澳大利亚医院的协作药剂师处方模式:一项范围研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hana Amer, Sally Marotti, Imaina Widagdo, Sharon Goldsworthy, Jacinta Johnson, Lisa Kalisch Ellett
{"title":"澳大利亚医院的协作药剂师处方模式:一项范围研究。","authors":"Hana Amer, Sally Marotti, Imaina Widagdo, Sharon Goldsworthy, Jacinta Johnson, Lisa Kalisch Ellett","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative pharmacist prescribing models have been trialled and implemented in Australian hospitals and involve credentialed pharmacists working with doctors and patients to develop patient medicine plans and prescribe medicines.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures in Australian hospitals and provide a narrative summary of the models and associated training.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping study was conducted using an exploratory and descriptive approach to identify and map pharmacist prescribing models implemented in Australian hospitals, and their associated training. Hospital pharmacy directors in Australia were contacted through a hospital pharmacy professional organisation in November 2023 and were asked to provide their pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures. Details of the models and training programs were extracted and summarised, with similarities and differences narratively reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen different collaborative pharmacist prescribing models were reported to be implemented across more than 35 hospitals. Fourteen models had a formal training program. The models varied in scope of practice, particularly relating to medicine initiation and the timing of prescribing. The training and maintenance of currency of practice differed between models. Only three models recognised credentialing from other hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals variation in scope of practice, training, and credentialing processes between pharmacist prescribing models, with limited recognition and transferability of prescribing skills across jurisdictions in Australia. Efforts to establish national accreditation standards for pharmacist prescriber education programs and the recent introduction of a national credentialing program, could pave the way for the standardisation of the models and training within Australian hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative pharmacist prescribing models in Australian hospitals: a scoping study.\",\"authors\":\"Hana Amer, Sally Marotti, Imaina Widagdo, Sharon Goldsworthy, Jacinta Johnson, Lisa Kalisch Ellett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative pharmacist prescribing models have been trialled and implemented in Australian hospitals and involve credentialed pharmacists working with doctors and patients to develop patient medicine plans and prescribe medicines.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures in Australian hospitals and provide a narrative summary of the models and associated training.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping study was conducted using an exploratory and descriptive approach to identify and map pharmacist prescribing models implemented in Australian hospitals, and their associated training. Hospital pharmacy directors in Australia were contacted through a hospital pharmacy professional organisation in November 2023 and were asked to provide their pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures. Details of the models and training programs were extracted and summarised, with similarities and differences narratively reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen different collaborative pharmacist prescribing models were reported to be implemented across more than 35 hospitals. Fourteen models had a formal training program. The models varied in scope of practice, particularly relating to medicine initiation and the timing of prescribing. The training and maintenance of currency of practice differed between models. Only three models recognised credentialing from other hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals variation in scope of practice, training, and credentialing processes between pharmacist prescribing models, with limited recognition and transferability of prescribing skills across jurisdictions in Australia. Efforts to establish national accreditation standards for pharmacist prescriber education programs and the recent introduction of a national credentialing program, could pave the way for the standardisation of the models and training within Australian hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:协作药剂师处方模式已在澳大利亚医院试行和实施,涉及有资格的药剂师与医生和患者合作制定患者用药计划和开药。目的:本研究旨在确定澳大利亚医院的药剂师处方政策和程序,并提供模型和相关培训的叙述性总结。方法:采用探索性和描述性方法进行范围研究,以确定和绘制澳大利亚医院实施的药剂师处方模型及其相关培训。2023年11月,通过一家医院药房专业组织联系了澳大利亚的医院药房主任,并要求他们提供药剂师开处方的政策和程序。对模型和训练方案的细节进行了提取和总结,并叙述了异同。结果:据报道,在超过35家医院实施了15种不同的协作药剂师处方模式。14名模特接受了正式的培训。这些模式在实践范围上各不相同,特别是与药物起始和处方时间有关。不同的模型对实践货币的培训和维护是不同的。只有三个模型承认其他医院的证书。结论:该研究揭示了药剂师处方模式之间的实践范围、培训和资格认证过程的差异,以及澳大利亚各司法管辖区对处方技能的有限认可和可转移性。为药剂师开处方者教育项目建立国家认证标准的努力,以及最近引入的国家资格认证项目,可以为澳大利亚医院内模式和培训的标准化铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative pharmacist prescribing models in Australian hospitals: a scoping study.

Background: Collaborative pharmacist prescribing models have been trialled and implemented in Australian hospitals and involve credentialed pharmacists working with doctors and patients to develop patient medicine plans and prescribe medicines.

Aim: This study aimed to identify pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures in Australian hospitals and provide a narrative summary of the models and associated training.

Method: A scoping study was conducted using an exploratory and descriptive approach to identify and map pharmacist prescribing models implemented in Australian hospitals, and their associated training. Hospital pharmacy directors in Australia were contacted through a hospital pharmacy professional organisation in November 2023 and were asked to provide their pharmacist prescribing policies and procedures. Details of the models and training programs were extracted and summarised, with similarities and differences narratively reported.

Results: Fifteen different collaborative pharmacist prescribing models were reported to be implemented across more than 35 hospitals. Fourteen models had a formal training program. The models varied in scope of practice, particularly relating to medicine initiation and the timing of prescribing. The training and maintenance of currency of practice differed between models. Only three models recognised credentialing from other hospitals.

Conclusion: The study reveals variation in scope of practice, training, and credentialing processes between pharmacist prescribing models, with limited recognition and transferability of prescribing skills across jurisdictions in Australia. Efforts to establish national accreditation standards for pharmacist prescriber education programs and the recent introduction of a national credentialing program, could pave the way for the standardisation of the models and training within Australian hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信