美国成年人生活基本8分与中风风险之间的关系

IF 0.7
Jiacong Tan, Huaxin Zhu, Yanyang Zeng, Meihua Li
{"title":"美国成年人生活基本8分与中风风险之间的关系","authors":"Jiacong Tan, Huaxin Zhu, Yanyang Zeng, Meihua Li","doi":"10.1177/15385744251387784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was designed to assess the correlation between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score and the risk of stroke in American adults using data from subjects of the NHANES.MethodsSubjects' data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2005 to 2020.The ..LE8 score integrates health behaviors as well as health factors. We employed weighted multivariate logistic regression models as well as propensity score matching methods to explore the relationship between these health behaviors, health factors, and LE8 scores and stroke risk. In addition, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) technique was used to examine possible nonlinear associations between these variables and stroke risk.ResultsA total of 31,653 subjects were included in this study, of whom 1187 (3.8%) had stroke. After considering all covariates, the results of weighted logistic regression modeling showed that subjects with intermediate cardiovascular health (CVH) levels had a significantly lower risk of stroke compared to subjects with low CVH levels(OR = 0.5,95%CI:0.41-0.61), while subjects with high CVH levels had a further reduced risk of stroke (OR = 0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.51). After propensity score matching, the results remain consistent with the above.RCS analysis showed a significant nonlinear correlation between LE8 score and stroke risk(<i>P</i> for nonlinear< 0.001). The results of the subgroup analyses were consistent across categories, indicating a significant negative association between LE8 and stroke.ConclusionAmong American adults, LE8 scores are negatively associated with stroke risk, which can be reduced through early screening and customized interventions for those with low CVH.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251387784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Life's Essential 8 Score and Stroke Risk in American Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Jiacong Tan, Huaxin Zhu, Yanyang Zeng, Meihua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744251387784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was designed to assess the correlation between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score and the risk of stroke in American adults using data from subjects of the NHANES.MethodsSubjects' data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2005 to 2020.The ..LE8 score integrates health behaviors as well as health factors. We employed weighted multivariate logistic regression models as well as propensity score matching methods to explore the relationship between these health behaviors, health factors, and LE8 scores and stroke risk. In addition, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) technique was used to examine possible nonlinear associations between these variables and stroke risk.ResultsA total of 31,653 subjects were included in this study, of whom 1187 (3.8%) had stroke. After considering all covariates, the results of weighted logistic regression modeling showed that subjects with intermediate cardiovascular health (CVH) levels had a significantly lower risk of stroke compared to subjects with low CVH levels(OR = 0.5,95%CI:0.41-0.61), while subjects with high CVH levels had a further reduced risk of stroke (OR = 0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.51). After propensity score matching, the results remain consistent with the above.RCS analysis showed a significant nonlinear correlation between LE8 score and stroke risk(<i>P</i> for nonlinear< 0.001). The results of the subgroup analyses were consistent across categories, indicating a significant negative association between LE8 and stroke.ConclusionAmong American adults, LE8 scores are negatively associated with stroke risk, which can be reduced through early screening and customized interventions for those with low CVH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15385744251387784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是利用NHANES受试者的数据,评估美国成年人生命基本8 (LE8)评分与中风风险之间的相关性。方法研究对象资料来源于2005 - 2020年全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库。. .LE8评分综合了健康行为和健康因素。我们采用加权多元逻辑回归模型和倾向评分匹配方法来探讨这些健康行为、健康因素和LE8评分与卒中风险之间的关系。此外,限制三次样条(RCS)技术用于检查这些变量与中风风险之间可能的非线性关联。结果共纳入31653例受试者,其中发生脑卒中1187例(3.8%)。在考虑所有协变量后,加权logistic回归模型的结果显示,与低CVH水平的受试者相比,中等心血管健康(CVH)水平的受试者卒中风险显著降低(OR = 0.5,95%CI:0.41-0.61),而高CVH水平的受试者卒中风险进一步降低(OR = 0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.51)。倾向得分匹配后,结果与上述一致。RCS分析显示LE8评分与卒中风险之间存在显著的非线性相关(P为非线性< 0.001)。亚组分析的结果在不同类别中是一致的,表明LE8与中风之间存在显著的负相关。结论在美国成年人中,LE8评分与卒中风险呈负相关,可通过对低CVH人群的早期筛查和个性化干预来降低卒中风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Life's Essential 8 Score and Stroke Risk in American Adults.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was designed to assess the correlation between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score and the risk of stroke in American adults using data from subjects of the NHANES.MethodsSubjects' data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2005 to 2020.The ..LE8 score integrates health behaviors as well as health factors. We employed weighted multivariate logistic regression models as well as propensity score matching methods to explore the relationship between these health behaviors, health factors, and LE8 scores and stroke risk. In addition, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) technique was used to examine possible nonlinear associations between these variables and stroke risk.ResultsA total of 31,653 subjects were included in this study, of whom 1187 (3.8%) had stroke. After considering all covariates, the results of weighted logistic regression modeling showed that subjects with intermediate cardiovascular health (CVH) levels had a significantly lower risk of stroke compared to subjects with low CVH levels(OR = 0.5,95%CI:0.41-0.61), while subjects with high CVH levels had a further reduced risk of stroke (OR = 0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.51). After propensity score matching, the results remain consistent with the above.RCS analysis showed a significant nonlinear correlation between LE8 score and stroke risk(P for nonlinear< 0.001). The results of the subgroup analyses were consistent across categories, indicating a significant negative association between LE8 and stroke.ConclusionAmong American adults, LE8 scores are negatively associated with stroke risk, which can be reduced through early screening and customized interventions for those with low CVH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信