密歇根神经病变筛查仪器评分与足底感觉神经传导研究在糖尿病神经病变中的比较。

IF 0.8
Saba Zaidi, Almas Zafar
{"title":"密歇根神经病变筛查仪器评分与足底感觉神经传导研究在糖尿病神经病变中的比较。","authors":"Saba Zaidi, Almas Zafar","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.10.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score and plantar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) in diabetic patients with neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from March to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Using a non-probability purposive sampling technique, patients aged between 16 and 65 years with diabetic polyneuropathy and age-method healthy controls were included in the study. Neuropathy was graded based on MNSI score. Sural and plantar NCS were performed using the standard and modified Ponsford techniques, respectively. All evaluations were performed using a Nihon Kohden electromyography system to ensure reliable results. Data were collected using a well-designed questionnaire administered by neurology trainees and later analysed by SPSS version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 participants, comprising 53 diabetic patients (33 MNSI-positive, 20 MNSI-negative) and 25 age-matched healthy controls, were analysed. MNSI-positive patients had significantly higher HbA1c and fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels compared to MNSI-negative patients with p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively. The sural nerve conduction abnormalities were found in 39.7% participants, while 51.3% participants showed plantar nerve conduction abnormalities. There was a notable association between higher MNSI score and abnormal plantar NCS (p = 0.001), with significantly reduced amplitudes and conduction velocities in MNSI-positive patients, highlighting their sensitivity in detecting diabetic polyneuropathy. Additionally, lower amplitudes in the MNSI-negative group indicated their potential for identifying subclinical diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparison of MNSI score with plantar sensory nerve conduction studies demonstrates that integrating both methods enhance the detection of early diabetic neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Plantar nerve conduction studies, sural nerve conduction studies, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Glycated haemoglobin.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 10","pages":"1241-1246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Score with Plantar Sensory Nerve Conduction Study in Diabetic Neuropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Saba Zaidi, Almas Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.10.1241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score and plantar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) in diabetic patients with neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from March to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Using a non-probability purposive sampling technique, patients aged between 16 and 65 years with diabetic polyneuropathy and age-method healthy controls were included in the study. Neuropathy was graded based on MNSI score. Sural and plantar NCS were performed using the standard and modified Ponsford techniques, respectively. All evaluations were performed using a Nihon Kohden electromyography system to ensure reliable results. Data were collected using a well-designed questionnaire administered by neurology trainees and later analysed by SPSS version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 participants, comprising 53 diabetic patients (33 MNSI-positive, 20 MNSI-negative) and 25 age-matched healthy controls, were analysed. MNSI-positive patients had significantly higher HbA1c and fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels compared to MNSI-negative patients with p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively. The sural nerve conduction abnormalities were found in 39.7% participants, while 51.3% participants showed plantar nerve conduction abnormalities. There was a notable association between higher MNSI score and abnormal plantar NCS (p = 0.001), with significantly reduced amplitudes and conduction velocities in MNSI-positive patients, highlighting their sensitivity in detecting diabetic polyneuropathy. Additionally, lower amplitudes in the MNSI-negative group indicated their potential for identifying subclinical diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparison of MNSI score with plantar sensory nerve conduction studies demonstrates that integrating both methods enhance the detection of early diabetic neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Plantar nerve conduction studies, sural nerve conduction studies, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Glycated haemoglobin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"1241-1246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.10.1241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.10.1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较密歇根神经病变筛查仪(MNSI)评分与足底感觉神经传导研究(NCS)对糖尿病合并神经病变的影响。研究设计:比较研究。研究地点和时间:2024年3月至8月,卡拉奇Liaquat国立医院神经内科。方法:采用非概率目的抽样技术,将年龄在16 ~ 65岁的糖尿病多发神经病变患者和年龄法健康对照纳入研究。根据MNSI评分对神经病变进行分级。分别采用标准和改良的Ponsford技术进行腓肠和足底NCS。所有评估均使用日本Kohden肌电图系统进行,以确保结果可靠。数据收集使用精心设计的问卷,由神经学学员管理,然后用SPSS 27版进行分析。结果:共分析了78名参与者,包括53名糖尿病患者(33名mnsi阳性,20名mnsi阴性)和25名年龄匹配的健康对照。mnsi阳性患者的HbA1c和空腹血糖(FBS)水平显著高于mnsi阴性患者(p = 0.005和p = 0.001)。39.7%的受试者存在腓肠神经传导异常,51.3%的受试者存在足底神经传导异常。MNSI评分较高与足底NCS异常之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.001), MNSI阳性患者的波幅和传导速度显著降低,突出了其检测糖尿病多发性神经病的敏感性。此外,mnsi阴性组的较低振幅表明它们有可能识别亚临床糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)。结论:MNSI评分与足底感觉神经传导研究相结合,可提高早期糖尿病神经病变的检出率。关键词:糖尿病周围神经病变,足底神经传导研究,腓肠神经传导研究,密歇根神经病变筛查仪,糖化血红蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Score with Plantar Sensory Nerve Conduction Study in Diabetic Neuropathy.

Objective: To compare the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score and plantar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) in diabetic patients with neuropathy.

Study design: Comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from March to August 2024.

Methodology: Using a non-probability purposive sampling technique, patients aged between 16 and 65 years with diabetic polyneuropathy and age-method healthy controls were included in the study. Neuropathy was graded based on MNSI score. Sural and plantar NCS were performed using the standard and modified Ponsford techniques, respectively. All evaluations were performed using a Nihon Kohden electromyography system to ensure reliable results. Data were collected using a well-designed questionnaire administered by neurology trainees and later analysed by SPSS version 27.

Results: A total of 78 participants, comprising 53 diabetic patients (33 MNSI-positive, 20 MNSI-negative) and 25 age-matched healthy controls, were analysed. MNSI-positive patients had significantly higher HbA1c and fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels compared to MNSI-negative patients with p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively. The sural nerve conduction abnormalities were found in 39.7% participants, while 51.3% participants showed plantar nerve conduction abnormalities. There was a notable association between higher MNSI score and abnormal plantar NCS (p = 0.001), with significantly reduced amplitudes and conduction velocities in MNSI-positive patients, highlighting their sensitivity in detecting diabetic polyneuropathy. Additionally, lower amplitudes in the MNSI-negative group indicated their potential for identifying subclinical diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

Conclusion: The comparison of MNSI score with plantar sensory nerve conduction studies demonstrates that integrating both methods enhance the detection of early diabetic neuropathy.

Key words: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Plantar nerve conduction studies, sural nerve conduction studies, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Glycated haemoglobin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信