如何使用课程映射来确保两所医科大学基于能力的医学课程中连贯和协调的学习螺旋。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tuija Eeva Elisabeth Waldvogel, Monika Link, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Jacqueline Jennebach, Jörg Goldhahn, Olaf Ahlers
{"title":"如何使用课程映射来确保两所医科大学基于能力的医学课程中连贯和协调的学习螺旋。","authors":"Tuija Eeva Elisabeth Waldvogel, Monika Link, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Jacqueline Jennebach, Jörg Goldhahn, Olaf Ahlers","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07837-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of competency-based medical curricula is still a challenge. Curriculum mapping comprises all learning objectives for the learning events which are (usually) mapped to a national framework. This study evaluates coherence within the learning spiral across two consecutive competency-based curricula by usage of curricular maps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Curriculum mapping data of two undergraduate medical curricula (Bachelor and consecutive Master) from two different Swiss universities was used to evaluate a given topic (in our case cardiology) related to continuity and increasing complexity. In addition, coverage of the Swiss national framework ('PROFILES') was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A continuous exposure to cardiovascular content across the two programs as well as an increasing complexity was found. The analysis further showed that most parts of the national Swiss framework ('PROFILES') are covered to some extent and revealed missing coverage of some parts of the first chapter ('General Objectives') and second chapter ('Entrustable Professional activities').</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the implicit notion that the medical curriculum across two universities can be coherent and provide the necessary structure to enable a coordinated learning spiral. The approach can be used for any curriculum which has been mapped to a framework to evaluate the coherence and coordination of a learning spiral in each field. This approach can be very valuable especially for medical programs where students change from one institution to another.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to use curriculum mapping to ensure a coherent and coordinated learning spiral in a competency-based medical curriculum across two medical universities.\",\"authors\":\"Tuija Eeva Elisabeth Waldvogel, Monika Link, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Jacqueline Jennebach, Jörg Goldhahn, Olaf Ahlers\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07837-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of competency-based medical curricula is still a challenge. Curriculum mapping comprises all learning objectives for the learning events which are (usually) mapped to a national framework. This study evaluates coherence within the learning spiral across two consecutive competency-based curricula by usage of curricular maps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Curriculum mapping data of two undergraduate medical curricula (Bachelor and consecutive Master) from two different Swiss universities was used to evaluate a given topic (in our case cardiology) related to continuity and increasing complexity. In addition, coverage of the Swiss national framework ('PROFILES') was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A continuous exposure to cardiovascular content across the two programs as well as an increasing complexity was found. The analysis further showed that most parts of the national Swiss framework ('PROFILES') are covered to some extent and revealed missing coverage of some parts of the first chapter ('General Objectives') and second chapter ('Entrustable Professional activities').</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the implicit notion that the medical curriculum across two universities can be coherent and provide the necessary structure to enable a coordinated learning spiral. The approach can be used for any curriculum which has been mapped to a framework to evaluate the coherence and coordination of a learning spiral in each field. This approach can be very valuable especially for medical programs where students change from one institution to another.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502588/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07837-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07837-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于能力的医学课程评价仍然是一个挑战。课程映射包括学习活动的所有学习目标,这些目标(通常)映射到国家框架中。本研究通过使用课程地图来评估在两个连续的以能力为基础的课程中学习螺旋中的一致性。方法:使用来自瑞士两所不同大学的两个本科医学课程(学士和连续的硕士)的课程映射数据来评估给定主题(在我们的案例中是心脏病学)与连续性和日益增加的复杂性相关。此外,还评估了瑞士国家框架(“概况”)的覆盖范围。结果:发现两个项目中心血管内容的持续暴露以及复杂性的增加。分析进一步表明,瑞士国家框架(“概况”)的大部分内容在一定程度上得到了覆盖,并且发现第一章(“一般目标”)和第二章(“可信赖的专业活动”)的某些部分缺少覆盖。结论:研究结果支持了两所大学的医学课程可以连贯的隐含概念,并提供了必要的结构,以实现协调的学习螺旋。这种方法可用于任何课程,只要这些课程已被纳入一个框架,以评估每个领域学习螺旋的连贯性和协调性。这种方法非常有价值,特别是对于学生从一个机构转到另一个机构的医学项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How to use curriculum mapping to ensure a coherent and coordinated learning spiral in a competency-based medical curriculum across two medical universities.

How to use curriculum mapping to ensure a coherent and coordinated learning spiral in a competency-based medical curriculum across two medical universities.

How to use curriculum mapping to ensure a coherent and coordinated learning spiral in a competency-based medical curriculum across two medical universities.

How to use curriculum mapping to ensure a coherent and coordinated learning spiral in a competency-based medical curriculum across two medical universities.

Background: Evaluation of competency-based medical curricula is still a challenge. Curriculum mapping comprises all learning objectives for the learning events which are (usually) mapped to a national framework. This study evaluates coherence within the learning spiral across two consecutive competency-based curricula by usage of curricular maps.

Methods: Curriculum mapping data of two undergraduate medical curricula (Bachelor and consecutive Master) from two different Swiss universities was used to evaluate a given topic (in our case cardiology) related to continuity and increasing complexity. In addition, coverage of the Swiss national framework ('PROFILES') was assessed.

Results: A continuous exposure to cardiovascular content across the two programs as well as an increasing complexity was found. The analysis further showed that most parts of the national Swiss framework ('PROFILES') are covered to some extent and revealed missing coverage of some parts of the first chapter ('General Objectives') and second chapter ('Entrustable Professional activities').

Conclusion: The results support the implicit notion that the medical curriculum across two universities can be coherent and provide the necessary structure to enable a coordinated learning spiral. The approach can be used for any curriculum which has been mapped to a framework to evaluate the coherence and coordination of a learning spiral in each field. This approach can be very valuable especially for medical programs where students change from one institution to another.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信