Cristina Barboi, Fatemehalsadat Shojaei, Leslie Gardner, Nick Stewart, Fereshtehossadat Shojaei, Mark Seidman, Richard J Holden, Nicole R Fowler, Diana Summanwar, Brooke Stephanian, Malaz Boustani
{"title":"敏捷助推大学创新论坛：解决现实问题。","authors":"Cristina Barboi, Fatemehalsadat Shojaei, Leslie Gardner, Nick Stewart, Fereshtehossadat Shojaei, Mark Seidman, Richard J Holden, Nicole R Fowler, Diana Summanwar, Brooke Stephanian, Malaz Boustani","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Indiana University Innovation Forum is an online group-based problem-solving platform that brings together physicians, nurses, social workers, patients, healthcare managers, and other key stakeholders to tackle complex healthcare challenges. This study analyzes the data generated during the Agile Nudge University Innovation Forum (ANUIF) events from October 2022 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-methods study consisting of a quantitative analysis of the ANUIF events, including participant numbers, level of satisfaction, and the number of solutions created, as well as a qualitative appraisal of the solution themes generated by participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of attendees for the Innovation Forums was 14.83 (SD = 6.92), and the mean satisfaction score was 51.56 (SD = 25.08). The average number of generated solutions per forum was 16 (SD = 5.1), with an average of 10.71 (SD = 3.16) <i>main solutions and</i> 4.38 (SD = 3.71) <i>sub-solutions.</i> The average number of old or <i>existing solutions</i> was 6.19 (SD = 2.94), and the average number of <i>novel solutions</i> was 4.52 (SD = 2.44). The administrative changes, followed by the implementation of the ANUIF dashboard and control charts, resulted in significant increases in the number of participants contacted, respondents, registered attendees, and actual attendees. There were significant differences in the average Net Promoter Scores between the attendee cohorts included in the study. The qualitative analysis of Innovation Forums identified five common themes; the most common themes were <i>Adaptive innovation</i> and <i>Collaborative Problem-Solving</i>.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A streamlined Innovation Forum process ensured a steady number of participants with average satisfaction scores. The attendees generated innovative, generalizable solutions applicable to \"real-world\" healthcare challenges. Participants generated more than one solution and sub-solutions to the discussed problems, demonstrating an understanding of agile science-based problem-solving, ideation, and innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1585562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agile Nudge University Innovation Forum: solving real-world problems.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Barboi, Fatemehalsadat Shojaei, Leslie Gardner, Nick Stewart, Fereshtehossadat Shojaei, Mark Seidman, Richard J Holden, Nicole R Fowler, Diana Summanwar, Brooke Stephanian, Malaz Boustani\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Indiana University Innovation Forum is an online group-based problem-solving platform that brings together physicians, nurses, social workers, patients, healthcare managers, and other key stakeholders to tackle complex healthcare challenges. This study analyzes the data generated during the Agile Nudge University Innovation Forum (ANUIF) events from October 2022 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-methods study consisting of a quantitative analysis of the ANUIF events, including participant numbers, level of satisfaction, and the number of solutions created, as well as a qualitative appraisal of the solution themes generated by participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of attendees for the Innovation Forums was 14.83 (SD = 6.92), and the mean satisfaction score was 51.56 (SD = 25.08). The average number of generated solutions per forum was 16 (SD = 5.1), with an average of 10.71 (SD = 3.16) <i>main solutions and</i> 4.38 (SD = 3.71) <i>sub-solutions.</i> The average number of old or <i>existing solutions</i> was 6.19 (SD = 2.94), and the average number of <i>novel solutions</i> was 4.52 (SD = 2.44). The administrative changes, followed by the implementation of the ANUIF dashboard and control charts, resulted in significant increases in the number of participants contacted, respondents, registered attendees, and actual attendees. There were significant differences in the average Net Promoter Scores between the attendee cohorts included in the study. The qualitative analysis of Innovation Forums identified five common themes; the most common themes were <i>Adaptive innovation</i> and <i>Collaborative Problem-Solving</i>.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A streamlined Innovation Forum process ensured a steady number of participants with average satisfaction scores. The attendees generated innovative, generalizable solutions applicable to \\\"real-world\\\" healthcare challenges. Participants generated more than one solution and sub-solutions to the discussed problems, demonstrating an understanding of agile science-based problem-solving, ideation, and innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1585562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agile Nudge University Innovation Forum: solving real-world problems.
Introduction: The Indiana University Innovation Forum is an online group-based problem-solving platform that brings together physicians, nurses, social workers, patients, healthcare managers, and other key stakeholders to tackle complex healthcare challenges. This study analyzes the data generated during the Agile Nudge University Innovation Forum (ANUIF) events from October 2022 to December 2024.
Methods: This is a mixed-methods study consisting of a quantitative analysis of the ANUIF events, including participant numbers, level of satisfaction, and the number of solutions created, as well as a qualitative appraisal of the solution themes generated by participants.
Results: The average number of attendees for the Innovation Forums was 14.83 (SD = 6.92), and the mean satisfaction score was 51.56 (SD = 25.08). The average number of generated solutions per forum was 16 (SD = 5.1), with an average of 10.71 (SD = 3.16) main solutions and 4.38 (SD = 3.71) sub-solutions. The average number of old or existing solutions was 6.19 (SD = 2.94), and the average number of novel solutions was 4.52 (SD = 2.44). The administrative changes, followed by the implementation of the ANUIF dashboard and control charts, resulted in significant increases in the number of participants contacted, respondents, registered attendees, and actual attendees. There were significant differences in the average Net Promoter Scores between the attendee cohorts included in the study. The qualitative analysis of Innovation Forums identified five common themes; the most common themes were Adaptive innovation and Collaborative Problem-Solving.
Discussion: A streamlined Innovation Forum process ensured a steady number of participants with average satisfaction scores. The attendees generated innovative, generalizable solutions applicable to "real-world" healthcare challenges. Participants generated more than one solution and sub-solutions to the discussed problems, demonstrating an understanding of agile science-based problem-solving, ideation, and innovation.
期刊介绍：
Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice.
Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
