成人酒精使用障碍心理社会干预的最佳证据综述:基于证据的回顾

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S538359
Lu Yan, Cai-Fang Ji, Li-Ping Xia, Wenxi Sun, Jian-Qin Shi, Xiao-Dong Wu
{"title":"成人酒精使用障碍心理社会干预的最佳证据综述:基于证据的回顾","authors":"Lu Yan, Cai-Fang Ji, Li-Ping Xia, Wenxi Sun, Jian-Qin Shi, Xiao-Dong Wu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S538359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is the most common of all substance use disorders worldwide. Psychosocial interventions have been established as a core component of AUD management. However, current research evidence on psychosocial interventions for AUD is fragmented and lacks systematic, standardized protocols in this population, which constrains its standardized implementation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the evidence on psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD, aiming to inform clinical decision-making and support healthcare professionals in tailoring personalized psychosocial interventions for patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed across 22 databases and websites for clinical decisions, recommended practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials regarding psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD. The search period extended from the inception of the database to February 2025. Two trained researchers independently evaluated the literature's quality and systematically extracted and summarized the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included, consisting of six clinical decisions, four guidelines, six systematic reviews, and four randomized controlled trials. Synthesis of evidence from these studies identified twenty-seven pieces of evidence, which were further categorized into eight dimensions: pre-intervention assessment, intervention goals, scope of application, multidisciplinary team involvement, intervention timing, intervention frequency, monitoring frequency and indicators, and precautions. These dimensions represent the primary areas of evidence derived from the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study systematically synthesized the most robust evidence for psychosocial interventions in adults with AUD. The evidence confirmed that implementing psychosocial interventions based on considering hospital resources and patient preferences can effectively reduce alcohol consumption, depression, anxiety, and improve long-term outcomes in adults with AUD. This evidence-based framework established a practical and scientific basis for standardized psychosocial intervention delivery in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"6315-6327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summary of Best Evidence for Psychosocial Interventions in Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder: An Evidence-Based Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Yan, Cai-Fang Ji, Li-Ping Xia, Wenxi Sun, Jian-Qin Shi, Xiao-Dong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S538359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is the most common of all substance use disorders worldwide. Psychosocial interventions have been established as a core component of AUD management. However, current research evidence on psychosocial interventions for AUD is fragmented and lacks systematic, standardized protocols in this population, which constrains its standardized implementation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the evidence on psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD, aiming to inform clinical decision-making and support healthcare professionals in tailoring personalized psychosocial interventions for patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed across 22 databases and websites for clinical decisions, recommended practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials regarding psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD. The search period extended from the inception of the database to February 2025. Two trained researchers independently evaluated the literature's quality and systematically extracted and summarized the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included, consisting of six clinical decisions, four guidelines, six systematic reviews, and four randomized controlled trials. Synthesis of evidence from these studies identified twenty-seven pieces of evidence, which were further categorized into eight dimensions: pre-intervention assessment, intervention goals, scope of application, multidisciplinary team involvement, intervention timing, intervention frequency, monitoring frequency and indicators, and precautions. These dimensions represent the primary areas of evidence derived from the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study systematically synthesized the most robust evidence for psychosocial interventions in adults with AUD. The evidence confirmed that implementing psychosocial interventions based on considering hospital resources and patient preferences can effectively reduce alcohol consumption, depression, anxiety, and improve long-term outcomes in adults with AUD. This evidence-based framework established a practical and scientific basis for standardized psychosocial intervention delivery in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"6315-6327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S538359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S538359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)是全世界所有物质使用障碍中最常见的。社会心理干预已被确立为AUD管理的核心组成部分。然而,目前关于AUD心理社会干预的研究证据是碎片化的,并且在这一人群中缺乏系统的、标准化的协议,这限制了其在临床实践中的标准化实施。目的:检索、评估和总结成年AUD患者心理社会干预的证据,旨在为临床决策提供信息,并支持医疗保健专业人员为患者量身定制个性化的心理社会干预。患者和方法:对22个数据库和网站进行了系统的检索,包括关于成年AUD患者心理社会干预的临床决策、推荐做法、指南、证据摘要、专家共识、系统评价和随机对照试验。检索期从数据库建立之初一直延长到2025年2月。两名训练有素的研究人员独立评估文献的质量,并系统地提取和总结现有证据。结果:共纳入20项研究,包括6项临床决策、4项指南、6项系统评价和4项随机对照试验。综合这些研究的证据,确定了27条证据,并将其进一步分为干预前评估、干预目标、适用范围、多学科团队参与、干预时机、干预频率、监测频率和指标、预防措施八个维度。这些维度代表了从纳入的研究中获得的主要证据领域。结论:本研究系统地综合了成年AUD患者心理社会干预的最有力证据。证据证实,在考虑医院资源和患者偏好的基础上实施社会心理干预可以有效减少酒精消耗、抑郁、焦虑,并改善成年AUD患者的长期预后。这一基于证据的框架为临床环境中标准化的社会心理干预提供奠定了实用和科学的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Summary of Best Evidence for Psychosocial Interventions in Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder: An Evidence-Based Review.

Background: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is the most common of all substance use disorders worldwide. Psychosocial interventions have been established as a core component of AUD management. However, current research evidence on psychosocial interventions for AUD is fragmented and lacks systematic, standardized protocols in this population, which constrains its standardized implementation in clinical practice.

Purpose: To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the evidence on psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD, aiming to inform clinical decision-making and support healthcare professionals in tailoring personalized psychosocial interventions for patients.

Patients and methods: A systematic search was performed across 22 databases and websites for clinical decisions, recommended practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials regarding psychosocial interventions for adults with AUD. The search period extended from the inception of the database to February 2025. Two trained researchers independently evaluated the literature's quality and systematically extracted and summarized the available evidence.

Results: A total of 20 studies were included, consisting of six clinical decisions, four guidelines, six systematic reviews, and four randomized controlled trials. Synthesis of evidence from these studies identified twenty-seven pieces of evidence, which were further categorized into eight dimensions: pre-intervention assessment, intervention goals, scope of application, multidisciplinary team involvement, intervention timing, intervention frequency, monitoring frequency and indicators, and precautions. These dimensions represent the primary areas of evidence derived from the included studies.

Conclusion: This study systematically synthesized the most robust evidence for psychosocial interventions in adults with AUD. The evidence confirmed that implementing psychosocial interventions based on considering hospital resources and patient preferences can effectively reduce alcohol consumption, depression, anxiety, and improve long-term outcomes in adults with AUD. This evidence-based framework established a practical and scientific basis for standardized psychosocial intervention delivery in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信