遭受攻击的公共卫生:连续性、非连续性和历史。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Merlin Chowkwanyun
{"title":"遭受攻击的公共卫生:连续性、非连续性和历史。","authors":"Merlin Chowkwanyun","doi":"10.1215/03616878-12262696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How unprecedented is the current backlash against the public health enterprise? In this article, I explore prior attacks against public health practice in three exemplary domains: mass vaccination programs; air pollution control; and occupational safety. In all three domains, I argue that public health has been remarkably durable throughout the 20th century, and that most controversies over its powers - or even direct onslaughts from hostile elected officials - have failed to overturn long-standing practices or institutions, even if implementation may be altered for the worse. Once public health traditions - and the infrastructure that erects them - become entrenched, they have remained difficult to fully eliminate. There are signs, however, that the second Trump Administration's onslaught is different, both in the ferocity and velocity of its actions, and in a new 21st-century context that it inhabits, with different legal precedents, cultural beliefs, communication practices, and political norms. Throughout, I also identify historical seeds of its current path in the late-20thand early-21st century.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Health Under Attack: Continuity, Discontinuity, and History.\",\"authors\":\"Merlin Chowkwanyun\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-12262696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How unprecedented is the current backlash against the public health enterprise? In this article, I explore prior attacks against public health practice in three exemplary domains: mass vaccination programs; air pollution control; and occupational safety. In all three domains, I argue that public health has been remarkably durable throughout the 20th century, and that most controversies over its powers - or even direct onslaughts from hostile elected officials - have failed to overturn long-standing practices or institutions, even if implementation may be altered for the worse. Once public health traditions - and the infrastructure that erects them - become entrenched, they have remained difficult to fully eliminate. There are signs, however, that the second Trump Administration's onslaught is different, both in the ferocity and velocity of its actions, and in a new 21st-century context that it inhabits, with different legal precedents, cultural beliefs, communication practices, and political norms. Throughout, I also identify historical seeds of its current path in the late-20thand early-21st century.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12262696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12262696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前对公共卫生事业的强烈反对是多么前所未有?在这篇文章中,我在三个典型领域探讨了先前针对公共卫生实践的攻击:大规模疫苗接种计划;空气污染控制;还有职业安全。在所有这三个领域,我认为公共卫生在整个20世纪都非常持久,而且大多数关于其权力的争议——甚至是来自敌对的民选官员的直接攻击——都未能推翻长期存在的做法或制度,即使实施可能会变得更糟。一旦公共卫生传统——以及支撑这些传统的基础设施——变得根深蒂固,就很难完全消除。然而,有迹象表明,特朗普第二届政府的攻击是不同的,无论是在其行动的凶猛和速度方面,还是在它所处的21世纪的新背景下,都有不同的法律先例、文化信仰、沟通实践和政治规范。在整个过程中,我还发现了20世纪末和21世纪初其当前路径的历史种子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Health Under Attack: Continuity, Discontinuity, and History.

How unprecedented is the current backlash against the public health enterprise? In this article, I explore prior attacks against public health practice in three exemplary domains: mass vaccination programs; air pollution control; and occupational safety. In all three domains, I argue that public health has been remarkably durable throughout the 20th century, and that most controversies over its powers - or even direct onslaughts from hostile elected officials - have failed to overturn long-standing practices or institutions, even if implementation may be altered for the worse. Once public health traditions - and the infrastructure that erects them - become entrenched, they have remained difficult to fully eliminate. There are signs, however, that the second Trump Administration's onslaught is different, both in the ferocity and velocity of its actions, and in a new 21st-century context that it inhabits, with different legal precedents, cultural beliefs, communication practices, and political norms. Throughout, I also identify historical seeds of its current path in the late-20thand early-21st century.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信