急性中度缺血性卒中的肾功能和远程缺血调节的疗效:RICAMIS试验的事后分析。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xiao-Yi He, Yu Cui, Jia-Qi Wang, Lu Wang, Hui-Sheng Chen
{"title":"急性中度缺血性卒中的肾功能和远程缺血调节的疗效:RICAMIS试验的事后分析。","authors":"Xiao-Yi He, Yu Cui, Jia-Qi Wang, Lu Wang, Hui-Sheng Chen","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence supports the therapeutic potential of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in acute stroke management. This post hoc analysis aims to elucidate the relationship between renal function and the efficacy of RIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis utilized the complete case dataset from the RICAMIS trial, enrolling acute ischemic stroke patients with documented renal function within 48 h of symptom onset. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission: normal (≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), mildly impaired (60-89 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>), and severely impaired renal function (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. We examined the association between RIC and functional outcomes within each renal function group, as well as the interaction between RIC efficacy and renal function, in comparison to patients receiving standard care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1652 patients evaluated, 941 had normal renal function, 605 had mildly impaired renal function, and 106 had moderate to severely impaired renal function. In comparison to the control group, RIC was associated with a higher probability of achieving the primary outcome in patients with normal renal function (69% vs. 64%) and those with mildly impaired renal function (66.7% vs. 59.7%). However, this association was not observed in patients with moderate to severely impaired renal function (64.1% vs. 66%, p = 0.428). There was no significant interaction between renal function and the efficacy of RIC (adjusted p value = 0.970).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with moderate to severely impaired renal function, RIC is associated with an increased likelihood of excellent functional outcome at 90 days in patients with normal and mildly impaired renal function.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740971.</p>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 10","pages":"e70831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal Function and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of RICAMIS Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Yi He, Yu Cui, Jia-Qi Wang, Lu Wang, Hui-Sheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence supports the therapeutic potential of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in acute stroke management. This post hoc analysis aims to elucidate the relationship between renal function and the efficacy of RIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis utilized the complete case dataset from the RICAMIS trial, enrolling acute ischemic stroke patients with documented renal function within 48 h of symptom onset. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission: normal (≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), mildly impaired (60-89 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>), and severely impaired renal function (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. We examined the association between RIC and functional outcomes within each renal function group, as well as the interaction between RIC efficacy and renal function, in comparison to patients receiving standard care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1652 patients evaluated, 941 had normal renal function, 605 had mildly impaired renal function, and 106 had moderate to severely impaired renal function. In comparison to the control group, RIC was associated with a higher probability of achieving the primary outcome in patients with normal renal function (69% vs. 64%) and those with mildly impaired renal function (66.7% vs. 59.7%). However, this association was not observed in patients with moderate to severely impaired renal function (64.1% vs. 66%, p = 0.428). There was no significant interaction between renal function and the efficacy of RIC (adjusted p value = 0.970).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with moderate to severely impaired renal function, RIC is associated with an increased likelihood of excellent functional outcome at 90 days in patients with normal and mildly impaired renal function.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740971.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e70831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504810/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70831\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新出现的证据支持远程缺血调节(RIC)在急性卒中管理中的治疗潜力。本事后分析旨在阐明肾功能与RIC疗效之间的关系。方法:这项事后分析利用了RICAMIS试验的完整病例数据集,纳入了症状出现48小时内肾功能有记录的急性缺血性卒中患者。参与者根据入院时估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)分为三组:正常(≥90 mL/min/1.73m2)、轻度肾功能受损(60-89 mL/min/1.73m2)和严重肾功能受损(< 60 mL/min/1.73m2)。主要结局是良好的功能结局,定义为90天的修正Rankin量表评分0-1。与接受标准治疗的患者相比,我们检查了每个肾功能组中RIC与功能结局之间的关系,以及RIC疗效与肾功能之间的相互作用。结果:1652例患者中,941例肾功能正常,605例肾功能轻度受损,106例肾功能中度至重度受损。与对照组相比,肾功能正常患者(69%对64%)和轻度肾功能受损患者(66.7%对59.7%)的RIC与达到主要结局的概率更高相关。然而,在中度至重度肾功能受损患者中没有观察到这种关联(64.1%对66%,p = 0.428)。肾功能与RIC疗效无显著相互作用(调整p值= 0.970)。结论:与中度至重度肾功能受损患者相比,RIC与正常和轻度肾功能受损患者90天良好功能结局的可能性增加相关。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03740971。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renal Function and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of RICAMIS Trial.

Background: Emerging evidence supports the therapeutic potential of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in acute stroke management. This post hoc analysis aims to elucidate the relationship between renal function and the efficacy of RIC.

Methods: This post hoc analysis utilized the complete case dataset from the RICAMIS trial, enrolling acute ischemic stroke patients with documented renal function within 48 h of symptom onset. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission: normal (≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), mildly impaired (60-89 mL/min/1.73m2), and severely impaired renal function (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. We examined the association between RIC and functional outcomes within each renal function group, as well as the interaction between RIC efficacy and renal function, in comparison to patients receiving standard care.

Results: Of the 1652 patients evaluated, 941 had normal renal function, 605 had mildly impaired renal function, and 106 had moderate to severely impaired renal function. In comparison to the control group, RIC was associated with a higher probability of achieving the primary outcome in patients with normal renal function (69% vs. 64%) and those with mildly impaired renal function (66.7% vs. 59.7%). However, this association was not observed in patients with moderate to severely impaired renal function (64.1% vs. 66%, p = 0.428). There was no significant interaction between renal function and the efficacy of RIC (adjusted p value = 0.970).

Conclusion: Compared with moderate to severely impaired renal function, RIC is associated with an increased likelihood of excellent functional outcome at 90 days in patients with normal and mildly impaired renal function.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740971.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信