Sophie Lebel, Alanna Chu, Florence Gourgues, Emma Kearns, America Prudent, Ghizlène Sehabi, Yasmine W Sehabi, Sara Beattie, Sheila N Garland, Cheryl Harris, Jennifer Jones, Christine Maheu, Jacqueline L Bender, Andrea Feldstain, Josée Savard, Robin Urquhart, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Claudia Hernandez, Linda E Carlson
{"title":"调查加拿大癌症中心实施复发恐惧治疗(FORT)干预的实施前促进因素和障碍。","authors":"Sophie Lebel, Alanna Chu, Florence Gourgues, Emma Kearns, America Prudent, Ghizlène Sehabi, Yasmine W Sehabi, Sara Beattie, Sheila N Garland, Cheryl Harris, Jennifer Jones, Christine Maheu, Jacqueline L Bender, Andrea Feldstain, Josée Savard, Robin Urquhart, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Claudia Hernandez, Linda E Carlson","doi":"10.1002/pon.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the number one unmet psychosocial need of cancer survivors. Fortunately, several interventions have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing FCR in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention, a 6-week, cognitive-existential group therapy. However, few interventions are implemented in routine clinical care. The present study aims to document pre-implementation facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of clinicians and decision-makers to prepare the implementation of FORT in Canadian cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods comparative case study evaluated the process of implementing FORT in 5 Canadian clinical sites. Prior to implementation, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with clinicians and decision-makers at each site, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to uncover barriers and facilitators of implementation. Content analysis was performed on the interviews using the NVivo template provided by the CFIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 managers/decision-makers and clinicians who reported facilitators common to all sites: (1) an awareness of the need for an FCR intervention; (2) the perceived benefit of FORT's group format to reduce waitlists for individual FCR services; and (3) that offering an evidence-based intervention was within the mission of their institution. All sites identified staff shortage and concerns for equitable access to FORT as the main barriers. Each site had additional unique barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of facilitators and barriers will directly contribute to the selection of site-specific strategies and tools to optimize the implementation of FORT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 10","pages":"e70293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Pre-Implementation Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) Intervention in Canadian Cancer Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Lebel, Alanna Chu, Florence Gourgues, Emma Kearns, America Prudent, Ghizlène Sehabi, Yasmine W Sehabi, Sara Beattie, Sheila N Garland, Cheryl Harris, Jennifer Jones, Christine Maheu, Jacqueline L Bender, Andrea Feldstain, Josée Savard, Robin Urquhart, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Claudia Hernandez, Linda E Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the number one unmet psychosocial need of cancer survivors. Fortunately, several interventions have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing FCR in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention, a 6-week, cognitive-existential group therapy. However, few interventions are implemented in routine clinical care. The present study aims to document pre-implementation facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of clinicians and decision-makers to prepare the implementation of FORT in Canadian cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods comparative case study evaluated the process of implementing FORT in 5 Canadian clinical sites. Prior to implementation, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with clinicians and decision-makers at each site, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to uncover barriers and facilitators of implementation. Content analysis was performed on the interviews using the NVivo template provided by the CFIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 managers/decision-makers and clinicians who reported facilitators common to all sites: (1) an awareness of the need for an FCR intervention; (2) the perceived benefit of FORT's group format to reduce waitlists for individual FCR services; and (3) that offering an evidence-based intervention was within the mission of their institution. All sites identified staff shortage and concerns for equitable access to FORT as the main barriers. Each site had additional unique barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of facilitators and barriers will directly contribute to the selection of site-specific strategies and tools to optimize the implementation of FORT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 10\",\"pages\":\"e70293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70293\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the Pre-Implementation Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) Intervention in Canadian Cancer Centers.
Objectives: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the number one unmet psychosocial need of cancer survivors. Fortunately, several interventions have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing FCR in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention, a 6-week, cognitive-existential group therapy. However, few interventions are implemented in routine clinical care. The present study aims to document pre-implementation facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of clinicians and decision-makers to prepare the implementation of FORT in Canadian cancer centers.
Methods: This mixed-methods comparative case study evaluated the process of implementing FORT in 5 Canadian clinical sites. Prior to implementation, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with clinicians and decision-makers at each site, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to uncover barriers and facilitators of implementation. Content analysis was performed on the interviews using the NVivo template provided by the CFIR.
Results: We interviewed 20 managers/decision-makers and clinicians who reported facilitators common to all sites: (1) an awareness of the need for an FCR intervention; (2) the perceived benefit of FORT's group format to reduce waitlists for individual FCR services; and (3) that offering an evidence-based intervention was within the mission of their institution. All sites identified staff shortage and concerns for equitable access to FORT as the main barriers. Each site had additional unique barriers.
Conclusion: This analysis of facilitators and barriers will directly contribute to the selection of site-specific strategies and tools to optimize the implementation of FORT.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.