评估20% IR3535®缓释制剂和25%避蚊胺驱蚊剂在加纳野外环境中的驱蚊效果。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Mufeez Abudu, Andy Asafu-Adjaye, Joseph Harold Nyarko Osei, Kwadwo Kyereme Frempong, Osei Kwaku Akuoko, Sellase Pi-Bansa, Mavis Ofei, Helena Anokyewaa Boakye, Jane Ansah-Owusu, Sandra-Candys Adwirba Arkorful, Michelle Ayuritolya Asigbaase, Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah, Beatrice Greco, Delalih Manteau, Thalita Jesus, Daniel Oppong, Andy Mahler, Daniel Adjei Boakye, Samuel Kweku Dadzie
{"title":"评估20% IR3535®缓释制剂和25%避蚊胺驱蚊剂在加纳野外环境中的驱蚊效果。","authors":"Mufeez Abudu, Andy Asafu-Adjaye, Joseph Harold Nyarko Osei, Kwadwo Kyereme Frempong, Osei Kwaku Akuoko, Sellase Pi-Bansa, Mavis Ofei, Helena Anokyewaa Boakye, Jane Ansah-Owusu, Sandra-Candys Adwirba Arkorful, Michelle Ayuritolya Asigbaase, Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah, Beatrice Greco, Delalih Manteau, Thalita Jesus, Daniel Oppong, Andy Mahler, Daniel Adjei Boakye, Samuel Kweku Dadzie","doi":"10.1186/s13071-025-06946-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal protection with topical skin repellents has been advocated for use against vector-borne diseases. This study compared the efficacies of a 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> lotion with Staytec technology formulation and 25% DEET lotion in repelling mosquitoes in two rural communities in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mosquito biting densities were established at baseline and during the intervention using human landing collections (HLC). These were carried out overnight from 21:00-06:00 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). Prior to the HLC, the exposed legs were treated with either a lotion of the 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> or 25% DEET (as test) at a rate of 1 g/600 cm<sup>2</sup>, and 70% ethanol (as control). The sampling (HLC) was performed using the Latin square design. Mosquito species were identified morphologically using some keys and molecularly using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Evaluations were carried out to determine the knock down resistant (kdr) allele frequencies. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite proteins was identified using immunological method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The major malaria vector observed in the study area was An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) with high frequencies of kdr-west mutation in the population. The 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> and 25% DEET treatments reduced mosquito bites by 98% and 95%, respectively, compared with the control (P < 0.01). The collectors were protected by the 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> and 25% DEET for about 92% and 89% of the time, respectively. There was also a sustained protection of the two repellents for 9 h. This protection prevented infectious bites in the treatment group compared with the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> with Staytec technology can provide significant protection against Anopheles and other mosquito bites and will be useful for complementing other vector control interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"18 1","pages":"398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy of 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> with a sustained-release formulation and 25% DEET insect repellents against mosquitoes in a field setting in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Mufeez Abudu, Andy Asafu-Adjaye, Joseph Harold Nyarko Osei, Kwadwo Kyereme Frempong, Osei Kwaku Akuoko, Sellase Pi-Bansa, Mavis Ofei, Helena Anokyewaa Boakye, Jane Ansah-Owusu, Sandra-Candys Adwirba Arkorful, Michelle Ayuritolya Asigbaase, Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah, Beatrice Greco, Delalih Manteau, Thalita Jesus, Daniel Oppong, Andy Mahler, Daniel Adjei Boakye, Samuel Kweku Dadzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13071-025-06946-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal protection with topical skin repellents has been advocated for use against vector-borne diseases. This study compared the efficacies of a 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> lotion with Staytec technology formulation and 25% DEET lotion in repelling mosquitoes in two rural communities in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mosquito biting densities were established at baseline and during the intervention using human landing collections (HLC). These were carried out overnight from 21:00-06:00 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). Prior to the HLC, the exposed legs were treated with either a lotion of the 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> or 25% DEET (as test) at a rate of 1 g/600 cm<sup>2</sup>, and 70% ethanol (as control). The sampling (HLC) was performed using the Latin square design. Mosquito species were identified morphologically using some keys and molecularly using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Evaluations were carried out to determine the knock down resistant (kdr) allele frequencies. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite proteins was identified using immunological method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The major malaria vector observed in the study area was An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) with high frequencies of kdr-west mutation in the population. The 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> and 25% DEET treatments reduced mosquito bites by 98% and 95%, respectively, compared with the control (P < 0.01). The collectors were protected by the 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> and 25% DEET for about 92% and 89% of the time, respectively. There was also a sustained protection of the two repellents for 9 h. This protection prevented infectious bites in the treatment group compared with the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> with Staytec technology can provide significant protection against Anopheles and other mosquito bites and will be useful for complementing other vector control interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasites & Vectors\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasites & Vectors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06946-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06946-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:个人保护外用皮肤驱虫剂已被提倡用于预防媒介传播的疾病。本研究比较了含Staytec技术配方的20% IR3535®洗剂和25%避蚊胺洗剂在加纳两个农村社区的驱蚊效果。方法:采用人落采集法在基线和干预期间测定蚊虫叮人密度。这些是在格林尼治标准时间(GMT)晚上21:00-06:00进行的。在hplc之前,暴露的腿用20% IR3535®或25%避蚊胺的洗液(作为测试)以1 g/600 cm2的速率和70%乙醇(作为对照)处理。采用拉丁方设计进行抽样。利用一些关键字进行形态鉴定,利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行分子鉴定。进行评估以确定抗敲降(kdr)等位基因频率。用免疫学方法鉴定了恶性疟原虫环孢子子蛋白的存在。结果:研究区主要疟疾媒介为安蚊;冈比亚感蚊(Gambiae sensu lato, s.l)种群中kdr-west突变频率高。与对照组(P®和25%避蚊胺)相比,20%的IR3535®和25%的避蚊胺分别减少了98%和95%的蚊虫叮咬,分别减少了92%和89%的时间。两种驱蚊剂也有持续9小时的保护作用。与对照组相比,治疗组的这种保护作用防止了传染性叮咬。结论:经Staytec技术处理的20% IR3535可有效预防按蚊和其他蚊虫叮咬,可作为其他病媒控制措施的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the efficacy of 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> with a sustained-release formulation and 25% DEET insect repellents against mosquitoes in a field setting in Ghana.

Evaluation of the efficacy of 20% IR3535<sup>®</sup> with a sustained-release formulation and 25% DEET insect repellents against mosquitoes in a field setting in Ghana.

Evaluation of the efficacy of 20% IR3535® with a sustained-release formulation and 25% DEET insect repellents against mosquitoes in a field setting in Ghana.

Background: Personal protection with topical skin repellents has been advocated for use against vector-borne diseases. This study compared the efficacies of a 20% IR3535® lotion with Staytec technology formulation and 25% DEET lotion in repelling mosquitoes in two rural communities in Ghana.

Methods: Mosquito biting densities were established at baseline and during the intervention using human landing collections (HLC). These were carried out overnight from 21:00-06:00 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). Prior to the HLC, the exposed legs were treated with either a lotion of the 20% IR3535® or 25% DEET (as test) at a rate of 1 g/600 cm2, and 70% ethanol (as control). The sampling (HLC) was performed using the Latin square design. Mosquito species were identified morphologically using some keys and molecularly using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Evaluations were carried out to determine the knock down resistant (kdr) allele frequencies. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite proteins was identified using immunological method.

Results: The major malaria vector observed in the study area was An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) with high frequencies of kdr-west mutation in the population. The 20% IR3535® and 25% DEET treatments reduced mosquito bites by 98% and 95%, respectively, compared with the control (P < 0.01). The collectors were protected by the 20% IR3535® and 25% DEET for about 92% and 89% of the time, respectively. There was also a sustained protection of the two repellents for 9 h. This protection prevented infectious bites in the treatment group compared with the control.

Conclusions: The 20% IR3535® with Staytec technology can provide significant protection against Anopheles and other mosquito bites and will be useful for complementing other vector control interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish. Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信