韧带重建肌腱间置与缝合悬吊关节置换术治疗拇指骨关节炎的成本-效用分析。

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007186
Chloe R Wong, Alice Zhu, David R Urbach, Helene Retrouvey, Christopher Witiw, Heather L Baltzer
{"title":"韧带重建肌腱间置与缝合悬吊关节置换术治疗拇指骨关节炎的成本-效用分析。","authors":"Chloe R Wong, Alice Zhu, David R Urbach, Helene Retrouvey, Christopher Witiw, Heather L Baltzer","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA) is a common degenerative condition that causes pain, stiffness, and disability, reducing quality of life. Surgery is a well-established treatment option when conservative management fails, but the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study compared the cost-utility of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI + T) versus suture suspension arthroplasty (SSA) for CMCJ OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare LRTI + T and SSA from a hospital payer perspective. Outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost, and net monetary benefit. Clinical outcomes such as complication rates and revision surgery were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LRTI + T had a higher complication rate (14.6%) than SSA (9.8%), but SSA had a slightly higher revision rate (7.1% versus 5.7%). Over a lifetime, SSA provided an incremental gain of 0.25 QALYs but was marginally more expensive ($2855 versus $2842). SSA yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53.80 per QALY, making it the more cost-effective strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSA is a cost-effective alternative to LRTI + T, offering valuable insights for clinicians and policymakers optimizing care for CMCJ OA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Utility Analysis of Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Versus Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe R Wong, Alice Zhu, David R Urbach, Helene Retrouvey, Christopher Witiw, Heather L Baltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA) is a common degenerative condition that causes pain, stiffness, and disability, reducing quality of life. Surgery is a well-established treatment option when conservative management fails, but the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study compared the cost-utility of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI + T) versus suture suspension arthroplasty (SSA) for CMCJ OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare LRTI + T and SSA from a hospital payer perspective. Outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost, and net monetary benefit. Clinical outcomes such as complication rates and revision surgery were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LRTI + T had a higher complication rate (14.6%) than SSA (9.8%), but SSA had a slightly higher revision rate (7.1% versus 5.7%). Over a lifetime, SSA provided an incremental gain of 0.25 QALYs but was marginally more expensive ($2855 versus $2842). SSA yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53.80 per QALY, making it the more cost-effective strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSA is a cost-effective alternative to LRTI + T, offering valuable insights for clinicians and policymakers optimizing care for CMCJ OA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"e7186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拇指腕掌关节骨性关节炎(cmcjoa)是一种常见的退行性疾病,可引起疼痛、僵硬和残疾,降低生活质量。当保守治疗失败时,手术是一种公认的治疗选择,但最佳手术方法仍有争议。本研究比较了治疗CMCJ骨性关节炎的梯形切除术联合韧带重建和肌腱间置(LRTI + T)与缝合悬吊关节置换术(SSA)的成本-效用。方法:建立马尔可夫微观模拟模型,从医院支付者的角度比较LRTI + T和SSA。结果包括增量成本-效果比、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、总成本和净货币收益。临床结果,如并发症发生率和翻修手术也进行了评估。结果:LRTI + T的并发症发生率(14.6%)高于SSA(9.8%),但SSA的翻修率略高(7.1%比5.7%)。在一生中,SSA提供了0.25个QALYs的增量收益,但成本略高(2855美元对2842美元)。社会福利制度产生的增量成本效益比为每个质量年53.80美元,使其成为更具成本效益的战略。结论:SSA是LRTI + T的低成本替代方案,为临床医生和政策制定者优化CMCJ OA患者的护理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Utility Analysis of Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Versus Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Osteoarthritis.

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA) is a common degenerative condition that causes pain, stiffness, and disability, reducing quality of life. Surgery is a well-established treatment option when conservative management fails, but the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study compared the cost-utility of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI + T) versus suture suspension arthroplasty (SSA) for CMCJ OA.

Methods: A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare LRTI + T and SSA from a hospital payer perspective. Outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost, and net monetary benefit. Clinical outcomes such as complication rates and revision surgery were also evaluated.

Results: LRTI + T had a higher complication rate (14.6%) than SSA (9.8%), but SSA had a slightly higher revision rate (7.1% versus 5.7%). Over a lifetime, SSA provided an incremental gain of 0.25 QALYs but was marginally more expensive ($2855 versus $2842). SSA yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53.80 per QALY, making it the more cost-effective strategy.

Conclusions: SSA is a cost-effective alternative to LRTI + T, offering valuable insights for clinicians and policymakers optimizing care for CMCJ OA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信