来自ACAAI IEI调查的经验教训:为执业过敏症专家-免疫学家推进诊断和治疗策略。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Barbara Ariue, Niraj C Patel, Joseph A Bellanti
{"title":"来自ACAAI IEI调查的经验教训:为执业过敏症专家-免疫学家推进诊断和治疗策略。","authors":"Barbara Ariue, Niraj C Patel, Joseph A Bellanti","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have been increasingly well characterized on the molecular and genetic levels. Their clinical recognition and management among practicing allergist-immunologists remain challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the consultative practices of allergist-immunologists in diagnosing and managing IEIs by identifying subtypes encountered, current approaches, multidisciplinary collaboration, barriers, and educational needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology distributed a 30-question web-based survey assessing IEI experience via SurveyMonkey to U.S.-based members over a four-week period during the spring of 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most IEI consultations originated from outpatient primary care settings (82%), with 56% of respondents providing both outpatient and inpatient consultations. Frequently encountered IEIs included common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) (100%), specific antibody deficiency (99%), selective IgA deficiency (97%), and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (90%). Less frequently encountered were Chediak-Higashi syndrome (40.5%) and type I interferonopathies (41%). The greatest need for subspecialty input was from hematology/oncology for quantitative phagocyte cell defects (89%) and ALPS-FAS (74%). Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and defects of cytotoxicity (50%) most often required expert immunology consultation. The top educational priorities were genetic testing (61%) and gene therapy (60%). The major barriers were complexity and wide range of IEIs (39%) and low referral volume (36%). Comfort levels and need for knowledge varied significantly by practice type and clinician age. A major limitation of this study was the over representation of academic practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This ACAAI study provides insight into the current consultative practices and management of allergist-immunologists engaging in IEI care. These findings highlight the critical need for enhanced training, improved access to multidisciplinary support, and targeted continuing education to optimize care for patients with these complex disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from the ACAAI IEI Survey: Advancing Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for the Practicing Allergist-Immunologist.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Ariue, Niraj C Patel, Joseph A Bellanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have been increasingly well characterized on the molecular and genetic levels. Their clinical recognition and management among practicing allergist-immunologists remain challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the consultative practices of allergist-immunologists in diagnosing and managing IEIs by identifying subtypes encountered, current approaches, multidisciplinary collaboration, barriers, and educational needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology distributed a 30-question web-based survey assessing IEI experience via SurveyMonkey to U.S.-based members over a four-week period during the spring of 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most IEI consultations originated from outpatient primary care settings (82%), with 56% of respondents providing both outpatient and inpatient consultations. Frequently encountered IEIs included common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) (100%), specific antibody deficiency (99%), selective IgA deficiency (97%), and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (90%). Less frequently encountered were Chediak-Higashi syndrome (40.5%) and type I interferonopathies (41%). The greatest need for subspecialty input was from hematology/oncology for quantitative phagocyte cell defects (89%) and ALPS-FAS (74%). Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and defects of cytotoxicity (50%) most often required expert immunology consultation. The top educational priorities were genetic testing (61%) and gene therapy (60%). The major barriers were complexity and wide range of IEIs (39%) and low referral volume (36%). Comfort levels and need for knowledge varied significantly by practice type and clinician age. A major limitation of this study was the over representation of academic practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This ACAAI study provides insight into the current consultative practices and management of allergist-immunologists engaging in IEI care. These findings highlight the critical need for enhanced training, improved access to multidisciplinary support, and targeted continuing education to optimize care for patients with these complex disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先天性免疫错误(IEI)在分子和遗传水平上的特征越来越明显。他们的临床识别和管理执业过敏症-免疫学家仍然具有挑战性。目的:通过识别遇到的亚型、目前的方法、多学科合作、障碍和教育需求,评估过敏科-免疫学家在诊断和管理iei方面的咨询实践。方法:美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学学院在2024年春季的四周时间里,通过SurveyMonkey向美国会员分发了一份30个问题的网络调查,评估IEI的体验。结果:大多数IEI咨询来自门诊初级保健机构(82%),56%的受访者同时提供门诊和住院咨询。常见的iei包括常见可变免疫缺陷(CVID)(100%)、特异性抗体缺乏症(99%)、选择性IgA缺乏症(97%)和C1酯酶抑制剂缺乏症(90%)。较少出现的是Chediak-Higashi综合征(40.5%)和I型干扰素病变(41%)。对亚专科输入需求最大的是血液学/肿瘤学的定量吞噬细胞缺陷(89%)和ALPS-FAS(74%)。严重的联合免疫缺陷(SCID)和细胞毒性缺陷(50%)最常需要专家免疫学咨询。最受教育的是基因检测(61%)和基因治疗(60%)。主要障碍是iei的复杂性和范围广(39%)和转诊量低(36%)。舒适程度和知识需求因实践类型和临床医生年龄的不同而有显著差异。本研究的一个主要限制是学术实践者的过度代表性。结论:这项ACAAI研究为目前从事IEI护理的过敏症-免疫学家的咨询实践和管理提供了见解。这些发现强调了加强培训、改善获得多学科支持的机会和有针对性的继续教育的迫切需要,以优化对这些复杂疾病患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons from the ACAAI IEI Survey: Advancing Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for the Practicing Allergist-Immunologist.

Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have been increasingly well characterized on the molecular and genetic levels. Their clinical recognition and management among practicing allergist-immunologists remain challenging.

Objective: To evaluate the consultative practices of allergist-immunologists in diagnosing and managing IEIs by identifying subtypes encountered, current approaches, multidisciplinary collaboration, barriers, and educational needs.

Methods: The American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology distributed a 30-question web-based survey assessing IEI experience via SurveyMonkey to U.S.-based members over a four-week period during the spring of 2024.

Results: Most IEI consultations originated from outpatient primary care settings (82%), with 56% of respondents providing both outpatient and inpatient consultations. Frequently encountered IEIs included common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) (100%), specific antibody deficiency (99%), selective IgA deficiency (97%), and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (90%). Less frequently encountered were Chediak-Higashi syndrome (40.5%) and type I interferonopathies (41%). The greatest need for subspecialty input was from hematology/oncology for quantitative phagocyte cell defects (89%) and ALPS-FAS (74%). Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and defects of cytotoxicity (50%) most often required expert immunology consultation. The top educational priorities were genetic testing (61%) and gene therapy (60%). The major barriers were complexity and wide range of IEIs (39%) and low referral volume (36%). Comfort levels and need for knowledge varied significantly by practice type and clinician age. A major limitation of this study was the over representation of academic practitioners.

Conclusion: This ACAAI study provides insight into the current consultative practices and management of allergist-immunologists engaging in IEI care. These findings highlight the critical need for enhanced training, improved access to multidisciplinary support, and targeted continuing education to optimize care for patients with these complex disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信