在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中识别高残留风险亚群的现象图:VICTORIA亚研究。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Palak Shah, Yinggan Zheng, Burkert Pieske, Vojtech Melenovsky, Carolyn S P Lam, Karen Sliwa, Javed Butler, Justin A Ezekowitz, Christopher R deFilippi, Christopher M O'Connor, Roopinder K Sandhu, Lothar Roessig, Jasper Tromp, Cynthia M Westerhout, Adriaan A Voors, Paul W Armstrong
{"title":"在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中识别高残留风险亚群的现象图:VICTORIA亚研究。","authors":"Palak Shah, Yinggan Zheng, Burkert Pieske, Vojtech Melenovsky, Carolyn S P Lam, Karen Sliwa, Javed Butler, Justin A Ezekowitz, Christopher R deFilippi, Christopher M O'Connor, Roopinder K Sandhu, Lothar Roessig, Jasper Tromp, Cynthia M Westerhout, Adriaan A Voors, Paul W Armstrong","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a high residual risk for heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. We aimed to use multimodality data to identify unique HFrEF subgroups with high residual risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this VICTORIA substudy (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, quantitative biomarker, and targeted proteomics data were collected. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using 105 variables to define HFrEF phenogroups. Cox regression estimated the relationship between the HFrEF phenogroups and the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. External validation of the phenogroups was performed in the BIOSTAT-CHF cohort (Biology Study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure). Multinomial logistic regression identified the most important variables in defining the HFrEF phenogroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 564 participants; after clustering, the optimal number of HFrEF phenogroups was 3. Phenogroup 1 was young, well-treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, and least likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Phenogroup 2 had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation and pathological Q-waves on electrocardiography. Phenogroup 3 was older, had more biventricular dysfunction, and had advanced renal disease. A stepwise increase in risk of the primary composite outcome was observed from HFrEF phenogroup 1 to 3 (hazard ratio, 7.0 [95% CI, 4.1-12.0]; <i>P</i>≤0.01). The phenogroups were externally validated in BIOSTAT-CHF, and phenogroup 3 had similar patient characteristics (eg, older with more significant renal dysfunction) and had the highest event rate at 1 year (41% [95% CI, 38-45]). After multinomial regression, GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15) was most important in discriminating the 3 HFrEF phenogroups in both VICTORIA and BIOSTAT-CHF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified and externally validated unique HFrEF subpopulations with shared biological characteristics that differentiated residual risk for cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. GDF-15 was the most important protein used to distinguish the 3 HFrEF phenogroups. These findings may inform study entry criteria for future HFrEF trials focused on the development of novel therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02861534.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e013166"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenomapping in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction to Identify Subpopulations With High Residual Risk: A VICTORIA Substudy.\",\"authors\":\"Palak Shah, Yinggan Zheng, Burkert Pieske, Vojtech Melenovsky, Carolyn S P Lam, Karen Sliwa, Javed Butler, Justin A Ezekowitz, Christopher R deFilippi, Christopher M O'Connor, Roopinder K Sandhu, Lothar Roessig, Jasper Tromp, Cynthia M Westerhout, Adriaan A Voors, Paul W Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a high residual risk for heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. We aimed to use multimodality data to identify unique HFrEF subgroups with high residual risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this VICTORIA substudy (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, quantitative biomarker, and targeted proteomics data were collected. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using 105 variables to define HFrEF phenogroups. Cox regression estimated the relationship between the HFrEF phenogroups and the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. External validation of the phenogroups was performed in the BIOSTAT-CHF cohort (Biology Study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure). Multinomial logistic regression identified the most important variables in defining the HFrEF phenogroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 564 participants; after clustering, the optimal number of HFrEF phenogroups was 3. Phenogroup 1 was young, well-treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, and least likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Phenogroup 2 had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation and pathological Q-waves on electrocardiography. Phenogroup 3 was older, had more biventricular dysfunction, and had advanced renal disease. A stepwise increase in risk of the primary composite outcome was observed from HFrEF phenogroup 1 to 3 (hazard ratio, 7.0 [95% CI, 4.1-12.0]; <i>P</i>≤0.01). The phenogroups were externally validated in BIOSTAT-CHF, and phenogroup 3 had similar patient characteristics (eg, older with more significant renal dysfunction) and had the highest event rate at 1 year (41% [95% CI, 38-45]). After multinomial regression, GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15) was most important in discriminating the 3 HFrEF phenogroups in both VICTORIA and BIOSTAT-CHF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified and externally validated unique HFrEF subpopulations with shared biological characteristics that differentiated residual risk for cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. GDF-15 was the most important protein used to distinguish the 3 HFrEF phenogroups. These findings may inform study entry criteria for future HFrEF trials focused on the development of novel therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02861534.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e013166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013166\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者心力衰竭住院和心血管死亡的剩余风险很高。我们的目的是使用多模态数据来确定具有高残留风险的独特HFrEF亚组。方法:在VICTORIA亚研究(Vericiguat Global Study In Subjects With心力衰竭伴射血分数降低)中,收集临床、心电图、超声心动图、定量生物标志物和靶向蛋白质组学数据。使用105个变量进行聚集分层聚类来定义HFrEF表型群。Cox回归估计了HFrEF表型组与心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的主要复合结局之间的关系。表型组的外部验证在BIOSTAT-CHF队列(慢性心力衰竭量身定制治疗的生物学研究)中进行。多项逻辑回归确定了定义HFrEF表型组的最重要变量。结果:共564名受试者;聚类后,HFrEF表型组的最优数量为3个。表型组1是年轻的,接受了指导的药物治疗,最不可能有植入式心律转复除颤器。表型2组房颤和病理性心电图q波发生率最高。表型组3年龄较大,双心室功能障碍较多,有晚期肾病。从HFrEF表型组1到3,观察到主要复合结局的风险逐步增加(风险比为7.0 [95% CI, 4.1-12.0]; P≤0.01)。表型组在BIOSTAT-CHF中进行了外部验证,表型组3具有相似的患者特征(例如,年龄较大且肾功能更明显),并且在1年时的发生率最高(41% [95% CI, 38-45])。经多项回归分析,在VICTORIA和BIOSTAT-CHF中,GDF-15(生长分化因子15)对3种HFrEF表型组的区分最为重要。结论:我们确定并外部验证了独特的HFrEF亚群,这些亚群具有共同的生物学特征,可以区分心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的剩余风险。GDF-15是用于区分3种HFrEF表型组的最重要的蛋白。这些发现可能为未来以开发新疗法为重点的HFrEF试验的研究入组标准提供信息。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02861534。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenomapping in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction to Identify Subpopulations With High Residual Risk: A VICTORIA Substudy.

Background: Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a high residual risk for heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. We aimed to use multimodality data to identify unique HFrEF subgroups with high residual risk.

Methods: In this VICTORIA substudy (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, quantitative biomarker, and targeted proteomics data were collected. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using 105 variables to define HFrEF phenogroups. Cox regression estimated the relationship between the HFrEF phenogroups and the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. External validation of the phenogroups was performed in the BIOSTAT-CHF cohort (Biology Study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure). Multinomial logistic regression identified the most important variables in defining the HFrEF phenogroups.

Results: There were 564 participants; after clustering, the optimal number of HFrEF phenogroups was 3. Phenogroup 1 was young, well-treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, and least likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Phenogroup 2 had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation and pathological Q-waves on electrocardiography. Phenogroup 3 was older, had more biventricular dysfunction, and had advanced renal disease. A stepwise increase in risk of the primary composite outcome was observed from HFrEF phenogroup 1 to 3 (hazard ratio, 7.0 [95% CI, 4.1-12.0]; P≤0.01). The phenogroups were externally validated in BIOSTAT-CHF, and phenogroup 3 had similar patient characteristics (eg, older with more significant renal dysfunction) and had the highest event rate at 1 year (41% [95% CI, 38-45]). After multinomial regression, GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15) was most important in discriminating the 3 HFrEF phenogroups in both VICTORIA and BIOSTAT-CHF.

Conclusions: We identified and externally validated unique HFrEF subpopulations with shared biological characteristics that differentiated residual risk for cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. GDF-15 was the most important protein used to distinguish the 3 HFrEF phenogroups. These findings may inform study entry criteria for future HFrEF trials focused on the development of novel therapeutics.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02861534.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信