儿童持续性气管皮瘘的处理:儿科耳鼻喉科医生的调查。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jeyasakthy Saniasiaya , Ed Toll , Craig McCaffer , Michel Neeff , Graeme van der Meer , Colin Barber , Hannah Burns
{"title":"儿童持续性气管皮瘘的处理:儿科耳鼻喉科医生的调查。","authors":"Jeyasakthy Saniasiaya ,&nbsp;Ed Toll ,&nbsp;Craig McCaffer ,&nbsp;Michel Neeff ,&nbsp;Graeme van der Meer ,&nbsp;Colin Barber ,&nbsp;Hannah Burns","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent tracheocutaneous fistula (TCF) is a common sequelae following paediatric tracheostomy, often leading to significant morbidity for both the child and their caregivers. Its presence can result in chronic airway issues, increased risk of infection, impaired phonation, cosmetic concerns, and a substantial psychosocial burden for families. We aim to evaluate the current practices, preferences, and variations among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists worldwide in the management of persistent (TCF) in children to identify areas of consensus and gaps that may guide future standardisation of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 24-item cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed via a global WhatsApp™ group of paediatric otorhinolaryngologists between July and August 2024. The survey assessed surgical preferences, timing of intervention, preoperative investigations, and postoperative care. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to analyse practice variations based on years of experience and surgical preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 319 members invited to participate, 121 paediatric otorhinolaryngologists completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 37.9 %. 121 Paediatric Otorhinolaryngologists answered the survey. Respondents were from six different continents, with the majority from Europe, 43 %. 68.6 % of the respondents have been practising for more than 10 years. The mean of tracheostomies performed in a year among the respondents was 10.6 per year. 46.5 % of respondents preferred primary closure and healing by secondary intention by 46.5 %, while 7 % preferred both surgical techniques. Airway assessment will be performed by 87 % of the respondents before the closure of TCF. The surgeons who performed more tracheostomies were found to prefer primary closure (p = 0.034). Choice of closure was not associated with years of experience, place of practice, underlying comorbidities, and investigations performed (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is significant variation in the management of persistent TCF among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists. Primary closure and healing by secondary intention were equally favoured, with surgical choice influenced by patient-specific factors, institutional resources, and regional practices, although surgeons who perform more tracheostomies prefer primary closure of TCF. Preoperative airway assessment was widely adopted, but postoperative follow-up protocols varied. Given the lack of standardised guidelines, a multicentre prospective study is warranted to establish evidence-based recommendations for optimal TCF management.Level of Evidence: V.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 112583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of persistent tracheocutaneous fistula in children: Survey among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists\",\"authors\":\"Jeyasakthy Saniasiaya ,&nbsp;Ed Toll ,&nbsp;Craig McCaffer ,&nbsp;Michel Neeff ,&nbsp;Graeme van der Meer ,&nbsp;Colin Barber ,&nbsp;Hannah Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent tracheocutaneous fistula (TCF) is a common sequelae following paediatric tracheostomy, often leading to significant morbidity for both the child and their caregivers. Its presence can result in chronic airway issues, increased risk of infection, impaired phonation, cosmetic concerns, and a substantial psychosocial burden for families. We aim to evaluate the current practices, preferences, and variations among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists worldwide in the management of persistent (TCF) in children to identify areas of consensus and gaps that may guide future standardisation of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 24-item cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed via a global WhatsApp™ group of paediatric otorhinolaryngologists between July and August 2024. The survey assessed surgical preferences, timing of intervention, preoperative investigations, and postoperative care. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to analyse practice variations based on years of experience and surgical preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 319 members invited to participate, 121 paediatric otorhinolaryngologists completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 37.9 %. 121 Paediatric Otorhinolaryngologists answered the survey. Respondents were from six different continents, with the majority from Europe, 43 %. 68.6 % of the respondents have been practising for more than 10 years. The mean of tracheostomies performed in a year among the respondents was 10.6 per year. 46.5 % of respondents preferred primary closure and healing by secondary intention by 46.5 %, while 7 % preferred both surgical techniques. Airway assessment will be performed by 87 % of the respondents before the closure of TCF. The surgeons who performed more tracheostomies were found to prefer primary closure (p = 0.034). Choice of closure was not associated with years of experience, place of practice, underlying comorbidities, and investigations performed (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is significant variation in the management of persistent TCF among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists. Primary closure and healing by secondary intention were equally favoured, with surgical choice influenced by patient-specific factors, institutional resources, and regional practices, although surgeons who perform more tracheostomies prefer primary closure of TCF. Preoperative airway assessment was widely adopted, but postoperative follow-up protocols varied. Given the lack of standardised guidelines, a multicentre prospective study is warranted to establish evidence-based recommendations for optimal TCF management.Level of Evidence: V.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625003714\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625003714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:持续性气管皮瘘(TCF)是儿童气管切开术后常见的后遗症,通常会导致儿童及其护理人员的严重发病率。它的存在可导致慢性气道问题、感染风险增加、发音受损、美容问题以及家庭的重大心理社会负担。我们旨在评估目前世界范围内儿科耳鼻喉科医生在儿童持续性(TCF)管理方面的实践、偏好和差异,以确定共识和差距,从而指导未来的标准化护理。方法:在2024年7月至8月期间,通过全球儿科耳鼻喉科医生WhatsApp™小组开发并分发了一项24项横断面调查。该调查评估了手术选择、干预时间、术前调查和术后护理。使用描述性统计和卡方检验来分析基于多年经验和手术偏好的实践变化。结果:在319名受邀成员中,121名儿科耳鼻喉科医生完成了调查,回复率为37.9%。121名儿科耳鼻喉科医生接受了调查。受访者来自六个不同的大洲,其中大多数来自欧洲,占43%。68.6%的受访者从业10年以上。受访者平均每年进行气管切开术10.6例。46.5%的应答者首选初次闭合,46.5%的应答者首选二次愈合,而7%的应答者首选两种手术技术。87%的应答者将在TCF关闭前进行气道评估。行气管切开术较多的外科医生更倾向于一期封闭(p = 0.034)。闭合方式的选择与经验年限、手术地点、潜在合并症和进行的检查无关(p < 0.05)。结论:小儿耳鼻喉科医师对持续性TCF的处理存在显著差异。手术选择受患者特定因素、机构资源和地区实践的影响,虽然施行气管造口手术较多的外科医生更倾向于首次关闭TCF,但初级关闭和继发性愈合同样受到青睐。术前气道评估被广泛采用,但术后随访方案各不相同。鉴于缺乏标准化指南,有必要进行多中心前瞻性研究,以建立基于证据的最佳TCF管理建议。证据等级:V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of persistent tracheocutaneous fistula in children: Survey among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists

Introduction

Persistent tracheocutaneous fistula (TCF) is a common sequelae following paediatric tracheostomy, often leading to significant morbidity for both the child and their caregivers. Its presence can result in chronic airway issues, increased risk of infection, impaired phonation, cosmetic concerns, and a substantial psychosocial burden for families. We aim to evaluate the current practices, preferences, and variations among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists worldwide in the management of persistent (TCF) in children to identify areas of consensus and gaps that may guide future standardisation of care.

Methods

A 24-item cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed via a global WhatsApp™ group of paediatric otorhinolaryngologists between July and August 2024. The survey assessed surgical preferences, timing of intervention, preoperative investigations, and postoperative care. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to analyse practice variations based on years of experience and surgical preferences.

Results

Out of 319 members invited to participate, 121 paediatric otorhinolaryngologists completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 37.9 %. 121 Paediatric Otorhinolaryngologists answered the survey. Respondents were from six different continents, with the majority from Europe, 43 %. 68.6 % of the respondents have been practising for more than 10 years. The mean of tracheostomies performed in a year among the respondents was 10.6 per year. 46.5 % of respondents preferred primary closure and healing by secondary intention by 46.5 %, while 7 % preferred both surgical techniques. Airway assessment will be performed by 87 % of the respondents before the closure of TCF. The surgeons who performed more tracheostomies were found to prefer primary closure (p = 0.034). Choice of closure was not associated with years of experience, place of practice, underlying comorbidities, and investigations performed (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

There is significant variation in the management of persistent TCF among paediatric otorhinolaryngologists. Primary closure and healing by secondary intention were equally favoured, with surgical choice influenced by patient-specific factors, institutional resources, and regional practices, although surgeons who perform more tracheostomies prefer primary closure of TCF. Preoperative airway assessment was widely adopted, but postoperative follow-up protocols varied. Given the lack of standardised guidelines, a multicentre prospective study is warranted to establish evidence-based recommendations for optimal TCF management.Level of Evidence: V.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信