哪些干预措施组合可以优化少女和年轻妇女的艾滋病毒预防?肯尼亚城市和农村参与DREAMS的队列分析。

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005272
Faith Magut, Sarah Mulwa, Annabelle Gourlay, Vivienne Kamire, Jane Osindo, Elvis O A Wambiya, Moses Otieno, Elona Toska, Jane Ferguson, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Daniel Kwaro, Abdhalah Ziraba, Isolde Birdthistle, Sian Floyd
{"title":"哪些干预措施组合可以优化少女和年轻妇女的艾滋病毒预防?肯尼亚城市和农村参与DREAMS的队列分析。","authors":"Faith Magut, Sarah Mulwa, Annabelle Gourlay, Vivienne Kamire, Jane Osindo, Elvis O A Wambiya, Moses Otieno, Elona Toska, Jane Ferguson, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Daniel Kwaro, Abdhalah Ziraba, Isolde Birdthistle, Sian Floyd","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive intervention packages are recommended to address multiple sources of HIV risk for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). DREAMS is a multi-component HIV prevention program designed to reduce HIV incidence among AGYW. We conducted a prospective cohort study among AGYW aged 13-22 years, randomly selected in rural Gem and urban Nairobi informal settlements followed from 2017/2018-2019. AGYW were classified into three groups: (1) invited to DREAMS and received a \"complete\" package, (2) invited and received a \"partial\" package, or (3) not invited to DREAMS. We defined the \"complete\" package as 4-5 primary interventions in Gem and 5 in Nairobi: the \"partial\" package as 3 specific interventions in Gem and any 3-4 interventions in Nairobi. We used propensity score-adjusted logistic regression to estimate the causal effect of DREAMS on outcomes under three counterfactual scenarios: all AGYW accessed the complete package, all accessed a partial package, or none were invited. In Nairobi, 1081 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 26% accessed the complete package and 32% accessed the partial package. Among those receiving the complete package, there was increase in HIV status knowledge(24.8% [95%CI:16.4,32.6]),social support(13.9% [95%CI:3.3,23.6]) and self-efficacy(10.3% [95%CI:0.5,20.4]) and a decrease in the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-8.0% [95%CI:-15.9,0.0]). In Gem, 1171 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 24% received the complete package and 21% received the partial package. We found evidence of an increase in HIV status knowledge(10.0% [95%CI:4.5,15.2]), social support(27.2% [95%CI:19.2,35.5]) and a decrease in condomless sex(-9.1% [95%CI:-13.6,-4.1]), and the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-7.6% [95%CI:-12.4,-2.2]) for the complete package. Among those receiving the partial package, there was a decrease in condomless sex(-12.2% [95%CI: -17.0,-6.4]), and an increase in self-efficacy(8.0% [95%CI:0.0,17]). A package of 4-5 primary DREAMS interventions had positive impacts on multiple HIV-related outcomes in both settings. A partial package was effective in Gem, but not in Nairobi, suggesting the need for context-specific intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0005272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What combination of interventions can optimise HIV prevention for adolescent girls and young women? Cohort analysis of DREAMS participation in urban and rural Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Faith Magut, Sarah Mulwa, Annabelle Gourlay, Vivienne Kamire, Jane Osindo, Elvis O A Wambiya, Moses Otieno, Elona Toska, Jane Ferguson, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Daniel Kwaro, Abdhalah Ziraba, Isolde Birdthistle, Sian Floyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Comprehensive intervention packages are recommended to address multiple sources of HIV risk for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). DREAMS is a multi-component HIV prevention program designed to reduce HIV incidence among AGYW. We conducted a prospective cohort study among AGYW aged 13-22 years, randomly selected in rural Gem and urban Nairobi informal settlements followed from 2017/2018-2019. AGYW were classified into three groups: (1) invited to DREAMS and received a \\\"complete\\\" package, (2) invited and received a \\\"partial\\\" package, or (3) not invited to DREAMS. We defined the \\\"complete\\\" package as 4-5 primary interventions in Gem and 5 in Nairobi: the \\\"partial\\\" package as 3 specific interventions in Gem and any 3-4 interventions in Nairobi. We used propensity score-adjusted logistic regression to estimate the causal effect of DREAMS on outcomes under three counterfactual scenarios: all AGYW accessed the complete package, all accessed a partial package, or none were invited. In Nairobi, 1081 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 26% accessed the complete package and 32% accessed the partial package. Among those receiving the complete package, there was increase in HIV status knowledge(24.8% [95%CI:16.4,32.6]),social support(13.9% [95%CI:3.3,23.6]) and self-efficacy(10.3% [95%CI:0.5,20.4]) and a decrease in the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-8.0% [95%CI:-15.9,0.0]). In Gem, 1171 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 24% received the complete package and 21% received the partial package. We found evidence of an increase in HIV status knowledge(10.0% [95%CI:4.5,15.2]), social support(27.2% [95%CI:19.2,35.5]) and a decrease in condomless sex(-9.1% [95%CI:-13.6,-4.1]), and the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-7.6% [95%CI:-12.4,-2.2]) for the complete package. Among those receiving the partial package, there was a decrease in condomless sex(-12.2% [95%CI: -17.0,-6.4]), and an increase in self-efficacy(8.0% [95%CI:0.0,17]). A package of 4-5 primary DREAMS interventions had positive impacts on multiple HIV-related outcomes in both settings. A partial package was effective in Gem, but not in Nairobi, suggesting the need for context-specific intervention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 10\",\"pages\":\"e0005272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议采取综合干预措施,以解决少女和年轻妇女(AGYW)的多重艾滋病毒风险来源。DREAMS是一个多部分艾滋病预防项目,旨在减少老年妇女的艾滋病发病率。我们在2017/2018-2019年期间对13-22岁的AGYW进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,随机选择了Gem农村和内罗毕城市非正式定居点的AGYW。AGYW被分为三组:(1)被邀请参加DREAMS并收到“完整”包,(2)被邀请并收到“部分”包,或(3)未被邀请参加DREAMS。我们将“完整”一揽子计划定义为Gem的4-5个主要干预措施和内罗毕的5个干预措施;“部分”一揽子计划定义为Gem的3个具体干预措施和内罗毕的任何3-4个干预措施。我们使用倾向得分调整的逻辑回归来估计梦对三种反事实情景下结果的因果影响:所有AGYW都访问了完整的包,所有AGYW都访问了部分包,或者没有被邀请。在内罗毕,1081名AGYW被录取。到2019年,26%访问完整包,32%访问部分包。在接受全套服务的人群中,艾滋病毒状况知识(24.8% [95%CI:16.4,32.6])、社会支持(13.9% [95%CI:3.3,23.6])和自我效能(10.3% [95%CI:0.5,20.4])有所增加,终生伴侣≥2名的比例有所下降(-8.0% [95%CI:-15.9,0.0])。在Gem, 1171名AGYW被纳入。到2019年,24%的人获得了完整的一揽子计划,21%的人获得了部分一揽子计划。我们发现证据表明,在完整的一揽子计划中,艾滋病毒状况知识(10.0% [95%CI:4.5,15.2])、社会支持(27.2% [95%CI:19.2,35.5])和无安全套性行为(-9.1% [95%CI:-13.6,-4.1])的增加,以及拥有≥2个终身伴侣的比例(-7.6% [95%CI:-12.4,-2.2])的减少。在接受部分包装的患者中,无安全套性行为减少(-12.2% [95%CI: -17.0,-6.4]),自我效能感增加(8.0% [95%CI:0.0,17])。在两种情况下,一揽子4-5项主要DREAMS干预措施对多种艾滋病毒相关结果产生了积极影响。部分一揽子计划在Gem有效,但在内罗毕无效,这表明需要针对具体情况的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What combination of interventions can optimise HIV prevention for adolescent girls and young women? Cohort analysis of DREAMS participation in urban and rural Kenya.

Comprehensive intervention packages are recommended to address multiple sources of HIV risk for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). DREAMS is a multi-component HIV prevention program designed to reduce HIV incidence among AGYW. We conducted a prospective cohort study among AGYW aged 13-22 years, randomly selected in rural Gem and urban Nairobi informal settlements followed from 2017/2018-2019. AGYW were classified into three groups: (1) invited to DREAMS and received a "complete" package, (2) invited and received a "partial" package, or (3) not invited to DREAMS. We defined the "complete" package as 4-5 primary interventions in Gem and 5 in Nairobi: the "partial" package as 3 specific interventions in Gem and any 3-4 interventions in Nairobi. We used propensity score-adjusted logistic regression to estimate the causal effect of DREAMS on outcomes under three counterfactual scenarios: all AGYW accessed the complete package, all accessed a partial package, or none were invited. In Nairobi, 1081 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 26% accessed the complete package and 32% accessed the partial package. Among those receiving the complete package, there was increase in HIV status knowledge(24.8% [95%CI:16.4,32.6]),social support(13.9% [95%CI:3.3,23.6]) and self-efficacy(10.3% [95%CI:0.5,20.4]) and a decrease in the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-8.0% [95%CI:-15.9,0.0]). In Gem, 1171 AGYW were enrolled. By 2019, 24% received the complete package and 21% received the partial package. We found evidence of an increase in HIV status knowledge(10.0% [95%CI:4.5,15.2]), social support(27.2% [95%CI:19.2,35.5]) and a decrease in condomless sex(-9.1% [95%CI:-13.6,-4.1]), and the proportion with ≥2 lifetime partners(-7.6% [95%CI:-12.4,-2.2]) for the complete package. Among those receiving the partial package, there was a decrease in condomless sex(-12.2% [95%CI: -17.0,-6.4]), and an increase in self-efficacy(8.0% [95%CI:0.0,17]). A package of 4-5 primary DREAMS interventions had positive impacts on multiple HIV-related outcomes in both settings. A partial package was effective in Gem, but not in Nairobi, suggesting the need for context-specific intervention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信