认知行为疗法对有特殊需要儿童父母抑郁症状的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ying Guo, Jiajun Lan, Haoran He
{"title":"认知行为疗法对有特殊需要儿童父母抑郁症状的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Ying Guo, Jiajun Lan, Haoran He","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02945-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs. Additionally, it examines potential moderators of treatment outcomes, including the type of child diagnosis and the dosage of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive Literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to April 15, 2025. Peer-reviewed RCTs published in English that compared at least one structured CBT intervention to an inactive or active control group were included. Hedges' g was utilized to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) in depression scores. Random- or fixed-effects models were employed based on heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to identify moderators. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 RCTs involving 1,441 parents were included. An initial random-effects model showed a slight, non-significant reduction in depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.72, 0.07]; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). After excluding two outliers, a random-effects analysis indicated a significant effect (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.47, 0.00], p = 0.046; I<sup>2</sup> = 75.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that CBT was most effective for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), in trials using waitlist control groups, involving both parents, and when delivered over a short duration (6-8 weeks). Meta-regression demonstrated that child diagnosis type (β = 0.83, p = 0.000) and parental age (β = 0.04, p = 0.053) were significant moderators. The optimal therapeutic effect was achieved at a total intervention dose of 4 h (SMD ≈ -0.5), with parents aged 37.9 years demonstrating the most significant improvement, suggesting the necessity for individualized adjustment of the intervention protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBT demonstrated a moderate and significant effect in alleviating depressive symptoms among parents of children with special needs, particularly in the context of NDDs. This effect was most pronounced when interventions were implemented with moderate-to-high intensity, in a short-term format, and involved both parents. Furthermore, tailoring interventions according to the child's diagnosis and the total dosage of the intervention proved essential for optimizing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Guo, Jiajun Lan, Haoran He\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02945-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs. Additionally, it examines potential moderators of treatment outcomes, including the type of child diagnosis and the dosage of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive Literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to April 15, 2025. Peer-reviewed RCTs published in English that compared at least one structured CBT intervention to an inactive or active control group were included. Hedges' g was utilized to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) in depression scores. Random- or fixed-effects models were employed based on heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to identify moderators. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 RCTs involving 1,441 parents were included. An initial random-effects model showed a slight, non-significant reduction in depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.72, 0.07]; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). After excluding two outliers, a random-effects analysis indicated a significant effect (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.47, 0.00], p = 0.046; I<sup>2</sup> = 75.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that CBT was most effective for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), in trials using waitlist control groups, involving both parents, and when delivered over a short duration (6-8 weeks). Meta-regression demonstrated that child diagnosis type (β = 0.83, p = 0.000) and parental age (β = 0.04, p = 0.053) were significant moderators. The optimal therapeutic effect was achieved at a total intervention dose of 4 h (SMD ≈ -0.5), with parents aged 37.9 years demonstrating the most significant improvement, suggesting the necessity for individualized adjustment of the intervention protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBT demonstrated a moderate and significant effect in alleviating depressive symptoms among parents of children with special needs, particularly in the context of NDDs. This effect was most pronounced when interventions were implemented with moderate-to-high intensity, in a short-term format, and involved both parents. Furthermore, tailoring interventions according to the child's diagnosis and the total dosage of the intervention proved essential for optimizing outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02945-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02945-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估认知行为疗法(CBT)对有特殊需要儿童父母抑郁症状的影响。此外,它还检查了治疗结果的潜在调节因素,包括儿童诊断类型和干预剂量。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO和Cochrane Library中进行截至2025年4月15日的综合文献检索。用英文发表的同行评议的随机对照试验,将至少一个结构化的CBT干预与不活跃或积极的对照组进行了比较。使用Hedges' g计算抑郁评分的标准化平均差异(SMDs)。基于异质性,采用随机或固定效应模型(I2)。进行亚组分析和元回归来确定调节因子。偏倚风险采用Cochrane ROB2工具评估,发表偏倚采用漏斗图和Egger检验评估。结果:共纳入13项随机对照试验,涉及1441名家长。初始随机效应模型显示抑郁症状有轻微但不显著的减轻(SMD = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.72, 0.07]; I2 = 89%)。排除两个异常值后,随机效应分析显示效果显著(SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.47, 0.00], p = 0.046; I2 = 75.9%)。亚组分析显示,CBT对神经发育障碍(ndd)儿童的父母最有效,在使用等候名单对照组的试验中,涉及父母双方,并且在短时间内(6-8周)进行。meta回归显示,儿童诊断类型(β = 0.83, p = 0.000)和父母年龄(β = 0.04, p = 0.053)是显著的调节因素。在总干预剂量为4 h (SMD≈-0.5)时达到最佳治疗效果,其中37.9岁的父母表现出最显著的改善,表明有必要对干预方案进行个性化调整。结论:CBT在缓解有特殊需要儿童父母的抑郁症状方面表现出中度和显著的效果,特别是在ndd的背景下。当干预措施以中高强度、短期形式实施并涉及父母双方时,这种效果最为明显。此外,根据儿童的诊断和干预的总剂量量身定制干预证明是优化结果的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on depressive symptoms in parents of children with special needs. Additionally, it examines potential moderators of treatment outcomes, including the type of child diagnosis and the dosage of intervention.

Methods: A comprehensive Literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to April 15, 2025. Peer-reviewed RCTs published in English that compared at least one structured CBT intervention to an inactive or active control group were included. Hedges' g was utilized to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) in depression scores. Random- or fixed-effects models were employed based on heterogeneity (I2). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to identify moderators. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.

Results: A total of 13 RCTs involving 1,441 parents were included. An initial random-effects model showed a slight, non-significant reduction in depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.72, 0.07]; I2 = 89%). After excluding two outliers, a random-effects analysis indicated a significant effect (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.47, 0.00], p = 0.046; I2 = 75.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that CBT was most effective for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), in trials using waitlist control groups, involving both parents, and when delivered over a short duration (6-8 weeks). Meta-regression demonstrated that child diagnosis type (β = 0.83, p = 0.000) and parental age (β = 0.04, p = 0.053) were significant moderators. The optimal therapeutic effect was achieved at a total intervention dose of 4 h (SMD ≈ -0.5), with parents aged 37.9 years demonstrating the most significant improvement, suggesting the necessity for individualized adjustment of the intervention protocol.

Conclusion: CBT demonstrated a moderate and significant effect in alleviating depressive symptoms among parents of children with special needs, particularly in the context of NDDs. This effect was most pronounced when interventions were implemented with moderate-to-high intensity, in a short-term format, and involved both parents. Furthermore, tailoring interventions according to the child's diagnosis and the total dosage of the intervention proved essential for optimizing outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信