护生能力与感知导师评估素养:自我效能感与性别偏见的中介作用。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yazhou Zhu, Jinxin Zhu
{"title":"护生能力与感知导师评估素养:自我效能感与性别偏见的中介作用。","authors":"Yazhou Zhu, Jinxin Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03862-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentors play a crucial role in clinical nursing education, particularly in assessing student nurses. However, if students cannot perceive their mentors' assessment-literate practices (referred to as mentors' assessment-literate practices hereafter), students may not effectively utilize assessment information for learning. Despite its significance, mentors' assessment-literate practices and the antecedent factors are not well studied. This study aims to explore the mediating role of nursing students' self-efficacy in the relationship between their competence and their perception of mentors' assessment-literate practices, while also examining potential gender bias in mentors' assessment-literate practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a cross-sectional quantitative design. Participants included 854 final-year nursing students (61 males, 793 females) from 10 colleges/universities in southern China. After eight months of clinical training, students reported on mentors' assessment-literate practices, self-efficacy, internship grades, and gender. Path analysis was conducted using Mplus 8.10 to test the mediating model, and gender bias was assessed through differential item functioning analysis with Winsteps<sup>®</sup> (Version 5.6.0.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a full mediation effect of self-efficacy between competence and students' perception of their mentors' assessment-literate practices, with a statistically significant indirect association of 0.10. The path coefficient between competence and self-efficacy is 0.12, and between self-efficacy and perceived mentors' assessment-literate practices is 0.86. Gender bias and gender difference were statistically not supported; however, three items showed large effect size regarding gender bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study introduces assessment-literate practices as a key concept in nursing education, highlighting its antecedent factors and potential gender biases for better assessment practices. The findings suggest that self-efficacy plays a full mediating role; hence, stakeholders should prioritize developing students' self-efficacy while improving their competence. Also, mentorship practices should be adjusted to ensure equal opportunities for both male and female students; specifically, they may need to be aware of potential gender bias, offering male students more practice opportunities and female students more chances to explain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing students' competence and perceived mentor assessment literacy: the mediating role of self-efficacy and gender bias.\",\"authors\":\"Yazhou Zhu, Jinxin Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03862-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentors play a crucial role in clinical nursing education, particularly in assessing student nurses. However, if students cannot perceive their mentors' assessment-literate practices (referred to as mentors' assessment-literate practices hereafter), students may not effectively utilize assessment information for learning. Despite its significance, mentors' assessment-literate practices and the antecedent factors are not well studied. This study aims to explore the mediating role of nursing students' self-efficacy in the relationship between their competence and their perception of mentors' assessment-literate practices, while also examining potential gender bias in mentors' assessment-literate practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a cross-sectional quantitative design. Participants included 854 final-year nursing students (61 males, 793 females) from 10 colleges/universities in southern China. After eight months of clinical training, students reported on mentors' assessment-literate practices, self-efficacy, internship grades, and gender. Path analysis was conducted using Mplus 8.10 to test the mediating model, and gender bias was assessed through differential item functioning analysis with Winsteps<sup>®</sup> (Version 5.6.0.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a full mediation effect of self-efficacy between competence and students' perception of their mentors' assessment-literate practices, with a statistically significant indirect association of 0.10. The path coefficient between competence and self-efficacy is 0.12, and between self-efficacy and perceived mentors' assessment-literate practices is 0.86. Gender bias and gender difference were statistically not supported; however, three items showed large effect size regarding gender bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study introduces assessment-literate practices as a key concept in nursing education, highlighting its antecedent factors and potential gender biases for better assessment practices. The findings suggest that self-efficacy plays a full mediating role; hence, stakeholders should prioritize developing students' self-efficacy while improving their competence. Also, mentorship practices should be adjusted to ensure equal opportunities for both male and female students; specifically, they may need to be aware of potential gender bias, offering male students more practice opportunities and female students more chances to explain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03862-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03862-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:导师在临床护理教育中发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在评估学生护士方面。然而,如果学生不能感知导师的评估识字实践(以下简称导师的评估识字实践),学生可能无法有效地利用评估信息进行学习。尽管具有重要意义,但导师的评估素养实践及其前因性尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨护生自我效能感在护生胜任力与导师评鉴实践知觉之间的中介作用,并检视导师评鉴实践中潜在的性别偏见。方法:采用横断面定量设计。参与者包括来自中国南方10所高校的854名大四护理专业学生(男61名,女793名)。经过八个月的临床培训,学生们报告了导师的评估-识字实践,自我效能,实习成绩和性别。采用Mplus 8.10进行通径分析,对中介模型进行检验;采用Winsteps®(Version 5.6.0.0)进行差异项目功能分析,评估性别偏倚。结果:本研究发现自我效能在能力与学生对导师评鉴实践的感知之间存在完全中介效应,间接相关系数为0.10。胜任力与自我效能感之间的路径系数为0.12,自我效能感与感知导师的评估素养实践之间的路径系数为0.86。性别偏见和性别差异在统计上不被支持;然而,三个项目在性别偏见方面表现出较大的效应量。结论:本研究将评估文化实践作为护理教育的关键概念,强调其前因性和潜在的性别偏见,以促进评估实践的发展。研究结果表明,自我效能感在学业成绩中起完全的中介作用;因此,利益相关者应该在提高学生能力的同时,优先发展学生的自我效能感。此外,应调整指导实践,以确保男女学生的机会平等;具体来说,他们可能需要意识到潜在的性别偏见,为男学生提供更多的实践机会,为女学生提供更多的解释机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nursing students' competence and perceived mentor assessment literacy: the mediating role of self-efficacy and gender bias.

Nursing students' competence and perceived mentor assessment literacy: the mediating role of self-efficacy and gender bias.

Nursing students' competence and perceived mentor assessment literacy: the mediating role of self-efficacy and gender bias.

Background: Mentors play a crucial role in clinical nursing education, particularly in assessing student nurses. However, if students cannot perceive their mentors' assessment-literate practices (referred to as mentors' assessment-literate practices hereafter), students may not effectively utilize assessment information for learning. Despite its significance, mentors' assessment-literate practices and the antecedent factors are not well studied. This study aims to explore the mediating role of nursing students' self-efficacy in the relationship between their competence and their perception of mentors' assessment-literate practices, while also examining potential gender bias in mentors' assessment-literate practices.

Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional quantitative design. Participants included 854 final-year nursing students (61 males, 793 females) from 10 colleges/universities in southern China. After eight months of clinical training, students reported on mentors' assessment-literate practices, self-efficacy, internship grades, and gender. Path analysis was conducted using Mplus 8.10 to test the mediating model, and gender bias was assessed through differential item functioning analysis with Winsteps® (Version 5.6.0.0).

Results: The study found a full mediation effect of self-efficacy between competence and students' perception of their mentors' assessment-literate practices, with a statistically significant indirect association of 0.10. The path coefficient between competence and self-efficacy is 0.12, and between self-efficacy and perceived mentors' assessment-literate practices is 0.86. Gender bias and gender difference were statistically not supported; however, three items showed large effect size regarding gender bias.

Conclusions: This study introduces assessment-literate practices as a key concept in nursing education, highlighting its antecedent factors and potential gender biases for better assessment practices. The findings suggest that self-efficacy plays a full mediating role; hence, stakeholders should prioritize developing students' self-efficacy while improving their competence. Also, mentorship practices should be adjusted to ensure equal opportunities for both male and female students; specifically, they may need to be aware of potential gender bias, offering male students more practice opportunities and female students more chances to explain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信