Dariusz Halabowski, Abhishek Nair Anil, Grzegorz Zięba, Kacper Pyrzanowski, Joanna Grabowska, Carl Smith, Martin Reichard
{"title":"生物入侵的时间动态:本地和外来寄主物种对寄主质量的感知不同。","authors":"Dariusz Halabowski, Abhishek Nair Anil, Grzegorz Zięba, Kacper Pyrzanowski, Joanna Grabowska, Carl Smith, Martin Reichard","doi":"10.1002/ece3.72270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The spread of non-native species into new regions is a dynamic process driven by behavioural adaptations to local environments and species interactions. Interactions between coexisting populations can lead to localised coevolutionary patterns, shaped by the duration of their co-occurrence. We investigated the relationship between the European bitterling fish (<i>Rhodeus amarus</i>), a parasitic fish that lays eggs in the gills of unionid mussels, and an invasive mussel host, <i>Sinanodonta woodiana</i>, which has spread across Europe over the past 50 years. The bitterling, a host generalist, can parasitise any European unionid mussel species, but its reproductive success with <i>S. woodiana</i> is limited due to the mussel's ability to reject bitterling eggs. We tested three hypotheses on the role of rapid local coevolution in host choice using <i>S. woodiana</i> populations with recent (5 years), intermediate (17 years), and long-term (40+ years) associations with European bitterling. We experimentally evaluated the spawning preferences of four bitterling populations: three coexisting with their respective <i>S. woodiana</i> populations and one naïve to <i>S. woodiana</i>. All bitterling populations avoided <i>S. woodiana</i> from the most recently established population. Neither local coexistence nor individual mussel quality influenced bitterling responses to <i>S. woodiana</i>. In contrast, bitterling selected native <i>Anodonta anatina</i> mussels based on individual quality rather than population identity. These findings suggest that native species can recognise and avoid an invasive host at the invasion front, where co-occurrence is recent.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Dynamics of Biological Invasions: Perception of Host Quality Differs Between Native and Alien Host Species\",\"authors\":\"Dariusz Halabowski, Abhishek Nair Anil, Grzegorz Zięba, Kacper Pyrzanowski, Joanna Grabowska, Carl Smith, Martin Reichard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.72270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The spread of non-native species into new regions is a dynamic process driven by behavioural adaptations to local environments and species interactions. Interactions between coexisting populations can lead to localised coevolutionary patterns, shaped by the duration of their co-occurrence. We investigated the relationship between the European bitterling fish (<i>Rhodeus amarus</i>), a parasitic fish that lays eggs in the gills of unionid mussels, and an invasive mussel host, <i>Sinanodonta woodiana</i>, which has spread across Europe over the past 50 years. The bitterling, a host generalist, can parasitise any European unionid mussel species, but its reproductive success with <i>S. woodiana</i> is limited due to the mussel's ability to reject bitterling eggs. We tested three hypotheses on the role of rapid local coevolution in host choice using <i>S. woodiana</i> populations with recent (5 years), intermediate (17 years), and long-term (40+ years) associations with European bitterling. We experimentally evaluated the spawning preferences of four bitterling populations: three coexisting with their respective <i>S. woodiana</i> populations and one naïve to <i>S. woodiana</i>. All bitterling populations avoided <i>S. woodiana</i> from the most recently established population. Neither local coexistence nor individual mussel quality influenced bitterling responses to <i>S. woodiana</i>. In contrast, bitterling selected native <i>Anodonta anatina</i> mussels based on individual quality rather than population identity. These findings suggest that native species can recognise and avoid an invasive host at the invasion front, where co-occurrence is recent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal Dynamics of Biological Invasions: Perception of Host Quality Differs Between Native and Alien Host Species
The spread of non-native species into new regions is a dynamic process driven by behavioural adaptations to local environments and species interactions. Interactions between coexisting populations can lead to localised coevolutionary patterns, shaped by the duration of their co-occurrence. We investigated the relationship between the European bitterling fish (Rhodeus amarus), a parasitic fish that lays eggs in the gills of unionid mussels, and an invasive mussel host, Sinanodonta woodiana, which has spread across Europe over the past 50 years. The bitterling, a host generalist, can parasitise any European unionid mussel species, but its reproductive success with S. woodiana is limited due to the mussel's ability to reject bitterling eggs. We tested three hypotheses on the role of rapid local coevolution in host choice using S. woodiana populations with recent (5 years), intermediate (17 years), and long-term (40+ years) associations with European bitterling. We experimentally evaluated the spawning preferences of four bitterling populations: three coexisting with their respective S. woodiana populations and one naïve to S. woodiana. All bitterling populations avoided S. woodiana from the most recently established population. Neither local coexistence nor individual mussel quality influenced bitterling responses to S. woodiana. In contrast, bitterling selected native Anodonta anatina mussels based on individual quality rather than population identity. These findings suggest that native species can recognise and avoid an invasive host at the invasion front, where co-occurrence is recent.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.