE timings teach us about MBHs and EMRIs? In this study, we employ analytic expressions for Kerr geodesics to efficiently resolve the trajectory of the secondary object and perform GPU-accelerated Bayesian inference to assess the information content of QPE timings. Using our inference framework, referred to as QPE-FIT (Fast Inference with Timing; https://github.com/joheenc/QPE-FIT/tree/main), we explore QPE timing constraints on astrophysical parameters, such as EMRI orbital parameters and MBH mass/spin. We find that mild-eccentricity EMRIs (e ∼ 0.1–0.3) can constrain MBH mass and EMRI semimajor axis/eccentricity to the 10% level within tens of orbital periods, while MBH spin is unconstrained for the explored semimajor axes ≥100Rg and monitoring baselines (10–100) orbits. Introducing a misaligned precessing disk generally degrades inference of EMRI orbital parameters, but can constrain disk precession properties within 10%–50%. This work both highlights the prospect of QPE observations as dynamical probes of galactic nuclei and outlines the challenge of doing so in the multimodal parameter space of EMRI–disk collisions.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospects for EMRI/MBH Parameter Estimation Using Quasiperiodic Eruption Timings: Short-timescale Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joheen Chakraborty, Lisa V. Drummond, Matteo Bonetti, Alessia Franchini, Shubham Kejriwal, Giovanni Miniutti, Riccardo Arcodia, Scott A. Hughes, Francisco Duque, Erin Kara, Alberto Sesana, Margherita Giustini, Amedeo Motta and Kevin Burdge\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4357/ae003b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quasiperiodic eruptions (QPEs) are luminous, recurring X-ray outbursts from galactic nuclei, with timescales of hours to days. While their origin remains uncertain, leading models invoke accretion disk instabilities or the interaction of a massive black hole (MBH) with a lower-mass secondary in an extreme mass ratio inspiral (EMRI). EMRI scenarios offer a robust framework for interpreting QPEs by characterizing observational signatures associated with the secondary’s orbital dynamics. This, in turn, enables extraction of the MBH/EMRI physical properties and provides a means to test the EMRI scenario, distinguishing models and addressing the question: what can QPE timings teach us about MBHs and EMRIs? In this study, we employ analytic expressions for Kerr geodesics to efficiently resolve the trajectory of the secondary object and perform GPU-accelerated Bayesian inference to assess the information content of QPE timings. Using our inference framework, referred to as QPE-FIT (Fast Inference with Timing; https://github.com/joheenc/QPE-FIT/tree/main), we explore QPE timing constraints on astrophysical parameters, such as EMRI orbital parameters and MBH mass/spin. We find that mild-eccentricity EMRIs (e ∼ 0.1–0.3) can constrain MBH mass and EMRI semimajor axis/eccentricity to the 10% level within tens of orbital periods, while MBH spin is unconstrained for the explored semimajor axes ≥100Rg and monitoring baselines (10–100) orbits. Introducing a misaligned precessing disk generally degrades inference of EMRI orbital parameters, but can constrain disk precession properties within 10%–50%. This work both highlights the prospect of QPE observations as dynamical probes of galactic nuclei and outlines the challenge of doing so in the multimodal parameter space of EMRI–disk collisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae003b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae003b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准周期爆发(qpe)是由星系核发出的明亮的、反复出现的x射线爆发,其时间尺度为几小时到几天。虽然它们的起源仍然不确定,但主要的模型援引了吸积盘的不稳定性或大质量黑洞(MBH)与低质量次级黑洞在极端质量比吸气(EMRI)中的相互作用。EMRI情景提供了一个强大的框架,通过表征与继发性轨道动力学相关的观测特征来解释qpe。反过来,这使得提取MBH/EMRI物理特性成为可能,并提供了一种测试EMRI场景、区分模型和解决问题的方法:QPE时序能告诉我们MBH和EMRI的什么信息?在本研究中,我们使用Kerr测地线的解析表达式来有效地求解次要目标的轨迹,并执行gpu加速的贝叶斯推理来评估QPE计时的信息内容。利用我们的推理框架,即QPE- fit (Fast inference with Timing; https://github.com/joheenc/QPE-FIT/tree/main),我们探索了QPE时间对天体物理参数的约束,如EMRI轨道参数和MBH质量/自旋。我们发现,在数十个轨道周期内,轻偏心率EMRI (e ~ 0.1 ~ 0.3)可以将MBH质量和EMRI半长轴/偏心率限制在10%的水平,而对于探测到的半长轴≥100Rg和监测基线(10-100)轨道,MBH自旋不受约束。引入不对准的进动盘通常会降低EMRI轨道参数的推断,但可以将盘的进动特性限制在10% ~ 50%。这项工作既强调了QPE观测作为星系核动态探测器的前景,也概述了在emri盘碰撞的多模态参数空间中这样做的挑战。
Prospects for EMRI/MBH Parameter Estimation Using Quasiperiodic Eruption Timings: Short-timescale Analysis
Quasiperiodic eruptions (QPEs) are luminous, recurring X-ray outbursts from galactic nuclei, with timescales of hours to days. While their origin remains uncertain, leading models invoke accretion disk instabilities or the interaction of a massive black hole (MBH) with a lower-mass secondary in an extreme mass ratio inspiral (EMRI). EMRI scenarios offer a robust framework for interpreting QPEs by characterizing observational signatures associated with the secondary’s orbital dynamics. This, in turn, enables extraction of the MBH/EMRI physical properties and provides a means to test the EMRI scenario, distinguishing models and addressing the question: what can QPE timings teach us about MBHs and EMRIs? In this study, we employ analytic expressions for Kerr geodesics to efficiently resolve the trajectory of the secondary object and perform GPU-accelerated Bayesian inference to assess the information content of QPE timings. Using our inference framework, referred to as QPE-FIT (Fast Inference with Timing; https://github.com/joheenc/QPE-FIT/tree/main), we explore QPE timing constraints on astrophysical parameters, such as EMRI orbital parameters and MBH mass/spin. We find that mild-eccentricity EMRIs (e ∼ 0.1–0.3) can constrain MBH mass and EMRI semimajor axis/eccentricity to the 10% level within tens of orbital periods, while MBH spin is unconstrained for the explored semimajor axes ≥100Rg and monitoring baselines (10–100) orbits. Introducing a misaligned precessing disk generally degrades inference of EMRI orbital parameters, but can constrain disk precession properties within 10%–50%. This work both highlights the prospect of QPE observations as dynamical probes of galactic nuclei and outlines the challenge of doing so in the multimodal parameter space of EMRI–disk collisions.