皮肤红斑狼疮的色素沉着和瘢痕形成。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Shae Chambers, Aretha On, Xiwei Yang, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Touraj Khosravi-Hafshejani, Hammad Ali, Rui Feng, Victoria P Werth
{"title":"皮肤红斑狼疮的色素沉着和瘢痕形成。","authors":"Shae Chambers, Aretha On, Xiwei Yang, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Touraj Khosravi-Hafshejani, Hammad Ali, Rui Feng, Victoria P Werth","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2025-001637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No studies have investigated the incidence and correlation of scarring and dyspigmentation across all cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) categories and subtypes. As better characterisation of such symptoms may impact how clinicians document disease damage as well as manage patients' expectations on their disease course, we set out to investigate the relationship between dyspigmentation and scarring in CLE further.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional review of our IRB-approved CLE database at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were divided by category and chronic CLE (CCLE) subtype. Dyspigmentation and scarring were quantified using the CLE Disease Area and Severity Index damage score. Data on dyspigmentation and scarring were captured from the patient visit where dyspigmentation was highest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyspigmentation and scarring significantly differed between CLE categories and CCLE subtypes. Across categories, CCLE had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Across CCLE subtypes, discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Positive correlations for dyspigmentation and scarring were seen in CCLE, DLE and LE panniculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dyspigmentation and scarring correlation differences highlight the importance of accurate assessment and documentation of both elements of damage as well as classification of CLE category and subtype. Our results reflect important differences in the CLE categories and CCLE subtypes which may be helpful for clinicians and patients as they navigate the course of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dyspigmentation and scarring in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.\",\"authors\":\"Shae Chambers, Aretha On, Xiwei Yang, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Touraj Khosravi-Hafshejani, Hammad Ali, Rui Feng, Victoria P Werth\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2025-001637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No studies have investigated the incidence and correlation of scarring and dyspigmentation across all cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) categories and subtypes. As better characterisation of such symptoms may impact how clinicians document disease damage as well as manage patients' expectations on their disease course, we set out to investigate the relationship between dyspigmentation and scarring in CLE further.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional review of our IRB-approved CLE database at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were divided by category and chronic CLE (CCLE) subtype. Dyspigmentation and scarring were quantified using the CLE Disease Area and Severity Index damage score. Data on dyspigmentation and scarring were captured from the patient visit where dyspigmentation was highest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyspigmentation and scarring significantly differed between CLE categories and CCLE subtypes. Across categories, CCLE had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Across CCLE subtypes, discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Positive correlations for dyspigmentation and scarring were seen in CCLE, DLE and LE panniculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dyspigmentation and scarring correlation differences highlight the importance of accurate assessment and documentation of both elements of damage as well as classification of CLE category and subtype. Our results reflect important differences in the CLE categories and CCLE subtypes which may be helpful for clinicians and patients as they navigate the course of the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:没有研究调查所有皮肤红斑狼疮(CLE)类别和亚型的瘢痕和色素沉着的发生率和相关性。由于更好地描述这些症状可能会影响临床医生如何记录疾病损害以及管理患者对其疾病病程的期望,我们开始进一步研究CLE中色素沉着和瘢痕形成之间的关系。方法:我们对宾夕法尼亚大学irb批准的CLE数据库进行了横断面审查。患者按慢性CLE (chronic CLE, CCLE)亚型和分类进行分组。使用CLE疾病面积和严重程度指数损伤评分量化色素沉着和瘢痕形成。色素沉着和疤痕的数据是从色素沉着最高的患者访问中捕获的。结果:不同CLE类型和亚型间色素沉着和瘢痕形成有显著性差异。在所有类别中,CCLE的色素沉着和瘢痕形成的中位数最高。在所有CCLE亚型中,盘状红斑狼疮(DLE)的色素沉着和瘢痕形成的中位数最高。CCLE、DLE和LE泛膜炎的色素沉着和瘢痕形成呈正相关。结论:色素沉着和瘢痕形成的相关性差异突出了准确评估和记录损伤因素以及CLE分类和亚型的重要性。我们的结果反映了CLE类别和CCLE亚型的重要差异,这可能对临床医生和患者在疾病过程中有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dyspigmentation and scarring in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Dyspigmentation and scarring in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Dyspigmentation and scarring in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Objective: No studies have investigated the incidence and correlation of scarring and dyspigmentation across all cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) categories and subtypes. As better characterisation of such symptoms may impact how clinicians document disease damage as well as manage patients' expectations on their disease course, we set out to investigate the relationship between dyspigmentation and scarring in CLE further.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional review of our IRB-approved CLE database at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were divided by category and chronic CLE (CCLE) subtype. Dyspigmentation and scarring were quantified using the CLE Disease Area and Severity Index damage score. Data on dyspigmentation and scarring were captured from the patient visit where dyspigmentation was highest.

Results: Dyspigmentation and scarring significantly differed between CLE categories and CCLE subtypes. Across categories, CCLE had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Across CCLE subtypes, discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) had the highest medians for dyspigmentation and scarring. Positive correlations for dyspigmentation and scarring were seen in CCLE, DLE and LE panniculitis.

Conclusions: Dyspigmentation and scarring correlation differences highlight the importance of accurate assessment and documentation of both elements of damage as well as classification of CLE category and subtype. Our results reflect important differences in the CLE categories and CCLE subtypes which may be helpful for clinicians and patients as they navigate the course of the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信