特朗普时代的科学与公共卫生:证据和制度的瓦解以及重建的建议。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sam Halabi, Lawrence O Gostin, Kayla Wontumi, John Kraemer, Anjola Tega
{"title":"特朗普时代的科学与公共卫生:证据和制度的瓦解以及重建的建议。","authors":"Sam Halabi, Lawrence O Gostin, Kayla Wontumi, John Kraemer, Anjola Tega","doi":"10.1215/03616878-12262640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This contribution to the special issue addresses the unprecedented politicization of science and health institutions, which threatens the functional integrity of democratic governance itself. Regulatory measures have weakened the infrastructure for evidence generation, constrained the autonomy of scientific actors, and subordinated public health priorities to cultural grievance and political loyalty. False and misleading information about core scientific knowledge is amplified not only in social media but by government itself. NIH disinvestment, advisory body sidelining, and public rhetoric casting science as elite overreach have together eroded the credibility of United States health leadership both domestically and abroad. The targeting of DEI policies in research portfolios, moreover, jeopardizes not only representational justice but the innovation capacity of American science at large. In this contribution, we trace the historical and political structure of science-politics confrontations and detail the damage to the public health and research ecosystem. We offer proposals to reconstruct the scientific enterprise in the next presidential administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science and Public Health in the Trump Era: The Dismantling of Evidence and Institutions and Proposals for Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Halabi, Lawrence O Gostin, Kayla Wontumi, John Kraemer, Anjola Tega\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-12262640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This contribution to the special issue addresses the unprecedented politicization of science and health institutions, which threatens the functional integrity of democratic governance itself. Regulatory measures have weakened the infrastructure for evidence generation, constrained the autonomy of scientific actors, and subordinated public health priorities to cultural grievance and political loyalty. False and misleading information about core scientific knowledge is amplified not only in social media but by government itself. NIH disinvestment, advisory body sidelining, and public rhetoric casting science as elite overreach have together eroded the credibility of United States health leadership both domestically and abroad. The targeting of DEI policies in research portfolios, moreover, jeopardizes not only representational justice but the innovation capacity of American science at large. In this contribution, we trace the historical and political structure of science-politics confrontations and detail the damage to the public health and research ecosystem. We offer proposals to reconstruct the scientific enterprise in the next presidential administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12262640\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12262640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇特刊的投稿论述了科学和卫生机构前所未有的政治化,这种政治化威胁到民主治理本身的职能完整性。监管措施削弱了证据生成的基础设施,限制了科学行为者的自主权,并使公共卫生优先事项服从于文化不满和政治忠诚。关于核心科学知识的虚假和误导性信息不仅在社交媒体上被放大,而且被政府本身放大。美国国立卫生研究院的撤资,咨询机构的边缘化,以及将科学视为精英越权的公共言论,共同侵蚀了美国在国内外卫生领导地位的可信度。此外,在研究组合中以DEI政策为目标不仅会损害代表性的公正,还会损害美国科学界的整体创新能力。在这篇文章中,我们追溯了科学-政治对抗的历史和政治结构,并详细说明了对公共卫生和研究生态系统的损害。我们提出了在下届总统任期内重建科学事业的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science and Public Health in the Trump Era: The Dismantling of Evidence and Institutions and Proposals for Reconstruction.

This contribution to the special issue addresses the unprecedented politicization of science and health institutions, which threatens the functional integrity of democratic governance itself. Regulatory measures have weakened the infrastructure for evidence generation, constrained the autonomy of scientific actors, and subordinated public health priorities to cultural grievance and political loyalty. False and misleading information about core scientific knowledge is amplified not only in social media but by government itself. NIH disinvestment, advisory body sidelining, and public rhetoric casting science as elite overreach have together eroded the credibility of United States health leadership both domestically and abroad. The targeting of DEI policies in research portfolios, moreover, jeopardizes not only representational justice but the innovation capacity of American science at large. In this contribution, we trace the historical and political structure of science-politics confrontations and detail the damage to the public health and research ecosystem. We offer proposals to reconstruct the scientific enterprise in the next presidential administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信